Free Love enthusiastics and people that prefer to 'get off' on things implied more then the graghic detail.
The soap boxed free love scenes.
Basically you have an adult wizard of oz type book on the surface. Wierd natural laws allowing for wierd solutions to wierd problems. And lots and lots of unerotic sex. Free love is ultimately the real moral of the book. And that anything that inhibits the desire for free love is wrong. This is not to say this is an erotic book, no, nor is this just the autrhor squeezing in his own beliefs or fantasies. I mean I had to stop around chapters 9 or 10 because the characters were literally monologung about the virtues of free love and how strange and immoral prudism is. And it was boring. And even before this so much time was spent describing the women, and the main character's struggle to not indulge that that I was getting exasperated with the boredom. There were some witty remarks to keep it entertaining, some worthwhile comic relief and even a few though not long or common, but a few entertaining action scenes. But ultimately the repeated pounding of the message of 'IF TWO OR THREE PEOPLE ARE ATTRACTED TO EACH OTHER THEY SHOULD HAVE SEX! ITS STUPID AND WRONG FOR ANY CUSTOM THAT PREVENTS THIS! AND EVERYONE IS HAPPIER WHEN YOU ALLOW IT!' That it just became so boring I could no longer listen to it.
Anger that I wasted my credit
It says it was released in 2012, but the prose and rambling narrative seems like the work from an earlier era. The unsophisticated dialogue plot line and character development is even more sickening than the antiquated gender roles and biases. Just save you dime, this rag is for the birds *in my best old timey voice*
loved the book. the audio narration is better than what was in my head. the book was brought to life very well I think Bronson P. "gets" Heinlein and his sense of humor and seriousness in perfect balance.
Big heinlein fan here.
Glory Road is just bad.
How to sum it up... When Heinlein wrote this, fantasy was still a fairly new field. Its obvious that Heinlein had not read very much of it. I would guess that he had not read Tolkein or other writers that might have expanded how he thought about this genre. This book is linear. it feels like other fantasy books I have read during this period. Its not very creative. I enjoyed how it started, but once the main character hits 'fantasy', it becomes goofy and dumb.
I have read almost everything Heinlein wrote. This is one of the few books of his that I would rate poorly.
Darn fine adventure!
The Wedding of Star to Ah-Scar!
I laughed... a LOT!
I was a bit leery about this audio book because I had been disappointed upon reading the hard-cover edition; it left me flat. I think It just goes to show that something is GAINED in narration!
My all time Second favorite Heinlein tale. And Mr. Pinchot's reading was, for me, spot on. Was initially annoyed at Rufo's French accent, but by less than midway, I found it indispensable. A hearty well done to all involved.
I love Heinlein's works - starship troopers, stranger in a strange land, etc. This was a fun book, but not one of his finest. it might have deserved 4 starts except for my dissapointment
having recently reread all of the old heinlein material, i realized i'd never read this one. now i know why. i found his treatment of women embarrassing.
more fantasy than sci fi
There are a few Heinlein books that aren't to my taste, but this is the only one I truly dislike. There is no way for me to describe why Glory Road is so bad without a lot of spoilers.
Bronson Pinchot turns in a great performance, but he wasn't given a lot to work with.