To start with I've enjoyed everything from this author so far. I did not know that this book was part of a series. Saying that, the book is wonderful until the main characters meet the characters from the series other books. The book just looses focus, and goes off in unentertaining ways. The book never recovers.
Elderly Republican men and time-traveling bit players from 1950's romantic comedies, or perhaps teen-age boys whose parents are too strict to let them read anything written after 1970.
As I don't know which was which, I probably won't risk it. Most of them were fine, just two were grating -- and one might have been overacting a part even *she* was too irritated by to read straight.
I loved Heinlein when I was a teenager, 40 years ago. I dismissed the feminist critics who claimed his women characters were products of misogyny -- as I still do. Nonetheless, pneumatic multilingual sex kittens with PhD's in Math get wearisome. I made the mistake of trying to read both this (The Number of the Beast) and Time Enough for Love at the same time, and overdosed. Between RAH's unfathomable pregnancy fetish and the endless bickering of the married characters, the pouting coyness (or coy poutiness?) of one of the female readers and the wheezing of one of the men, I couldn't finish it. I hate returning books -- I always think, "well, I'll give it another try," but not this one. I can re-read Starship Troopers one more time and remember why I loved this writer. Now I realize what made it so great -- no women at all for Heinlein to portray in his singularly bizarre way.
Heinlein 's women where always written light in the personality heavy in the loins. When narrators voice there woman to sound like a fawning dits, those characters collapse completely.
The story started off interesting, and the idea of multiple universes in this context was unique. That aspect of the story was very enjoyable, however, the end of part three and all of part four have no drama. The story devolves into a polygamous sex orgy that I did not find either enjoyable or purposeful. It is nice that the multiple different stories of Heinlein are merged in this story, but nothing meaningful or resolute comes from it, other than that they are all now husbands and wives in the Long family and have lots of sex with each other.
The several different narrators gives the audio performance a nice touch, and it keeps things interesting until the latter part of part three and into part four. At that point, only a change in the story could save things. The Cat That Walks Through Walls makes more sense now though, which is nice. I'm a fan of Heinlein, but this book just didn't do much for me.
First the book: This is a great addition to the set of Heinlein's works for those who loved Lazarus Long and wanted more in that vein. The book is largely character driven, plot is uncomplicated, but enjoyable if you can come to enjoy the people in it.
Next the reading: This could have been stunning. An ensemble cast reading of this book... the idea took my breath away. That is not, precisely, what this is. The book is, with an exception or two, written from the perspective of the four major characters, each one voicing a chapter at a time. One reader takes each chapter, so you have Hilda's voice... and Hilda's reader doing Zeb's voice... anyone familiar with audiobooks is accustomed to that, but it was a strange choice. One voice is a bit grating as other reviewers have indicated. The two main male voices are pleasing, but were mis-cast, they should have been reversed.
I am a great lover of this book, so I still enjoyed this reading, but I couldn't help but reflect regularly as it went on that it could have been so much better than it is. If a flawed choice in reader or readers ruins an audiobook for you, I do not recommend this recording.
I've read the book, long ago, so I know it is good. Listening too this version was painful. I had to stop after a few hours. Just couldn't take it any longer. The narration was not working well at all. Timing and emphasis seemed all way off. Made it difficult to follow and impossible to enjoy. Wish it were otherwise.
Nothing: the story is drenched in sex and coarse humor. Very disappointing
Strong sexual content and coarse humor
nerd, biker, finnish, middle-aged and cool
Something from Neal Stephenson.
I actually did not dislike the narrator's performance all that much.Even though I did not understand why so many narrators were used in the first place, the narrators were doing a decent job. But why so many?
Throughout the story I had a feeling that the book was an insider joke. Sure, I did recognize many of the references to other fiction, and I even greeted "something from the stranger in the strange land" with a small smile.
I could not understand the reason why the book was written. Heinlein has done a great work in speculating with sociology and technology of the future, but here, the experiments with nudity taboo and economy did not save the day.
I gave up listening a couple of times, but there were occasions I had no other book to listen, so I carried painfully on.
I was happy to get to the end, and even that was an anticlimax.
As long as you DO NOT LISTEN to the last chapter, you'll be very happy.
Hilda--a true force of nature, funny, sexy, smart, and fierce.
For the four main characters, yes. For the creature that voiced Jubal Harshaw, not in a million years. It will takes years of therapy to undo the damage that man did to my brain. He made Jubal Harshaw sound like Frank Zappa's Thing-Fish.
Print: The final chapter is the only sore spot for me. The book is quite wonderful, and the World as Myth concept is highly engaging.
Audio: Loved the 4 main characters. The second I heard the voice for Jubal, I wanted to hit my iPhone with a brick until it stopped making that horrible noise. I cannot describe how utterly AWFUL and ridiculous he sounded.
The voice actor for Jubal--Tom Weiner?--should be forever banned for this performance.
Yes. Interesting Idea of the universe are put forward. But let down by it's presentation
The idea of "free" time space travel, and what could be out there.
Which narrator! This is my big problem with this book there are many narrators and they change each chapter. This makes it very hard to follow who is who, as the whole reading style changes. The narrators ranged from very good to comical. Over all the male narrators did a better job than the female ones, as the women speaking as males were not as believable.BTW is this question even grammatically correct? "narrators' performances". Sorry just a question, I've always had problems with genitive in english
For this recording, Listening time NO.But I would attempt it again with a single male narrator. Or just pick up the book and read it myself.
And I know now to stick to early Heinlein work.
The story read as if it was out of the 50s or 60s. it's really hard to believe it was written and published around 1980. There is a lot of "our dear husbands", and "now were married". Then later in the book the story drops into FKK, wife swapping and finally into incest. I personally think this is not Heinlein at his best (or anywhere close to it). However I really like the basic premise of mathematics bridging worlds and times and imagination.