Maggie Hope is a new character in the many mysteries about women in war times. She was British born, but was raised by her aunt in America after her mother was killed in a car crash and her Dad 'lost it' mentally. After graduating top in her class with top skills in math and languages, she's planning to get a graduate degree at MIT, but her plans change when she returns to England to sell the old family home. Getting a job in England is hindered by the prevailing attitude that 'women belong in the home, or in support jobs'. She has mixed feeling about her secretarial job at #10 Downing Street but is prepared to do ALL for home and country.
Frustrated by her seeming menial secretarial job, her position changes when she decodes a covert message she finds in the newspaper. This comes along with her replacing PM Churchill's sick secretary. Everything's comes fast and furious after that. Murders, spies, bombs, and differing views about Hitler mixed with Irish IRA resistance actions, keeps everyone anxious and working to keep England in the winning mix of war.
What adds extra interest to this book is the well researched addition of views on women, spies, Churchill, and decoding enemy messages. The factual research for this fictional book is spectacular! There are also relationships between diverse friends and family secrets that made this book a cut above the present popular WW2 women mysteries like the Jacqueline Winspear series. If you enjoy this genre, you need to add this Maggie Hope series to your reading list!!
I love to read books set in interesting places or historical settings. I especially love mysteries and thrillers.
The title was what got me to choose this audio book. This time period and setting is one of my favorite reading subjects. I found the day to day description of living in the 1930-40s in England,and working for Mr.Churchill, to be the most interesting part of the story. It has been about a month since I finished the audio book and while I can remember the hardships and fear of the English people, I can hardly recall the mystery at all.
There is a good back-story that includes the Irish conflict during this time period. The main character was bland to me, but likable.
Would I read another book by this author? Maybe.
I absolutely loved this novel. The main character, Maggie Hope, is obviously incredibly intelligent, but also ambitious and quirky. What I really enjoyed about the novel is that all of the characters are multidimensional. MacNeal has made sure to make her characters both entertaining and believable. Most importantly Mr. Churchill's Secretary does best what historical fiction is supposed to do--it brings you fully into a different time and place. MacNeal does this effortlessly in that she has obviously done her homework, but she doesn't shove it down your throat. In essence, she's done her research so well that you don't notice it. Instead, you get lost in an excellent storyline with fascinating characters.
Aslo, McCaddon does a great job as narrator. Her imitation of Churchill is PERFECT. She makes clear differences between her voice as narrator, and the different voices of the characters.
I thought this book would be about cryptography and codebreaking in World War II. I expected Bletchley Park and Alan Turing and Nazi double-agents, with a female mathematician as the protagonist, which sounded cool... maybe something like a light cozy version of Neal Stephenson's Cryptonomicon.
Alas, no. This was a "cozy" of the most offensively stupid and badly-written kind. Characters who are just quirky/"charming" composites of personality traits (expect many, many recyclings of British/American stereotypes vis-a-vis tea and coffee) and nicknames, arbitrary name-dropping of historical figures and events, usually accompanied by long infodumps to remind us that this is taking place in England during World War II ('cause the title wasn't a big enough clue), and cardboard villains (Nazis and IRA terrorists who practically twirl their mustaches while cackling over England's demise). A male character is introduced as "enigmatic" and "frustrating" (and yes, we're just told he's enigmatic and frustrating, he never actually does anything enigmatic or frustrating) - i.e., DESIGNATED LOVE INTEREST in great big flashing letters, but not content to leave any cliche unplumbed to its depths, sure enough, he and the main character spend most of the book snapping at each other and declaring one another to be insufferable and impossible and annoying while giving each other looks accompanied by "unexpected" hot flushes at Significant Times.
Maggie Hope ("Magster" to her friends - seriously, was that even done in the 40s?) is British by birth, born in London to British parents, but raised in America by a college professor aunt after her parents died in a car crash. With a PhD in mathematics, Maggie returns to London to sell her grandmother's house, just as World War II begins. By various contrived circumstances, Maggie winds up as a typist/secretary to Winston Churchill himself, by which device the author recites verbatim many of Churchill's speeches, inserting some adoring commentary from Maggie. We also get an extraordinarily cutesy take on Churchill as a fictional non-fictional character, which the publishers have the nerve to call "psychological insight into Winston Churchill," just like they call this book "meticulously researched" because MacNeal mentions Alan Turing (in a single sentence) and makes an allusion to Rebecca by Daphne du Maurier. (I guess MacNeal thought she was being clever by showing she can read Wikipedia.)
