Of course, but not based on this one.
Not sure. I simply disagree with how he took the book. It amounts to a disagreement on the definition of "free will" which maybe I can't really hold against the book. I was thoroughly disappointed in the depth of his reasoning and the scope of his thought. The book feels like the first 1/3 was leading to something then you are never taken anywhere special. This book should have been 30% the size it is even though its small to begin with.
The part where the woman stands in front of a target with an apple on her head and...
Whenever an author brings up an example of someone else's opinion you have never heard of to contrast with their own, and doesn't successfully defend his point of view against it, one is left feeling let down (in this case Daniel Dennett). Of course free will is nonsensical as we commonly think of it, but instead of stating that directly and moving on, Sam Harris gets stuck in first gear with simply "we don't have free will".
I was on the fence before about free will, but now there is no question in my mind. Everyone should read this book.
How anyone can dispute the points Harris makes in this book is beyond me. Really good book about a complex topic. Sam makes many attempts to illustrate the illusion of free will. I think I understood his arguments and can acknowledge the strong possibly that I have no free will, yet it still feels like I make independent choices everyday. This book will be replayed several times and I plan to discuss it with friends. Thanks Dr. Harris. Please continue to do what you do.
"Free Will" left me thinking "of course - I already knew that intuitively"... but did I? I'm now questioning every thought that pops into my head (not really lol). This book is sure to anger the religious and non-religious conservatives for differing, but sometimes overlapping reasons. I loved this book. Probably because I have never felt actually and really in control of my thoughts and now I can say "neither are you!" haha!
Why did Sam Harris even write a book on this? It could have been said in one sentence: "When you think you are making a decision you are really just giving in to whatever physiological impulse is stronger." He basically says this over and over for an hour +. Absolutely did not have to turn this into a book.
I love how Sam Harris delivers thought provoking concepts with ease and clarity while also presenting opposing views. Anymore it's rare for an author, with such a definitive position as Mr. Harris has, not to belittle those who think differently. Thanks for another look into your insights.
Sam Harris presents good arguments in a way that comes off as passionate but reasonably objective. This was not a long listen, but a worthwhile short listen that stirred things up and made me think.