Of the books that were accepted into the New Testament canon, Revelations was the most controversial. Elaine Pagels traces the early history of Revelations in the context of the other controversial books that did not make it into the canon, most particularly the books deemed heretical and which were lost until copies were found in the Egyptian desert in 1945 at Nag Hammadi.
Pagels traces the changes in how each generation in the early centuries of Christianity interpreted Revelations, and how these interpretations were used in the politics of the early church. It was these political issues that caused Revelations to be included in the canon, whereas other, similar books of prophesy were declared heretical.
Pagels brings broad research to bear on her subject, producing a fascinating, illuminating, and comprehensible history that's a must-read for anyone interested in the history of early Christianity.
I got this book because I have always been fascinated at people's interpretations to the book of Revelations. This book does a thorough job of detailing the history of the book to the point of it's inclusion in the bible. But what I was looking for was what has happened since then. The description of the book seemed to hint that this would be discussed but sadly it was not. If you looking for an examination of Revelations and some of the early history this will definitely fit the bill.
Elaine Pages does an excellent job at explaining Revelations as it pertained to the time in which it was written, as well as how how pliant its visions have been to those looking for relevance in their own time. More than just pointing out common misconceptions of authorship, Pagels' goes into detail about the historical and political circumstances leading to the inclusion of Revelation to John in the Christian canon. As in her book, The Gnostic Gospels, we are presented with a picture as to why other texts didn't make it into the canon. Good read for those interested in early Christian history.
My husband & I share the account. Anything on history is his read. I'm more into fiction/zombie & apocalyptic reads.
Topic was very interesting. Narration was also done well. Interesting to make the connection of what was going on during the period when it was written and some of it's meaning.
Excellent scholarship and well presented. The narrator's deep voice was a bit irritating, but the CONTENT of the book was fascinating. Of course, if one is a bible-literalist, this will not be the book for you. I can see myself reading (listening?) to this book again, and still getting something out of it, it is so packed with information and dates, etc.
Yes, I would listen again. There is so much information that requires reexamination of other sources. The author (one of my favorite biblical scholars) puts John's book into a historical context and demonstrates how the author drew upon the Hebrew Bible. i found myself wanting to study the Book of Daniel.
Only criticism is that later chapters that go into early Church history, It was a good brief overview for people not that familiar with such history. For myself, I had just read several books and listen to lectures on early Church history, Thus to me those chapters did not contain any new insights or information. But well worth the listen.
I would listen to Revelations again because there are references to gnostic materials that I want to hear again.
I would compare it to Stranger Magic by Marina Warner. Primarily because they approach the material of myth in a broad, carefully considered manner.
When I drive, I read... uhm listen. I like SciFi, Fantasy, some Detective and Espionage novels and Religion. Now and then I will also listen to something else.
Elaine Pagels links the book of Revelation with her field of speciality, the Nag Hammadi texts. She reconstructs a different overview of the early Christian Church over the first three centuries of its existence.
I thought that she had an excellent command of the subject matter. However it is clear that her work on the Nag Hammadi translations has coloured her understanding and reconstruction so much that it might as well be just as skew if not more than the traditional account of Christian beginnings.
I found that she works chronologically in an eclectic way. It seems that when it suits her reconstruction, she might mention the date when a work was written. She sketches a very different picture of early Christianity than the one Evangelical and Protestant/Roman Catholic/Orthodox Christians might be used to. What makes her book so difficult is that you can really check how far certain of her facts correlate.
While I think she sees too much diversity in the New Testament books, (i.e. John of Patmos is actually a Jewish Prophet and not a Christian in the stricter sense of the word), she makes an interesting case and engaging construction of earliest Christianity until the time the New Testament was canonized.
I am not able to evaluate her reconstruction as it needs a bit of time. At times she was very convincing at other times opportunistic. Yet this short study needs to be taken not of.
I didn't like Lorna Raver's preaching voice, although she read clearly and with feeling at times.
I will probably not listen to another of Elaine Pagels books again. It seems that she herself is very sympathetic towards the Gnostics, trying to find a way if making them part of the general acceptable Christianity of today.