Oddly enough, though Maggie's aunt is a lesbian and one of her British friends (who works with her at Downing St.) is gay, this is something that is just accepted with open-minded tolerance by Maggie and her friends, along with cheery hopes that someday he won't have to keep it a secret. That's about as far as the book goes in addressing the very real persecution of homosexuality that existed at that time — you'd think if the author is going to name-drop Alan Turing, who was later forced to undergo chemical castration because of his homosexuality and ended up committing suicide (hey, Susan MacNeal, that's on Wikipedia too!), she might have had the characters acknowledge that homosexuality was actually a rather serious secret to be harboring. But no, the gay characters apparently exist only to show us how open-minded Maggie is and to score the author some gay-inclusion points.
Maggie is a mathematician and we are frequently told how brilliant she is, which is mostly an excuse for her to go on periodic rants about how unfair it is that she's not allowed to be a codebreaker and is relegated to being a typist and how sexist society is and how sexist her coworkers are blah blah blah. Okay, fair enough, it was a very sexist time period and no doubt a smart university-educated woman like Maggie would have been very aware of and irritated by this, but her repeatedly getting up on a soapbox to tell us that England in the 1940s was sexist and the sky is blue do not feel historical or even appropriate for her circumstances, just an excuse for the author to show us how very feisty and feminist her character is. Her friends mostly just kind of nod and say "Gosh, you're right Maggie, oh, hey, what is Winston Churchill really like?"
Maggie also decides she's either American or British whenever it suits her. When her friends or coworkers question her dedication or trustworthiness because of her American upbringing, she loudly tells them she's British by birth and a British taxpayer and a British homeowner and British, dammit! But when they start criticizing America, she defends the US and complains about the UK and doesn't correct them when they refer to Roosevelt as "your President."
Does Maggie ever use her codebreaking skills? Yeah, kind of, at the level of a 12-year-old cracking his first alphanumeric-substitution cipher.
The plot involved a really stupid Nazi/IRA plan to assassinate Churchill and some "surprise twists" that are pretty lame (and also spelled out for us beforehand by the author's constant "telling"), but it still could have been moderately entertaining anachronistic brain candy if the writing hadn't been so terrible.
Ever heard the writing advice "show don't tell"? You have if you've ever flirted with writing even a little. Mr. Churchill's Secretary could be a case study in how to tell without showing. We are told that everyone is very inspired by Churchill's speeches. We are told that the British bravely face the Blitz. We are told that this or that major event happened. We are constantly told what characters are thinking and feeling, in lieu of having them actually say it or act like it. When a character dies, we are told they died. The book is also full of head-hopping by a third-person narrator who can't decide whether she wants to be close-third or omniscient. Really, I could not believe this book got published, the writing was so bad.
It doesn't help that all the women are constantly "shrill," "hysterical," "trilling," and their eyes are constantly filling with hot tears on every other page. There's your "feminism" for you. The female characters are also the ones who break down, the female villains are the ones who are easily overpowered - I mean, at one point someone walks into a room and just walks over and takes a gun from a woman holding it pointed at someone else because... she's a woman and couldn't actually be a threat, with a gun? And of course they are also the ones who have second thoughts and end up abandoning their cause when they find out that gosh, Nazis and IRA terrorists are actually bad people who do bad things - why they never imagined that things might get ugly!
Just bleah, bleah, bleah. A dumb story without a spark of originality or nuance, and offensively bad writing. And this is the first in a series. No, I will not be reading the sequels. If you're looking for an exciting tale of a codebreaking female special agent in World War II, don't get suckered like I was, because this book is mindless and poorly crafted. 1.5 stars, the half star because the story is kind of okay for what it is, but I am rounding down instead of up like I usually do because I have read fan fiction and rough drafts written better than this and I am depressed that this book got published.
Follow me on Goodreads too!
This series has been popping up in my recommendations so regularly that I began to feel hit over the head with it!
I am glad I finally decided to take the plunge and read it - I was looking for something to fill the Maisie Dobbs void since I dropped that series after book 3 and I think Maggie Hope is just the ticket.
Book one was like an audition for the series and I am glad to say that overall I liked it – even though my reoccurring problem of being bad at remembering names made the story a little confusing at times! The main character is interesting, I like her and want to know more about her, and I especially like the setting of London in the 1940s.
Book 2 appeals to me very much as it includes the Royal Family! I’m looking forward to diving in.
Regarding the narrator, I am confused. This says it was narrated by Wanda McCaddon, but it was actually Donada Peters. I wonder why the difference?
I like the audiobook but not sure I would listen to it again. There isn't enough meat to it to require me reading it again.
