yes. Good narrator, will make them think and question their beliefs about death
Heaven is For Real is one book which I might compare this audiobook to. Both books explore what happens when a person dies, and each book takes a unique perspective. Some people, like myself, believe that when we die, we will go to Heaven and be with our religious Savior, such as Christ. Others have a more secular view, that life simply stops at death. After listening to both books, people on both sides will be able to debate the issue, inteligently.
No, but, like J. Charles, I found her to be a captivating narrator. I would listen to her audiobooks, again.
It would be Joanna, definitely! I could not stand Mr. Mandrake, and I think Richard would be engrossed in his experiments with diazamine, (I can't remember the drug that was used to put the subjects into near-death experiences), but I think that Richard would be too wrapped up in his work to be interesting. Kit is trying to take care of her uncle who has Alzheimer's, and I want her to spend as much time with him as she can. Joanna would probably be an interesting person to talk to, and I think I could learn a lot about the near-death research that she has been working on. That type of thing, (neurological research), really interests me.
You will not be prepared for the surprising ending, or for what happens to Joanna just as she makes the important breakthrough about the neurological role in the near-death experience! If you are interested, get Passage by Connie Willis!
Oof. Good story, good writing, but wayyyyyy tooooooo drawn out. It reads as though the author thinks that 45 things need to get in the way of every plot event, when sometimes a simpler path would have been better. I'm surprised I finished it.
The narration was great, each character coming to life! And the story, with its twists and unexpected turns was captivating.
I have read the Oxford time travel books by Connie Willis , of which I enjoyed. I had higher expectations for this book. A lot of rambling , & the story line just didn't click for me.
Connie Willis owes me a credit. I listened to the ENTIRE 29 hours 44 minutes and this book and it never got past its first act (to borrow a stage term). After the first 4 hours, I mostly had it play for the soothing sound of Dina Pearlman's voice. When my mind wandered, as it often does while listening and doing something else, I never had to back up to listen again to what I had missed because NOTHING HAPPENED. It is almost 30 hours of speculation about what happens when you die. Great for helping you fall asleep. Do not expect a story.
We are a couple who love books and occasionally write reviews. We rarely read the same book so our reviews express our individual opinions.
Not really. There were some interesting sections and some of the characters were likeable, but 30 hours was too long for a story that did not have much of a plot. I have an interest in NDEs but this book dealt with the topic in a very creative but somewhat bizarre manner.
I enjoyed the narration and thought she handled the different voices quite well and made the story more interesting. I don't think I would have kept going with the story if I had been reading a printed book.
Please no. As the whole book seemed to be trying to prove that NDEs were some sort of brain reaction while at the same time also describing the perspective of people who had "passed over" but were still somehow conscious and aware, I can't imagine what sort of crazy follow up plot would allow both these contradictory scenarios to coexist.
Would be willing to try another of Connie Willis's books as lots of reviews suggest her other books are better than this one.
I thought the first 2 parts of the story were a little slow going and repetitive, but the story really picked up at the end.
This book did not go where I expected at all.
I really liked Connie Willis' Oxford Time Travel series, so I decided to try this one. It's a good story but it's also very different from that series.
The strongest part of this book is the characters. They're well written and realistic. There's also a good mystery about what's actually going on with the near-death experiences that the main character has.
My only criticism is that the book starts to drag around the halfway mark, and doesn't really pick back up until about three quarters of the way through. The last quarter is good, but the book could use a little trimming so that you get there faster.
It was engaging from start to finish.
The continuous wonder concerning the NDEs and where they were going.
Not so much. It is so repetitive. I know that is part of the literary device, but I felt like I was trapped in the rat-maze hospital with these people and I just wanted it to be over. I also felt like the "big revelation" wasn't much of a revelation at all.
I have to say, the descriptions were vivid and the characters were relatively well rounded. I enjoyed it but I expected a bit more from the plot line than the endless repetition.