I thought, since one main character was supposed to be a detective, that there should be a mystery in it. It turned out to be just a fantasy, much sounding like it was written for children but having way too much violence, sex, and profanity for any child I'd want to know. That said, I was slow to realize that most of the characters were not real people at all. I thought they just needed medication. They didn't get it, and by the end had all gone off the deep end in the most teenage zombie b-movie way imaginable. Now I have to go kick myself around the block a couple of times for once again, incredibly, being taken in by publisher and apparently friends of the author reviews. That said, there were some points having nothing to do with the story or the performance where I though it could have morphed into a good book, but guess I'll have to use my own imagination for that.
it took a long while for the plot to develop. The story line, characters, and setting came together well. Then about 3/4 through, the author does some gymnastic plot flip that becomes incomprehensible. I guess if you like angels archangels and demons inhabiting people without them knowing it, fighting some obscure religious battle, then this book might be for you. I didn't finish it.
The performance was outstanding and I will look for more of his work.
I have taught my two boys at home for the last 8 years. A love of literature of all kinds led me to Audible.
I'm not a reader who needs instant gratification. I love a good telling that slowly unfolds with patience and character development. I adore novels that immerse me in the settings so I feel as if I was part of the tale. This novel was none of these things. I understood the format the author used. I could guess the plot was headed somewhere but I cared so little for the people in the story that I was thoroughly frustrated as the novel went on. The story seemed more focused on attempts at being cryptic that it's delivery is cold and hard. When I read, o don't expect to HAVE to make myself sit down and endure. This one was not for me.
Say something about yourself!
I really wanted to love this book. I have a weird fascination with angels, and I love to see them in stories that aren't cookie cutter romances. Building a story off the Book of Enoch? You have my attention, but I'm looking to see if you can bring anything new to the table. This one didn't.
I also don't mind a slow burn with character development when it's done well and pacing is considered. Give me a reason to want to continue. The audiobook for this is nearly 22 hours long, and quite literally nothing happens for two thirds of it. I can't blame the narrator. Jonathan Davis is a narrator I'm quite familiar with, having had him along for the majority of the Star Wars audiobooks over the years. He's fantastic. After that long of a setup, there needs to be more than just atmosphere and setting. As realistic as it feels (which is a selling point), the accompanying choppy writing style should serve to move things along and convey a sense of urgency and storytelling. In this case it was like being stuck in traffic: hit the gas, hit the brake after 20 feet. I experience that twice a day as it is and listen to audiobooks to escape that sensation.
The other part of the problem is character. Using archetypes is a great idea for storytelling, but when you develop them, that development should actually go somewhere. I got to know these characters. They live and breathe like my next door neighbors. And like my next door neighbors, I didn't really care about any of them because nothing interesting happens for the bulk of the story. By the time the starting gun fires, the audience is too asleep to hear it. To make things worse, I've seen these characters before, all of them written better, by Victor Hugo. It's The Hunchback of Notre Dame, with angels. Why didn't it work? Because Victor Hugo is an acknowledged master, and everyone knows the story even if they haven't read it. That I have read it just really makes me want to go back and read it again because (just like with movies) I find most remakes to be lazy and largely intolerable. Don't tell someone else's story. The good ones are there to revisit in all their glory, and the bad ones don't deserve a second chance. Tell your own story.
Because I do see potential here now that the setup is out of the way, I will likely return for book 2 of this trilogy, someday. I feel like now that the Hunchback section of this story is told poorly, perhaps we can move on to something more worthy. If it proves to be more of the same, I'll just drop it in favor of the next title.
If you have 21+hours to invest in a so-so story, then yes.
I was glad that the story eventually progressed and reached an ending. I had my doubts, but was somewhat surprised by the ending.
Shorten the book by at least 7 hours
No, unless it is cut down to a manageable size story.
Good idea and good story, just too much background and too much detail on side stories.
Married mother of three teenagers, back to work after 15 years at home - when I read a lot. Now I am the assistant to the Mayor of Omaha and work at least 60 hours a week, and on top of what I have to do at home - no more books. This lets me listen to the classics, the latest, whatever I want. I can learn or escape. I have always love audio books, but now I NEED them.
I was uncertain how to categorize this book, and now that I am done, I am even more uncertain. It is not classic lit like Hunchback, and it is not religious, in spite of the references to a forgotten book of the Bible and angels. It is a mystery wrapped in a supernatural snuff film. Weird enough? Wait. High priced/smart alec call girl I really liked, the slow but SOOOOO sweet bell ringer at the church I want to bake cookies for, and an "investigator" who may be a complete hot mess, all chasing angels and dead people killed in truly creative and terrifying ways, and I love them all. Their set-ups are very cliche, but very quickly after meeting them, I didn't care. Maybe I shouldn't love this, maybe this book follows no acceptable method of writing I learned in English class, but I loved it, I still think about the story and the characters, and I have no higher praise for any book.
Im some guy in Oshkosh, WI that walks to work and has found the joy of listening to good books and values good narrators :).
This is long book. Its starts off pretty slow and you get to learn a lot of details about the characters lives long before any action begins. He does a great job of slowly interweaving their lives that you almost wonder if their ever going to meet. He keeps the story line a mystery till about the end. Once you get whats going on your left wanting to know more about the back story the "before times" times. The book is a bit moody and somewhat sad. If your looking for a book that lighthearted and fun (my typical types of books) this wont be that type of read.
No. It was a very long book. Story was engrossing at times but not enough to re-read.
Yes, U would try another. This is his first book, it will be interesting to see how his writing matures.
He did a great performance as a cat. I also enjoyed his performan of the lead 3 characters, Marc, Harper, and Catherine.
No. Much to long to read in one sitting. It took me three days to complete the book.
This book was a very mixed experience. The characters were well-written and unforgettable; very endearing. The mystery story is intriguing. It was the fantasy part of the story that seemed to be a mishmash of fantasy and multiple religions lumped together. The story probably could have been better without the fantasy element. I also was not fond of the ending; it was not satisfying to me at all.
So boring. Nothing else to say. I can't remember anything about it. I became catatonic. I could not get pass second chapter.
Don't waste your credits.