If Wanda McCaddon is the main narrator then I do like her voice and she is definitely skilled. Having said that, I got distracted by her American accent at times. It distracted me from the story and I hyperfocused on her pronunciations. Mostly it's noticable when she is going between the british and american accents. Since the main character grew up in America, it would be better to have it narrated by someone with a stronger, more fluid american accent. Overall, I thought it was great!
Yes, but I can only listen during my commute unfortunately.
I like the historical background stories. It really adds to the overall book and since it combines my two favorites, history and mystery, I plan to read the next in the series.
It would rank near the top. Great plot that moves along and not side tracked my meaningless dialog.
The History and life in wartime London. The personality of Maggie Hope. Not over played just great reading.
Great. Voices were hard to adjust but did so quickly. Great job.
It was a fun book. Easy listening and great plot. I would highly recommend this book as a must read. Blend of history and plot. Great characters.
Must read book and series.
This is my second listen to this story. Enjoyed it the second time even more.
A conversation between Maggy and Claire/Page when they are tied up together.
Maggy, of course. However, I really liked David too.
No extreme reaction to the overall book, but an emotional understanding of the bombing of London.
This is a good story about the trials of WWII and Londoners lives durning these years.
I also learned more about the IRA issues.
Artist & Journeyman Composter
Unlike another reviewer who said she was too old to be sympathetic to the heroine's adventures and romantic development, I, though a middler, have family issues that made this story human, evocative, real, and opened up a part of global history previously closed. Hitler probably expected his Blitzkrieg to flatten every country in its path, but Britain was different, by circumstance, pluck, fellow feeling, and determined persistence despite horrors.
Maggie Hope, the protagonist, was born a British citizen, but was raised in the USA by a maiden lesbian aunt upon the putative death of her parents. A grandmother dies, leaving her a beautiful but aging Victorian in Britain, forcing Maggie's return. She comes from a brilliant family; her forte, and charmed love which keeps her emotionally balanced is mathematics and puzzle solving and she is in the middle of advanced studies which she is loathe to leave.
When the house doesn't sell due to the onslaught of the war, she decides to stay, and upon invitation, applies for a position as Churchill's typist. The real secretarial jobs were entitled "Personal Secretary" and were reserved for elite young British men who did research rather than take dictation. I loved how she met and made friends with others her age, all unique characters, which formed a supportive and diverse bond.
Using this opportunity to find out more about her parents, she looks for clues as to her father's past, as he worked as a mathematician at one of the colleges. Her curiosity must be satisfied, despite the attempts by her auntie to dissuade her from this search. Maggie is not only very bright, but quite determined.
Thus ensues her adventures pursuing her double purpose: to find out more about her family, and to fulfill herself as a potentially valuable code breaker.
The insights into Churchill's character, the delightful slow development of her love life,
the real historical events interwoven just as we would have experienced them had we
been there, the closeness and support of her friends, the feminist issues of male preference and denigration of women's abilities, the inclusion of gay and lesbian characters and how they coped in a still prejudiced society, her physical courage and willingness to
take risks were all pleasing to me and made a good story.
The narrator did well with all the British voices, but was inconsistent with Maggie's American accent, sometimes sounding a bit Irish, or using incorrect vowels, but was overall quite acceptable. The only other criticism, which may or may not be helpful, was
the amount of physical terrors and events in the second half. I kept expecting THIS climax to be the final one, but there were many, and I was probably staying up too late and getting tired.
Nevertheless, the author tied up everything nicely, and did create sufficient interest to continue. I love learning about history through the feelings and experiences of people who were there. (However, the narrator changed, and has a more meanly violent voice for the tough guys, and has a singsong delivery otherwise, often ending on an up sound for the end of a sentence rather than a down note. I found it rather like being on a roller coaster,which was too distracting, and ruined the harmony of delivery. Perhaps I shall get the books.)
After reading the reviews, I am almost afraid to say that I liked this book.
Why would I enjoy this fictionalized version of Churchill and his world? Call me a sucker for a British spy story that is easy to listen to without the need to take notes to keep up with the characters and sub-plots. The narrator, Ms. McCaddon, handles the tone of the characters well, drifts from dialect to dialect without pause, male - female, no problem. In short, she is easy and entertaining to listen to as she brings a story to life - and I enjoyed my time with her.
MacNeal tees up the next installment, which is already in my library.
Look, this is fiction. It is supposed to take you into a piece of time and place that, for a short while, wraps you in a story effectively enough to make you feel the emotion of the characters, visualize the scenes described, smell the foods, tea and smoke from bombing and cigars and leave you entertained. She accomplished that for me.
Certainly, it is not historically accurate - it's fiction! It's entertainment and I enjoyed it.