Great book, just like his tv show. He is fair and uses real facts to make his arguments.
Government Hinders Enterprise
Proof and examples of an overreaching system
He continues to report and summarize in his own style without vindictive platitudes.
We are bankrupting this country
Keep them scared John!!
This is so right on...every voter should read this prior to his or her vote. I do fear Stossel is spitting into the wind, however, for the government will never relenquish their power or leave us alone.
Normally I think books are better when read and not listened to, and I only use audiobooks because it's something to do while driving the car. But in this case yes, I completely reccomend listening to it because John Stossel narrates it himself, and he has a great style of speaking and emphasis that I think is unmatched in anywhere in network television today.
The part where he brought up the interesting statistic where 95% of workers in America today are paid above the minimum wage, emphasizing the uselessness of such job killing regulations.
Actually no. Even though I should be furious in rage at what the federal government is doing to this country, John has a peaceful and open minded approach to all of the issues he brings up, and it has a way of comforting you to know that the truth will win in the end.
I can't reccomend this enough. Five stars, if you're reading this review then buy this one now.
Had seen John on TV for years and enjoyed his work , but the book really brought the concept of his views home for me. Not sure that he completely turned me to the libertarian point of view but he did made me think.
Stossel, gets a bit whiney at times, and beats up on his former employers a bit monotonously. However that is the worst thing I can say about this book. Stossel takes shots at the false left right dichotomy of the USA while making a great proletarian case for liberty and libertarianism. He does so by contrasting intuition with real-world results. If you read Libertarianism a Primer, by David Boaz you will not gain much new insight here, though your filed of view will expand as you will gain more examples. If you found teh above book too far embedded in philosophy and political science to be an easy read or listen, you will find Stossel covers the same basic ground in a more man-on-the-street format.Over all I rate this very well. Stossel makes a compelling case, and has good delivery overall.
Made me want to learn about Libertarianism.
My next book was "Liberty Defined" by Ron Paul, then "Free to Choose," by Milton & Rose Friedman.
Very easy listen, very entertaining.
I loved this audiobook and highly recommend it.
Our government tries. Our leaders intentions are good. But they (our government) have built a system so caught up in favoring one over the other while call it fairness, or safety, or whatever other term is in vogue that rights now belong to corporations not individuals. Help is not assistance it is a prop.
YOU can overcome the obstacles. YOU can do what the government can't. John's stories and ideas actually gave me more hope, a fresher perspective, and made me wonder..."Am I a Libertarian"?
Like any book read by the author the pace and timing are flawless. Inflection and emphasis I can only assume is placed exactly where John wanted it.
I found this an interesting read that made me think and gave me conversational fodder for my Red and Blue friends alike.
Husband, Father, attorney, veteran, libertarian.
Top third. Nothing really earth-shatteringly new in the book but he delivers the material in a nice package to see the contrast between top-down planners and the bottom-up liberty perspective.
He sticks with a theme of intuition tells us 'X' but reality tells me 'Y' that he uses to debunk the planners/statists/socialists theories.
Nice even delivery with enough emphasis or emotion to show he is into the subject but not distracting.
I actually enjoyed this book, since I am very much in agreement with Mr. Stossel on most things. I recommend it for those with a small-government mentality if they want to listen to something they already agree with, but I don't have any illusions that it will be particularly persuasive to anyone else.