mother, wife, artist
This was a great novel, lots of twists and turns, who do you believe, the language was strong so be prepared for that, this book will make a great movie..but i am sure the book will be better..
I am a senior citizen who loves to listen to romance and mystery novels.
so slow moving and boring about the lives of "sick" people
Do not want to waste my time on "sick" people. This was not a true thriller just gave you an insight into "sick people. I have on my queue list Dark Places
but wonder whether I should waste my time.
None so far.
wasted a credit on this one
Yes, I thought the story line was intriguing, compelling and I would want to see if I could pick up on the clues even sooner.
I liked how it wasn't a laid out, get to the end mystery. There were twists that became more disfigured as the story played out.
The scene where Nick plays the performance of his life to get the "villain" to come back to his house and where she's shocked he pulled on over on her.
Hell Hath No Furry Like a Woman Scorned
This book has a lot of people divided by the last half of the storyline. I felt that going into it knowing some of the twisted part made me love it even more because it was like sitting in a movie, seeing someone is going to get their head chopped and you scream (futilely) "Turn around! Behind you!"
I think knowing who the bad guy was before it was revealed really made me want to figure out how it was discovered and how it ended. I think if you read this book going in blindly you would grow to hate it, because it messes with your head.
Heck, the ending alone messes with you - but it was so awesome!
Yes. Once I started I did want to finish it. It just became a little draggy at some parts.
I was a bit disappointed with the ending. It was clever, but anti-climatic compared to the section where the true nature of the characters are revealed. I expected and wanted something a bit more Earth-shattering, but I get what the author was doing. Basically, saying that it isn't over........EVER.
Still, I would have been much more satisfied if a little revenge was thrown in the face of the trouble-maker. It would have been a real "YES!!" moment.
They both presented the characters with gusto. Well done.
I haven't decided that yet. I wonder what the book would have been like had I read it myself. But, I was driving to FL and needed entertainment. I will say I was entertained.
It took a lot of thought to conjure up this story. Well detected and presented. In other words, I couldn't see a way out of the victim's hell, unless I was "Columbo". Not sure how the author thought it all through to tell you the truth. Very clever.
Also, any story that has a sociopath as a main character, is going to be very captivating. After all, nothing is more intriguing than getting inside the head a human being that has no conscious.
I very much liked the mystery aspect of the first half of the book that included the psycho woman making diary entries from the past while the "husband" character was making entries in more or less real time.
Write a more interesting ending.
Yes - these people were great. I enjoyed the delivery and the resonance of their voices.
Well, maybe but I would probably catch a nap at the end.
The impact of the alternating points of view and the development of many of the supporting characters carried this book farther than the actual story supported. The fundamental thesis seems either too clinical for me or just not credible. The resolution was not credible, based on the main characters. I don't want to provide a spoiler review, so I'll leave it there. Plot details were compelling and kept me listening around the clock. I loved the twin angle, the Amazing Amy impacts on the main characters, and the manipulation of the book's Nancy Grace character who brings the story to the national. stage. Its hard to praise all these factors while not accepting the greatness of the underlying themes of the book, but that's the way it came across -- the book was smaller than the some of its parts, i.e. development of minor characters such as Go, the powerful alternating points of view, the development of Bony, and the excellent presenters.
A Confederacy of Dunces, a book which I've read twice, but a preliminary listen makes me certain that the reader is terrific and will do justice to a true comedic masterpiece.
I read such great reviews of this book and even have an acquaintance who thinks it is the best book she's read in years so I couldn't wait to get started listening to it. I didn't like the first third of the download, but on the acquaintance's encouragement I listened to two thirds of the book before becoming so bored I couldn't continue. I don't care what happened in the end. It is a stupid book. It is written on an 8th grade level (maybe even 6th grade except for the sex). I will never have any respect for the NY Times book review or any other reviewer who gave this mess such a hot rating. I do not consider myself to be a critic and read just about all categories of books. Mysteries are among my favorites. This doesn't even deserve to be called a mystery, it is just a small, mean little book.
I found that I could not like any of the key characters in this book. They were both self centered egotist. You usually want someone to come out ahead when you read or listen to a book...needless to say I found the ending somewhat of a downer.
It's impossible to review this book in any depth without spoiling one of the numerous plot twists. It's a thriller, it's riveting, it's readable and totally engaging.
As a water-cooler or book club discussion focus, this book is a gold mine. Insights into marriage? Check. Point of view switching? Check. Unreliable narrator(s)? Check. Also do-I-like-them-or-not characters, will s/he won't s/he, oh-no-you-DIDN'T, and much more, handled with adroit skill by former Entertainment Weekly reviewer Gillian Flynn.
The woman is a helluva novelist.
It was on the best seller list and everyone seemed to like it so I selected this book. Only one other time in my 12 years of Audible have I gotten a book I just could not stand to finish. I stuck it out for three hours, but finally had to give up, though I would like to know what happened to her.
At first I thought it was Heybourne's reading that made it bad. He's so slow and drags out words like wwwaaaaaaaaaaaarrrrmmmmmmmmmmmmmm thinking it will convey warmth. Well, it doesn't; it's just a drag. Whelan's not much better; I could imagine her popping gum though it wasn't in the book. But then, maybe that was a lot of it...the book itself was so, so, cutesy every time it referred to something "shitty". And naming his sister , "Go"; give me a break. It went of on so many tangents at the least little drop of a noun, a verb, anything - it didn't take much. The story could probably have been told in 6 hrs if Flynn had stayed on point and Heybourne could have picked up the pace.
Eventually I threw in the towel. Glad everyone else liked it so much; it's just not for me.