I have yet to pass through the 1st chapter and yet, I think is one of the best books to construct history, that will later become inputs to discuss with broader knowledge of one of the most respected professors at Columbia University!
A self-replicating establishment built on “meritocratic” competition, the debt-driven collapse of 2008 - uncontrollable technological and social change that has produced a two-tier society.
PS. Conservative advocates of pure free markets. The author, Nobel laureate, argues, that free and competitive market is highly beneficial to society at large, but that it needs government regulation and oversight to remain functional.
disease health coach nurse and stand-up comedian with radio podcast for comedy and health care interviews
#1 econ explanatiom of reinvent america. triumph of the city and patchwork nation also useful
If you are politically on the far left, you may enjoy the propaganda.
I actually chose to listen to another book providing an apposing view. The problem with each of these books is that they both try to lay out an extreme case with questionable facts the authors have cherry picked.
There were a few interesting nuggets.
i expected a biased view, but I had hoped to get one that was better supported by facts. The author provides some thoughts on the price paid for inequality, but I got tied of wading through the repititous conspiracy theories to get there. I ctually gave up half way through
Well written, forcefully sets forth information that is easily understood about a vital topic that will affect us all in this century. In light of the results of the 2016 election it explains the anger of the American electorate, and the conflict that threatens to end the democratic experiment known as the United States of America.
The author provided evidence and personal and professional experience to make several cases dealing with the state of American society as it currently, or recently, stands.
I can think of little I gained from this listen. Most of us know why inequality is a problem. This author fails to project humility and that makes it hard to accept his ideas. I get the impression that if we gave this guy total control of our economy, he would be happy to take over. And then he would have a whole list of pedantic excuses for what went wrong when his policies failed. Like many elites, he seems prepared to do unjust things to achieve desired results--damn the repercussions. He thinks huge national debts are no problem. He may be the only economist who thinks that. He sees no reason to worry about runaway inflation. He thinks economic forces like that can always be brought under control and he sounds annoyed by people who think of economics in the traditional way. The reader is left feeling that economics is mysterious except to people like him.
The widening economic gap between the top 1% and the bottom 99% can be felt not just in America but also around the world.
Stiglitz' analysis of inequality that is made worse by rent-seeking, restricted social mobility and erroneous macroeconomic policies are enlightening.
I'm not an economics practitioner, but I greatly appreciate this Stiglitz' masterpiece.
The book makes a lot of good points, asks good questions and instead of just complaining offers solutions.
But it could have been shorter. Several times I'd stop to double check that I somehow didn't rewind the book because I'd heard that section before.