clear and thorough
The clarity of description and narration.
They just make it easier to ingest.
all from nothing
Krauss is a good writer and narrator.
Faced with mindless duty, when an audio book player slips into a rear pocket and mini buds pop into ears, old is made new again.
Lawrence M. Krauss may be an excellent physicist but as an author he is an emperor with no clothes.“A Universe from Nothing” is a fatuous exploration of physics because it fails to explain physics to the general public. Krauss either presumes the public knows enough physics to backup his generalizations or Krauss is unable to make his points clear. This reviewer believes it is more of the latter than the former. Krauss castes allusions to literature that compound his ineptitude as a writer; i.e. the only saving grace of the book is its epilogue, written by Richard Dawkins and performed by Simon Vance.
This is a disappointing book because too many words were used to make one relatively clear point, that something can come from nothing but one still wonders where that nothing came from. One realizes understanding is a two way street. It may be the listener’s deficiency rather than the writer’s skill but as S.I Hayakawa once noted, communication is the responsibility of the communicator because the communicator has control of the conversation; particularly true in the case of a book where there is no opportunity for question.
I love just a few things... Family, Drumming, Baseball, and Intellect.
Easily among the best.
The way he says Gawd (God to the rest of us)... Just humored me.
The ease of the discussion of the message...
One answer to One Big Question...
Excellent audiobook. The author has a good pace and voice for the topic.
Not books so much as the rebooted "Cosmos" series with Neil DeGrasse Tyson. If Cosmos could be considered a 101 class in astrophysics - this would be the 300 level course.
Hearing the author's voice is always beneficial. Hearing what excites him about the work adds to the experience.
of course the stuff in here is quite good but not for the average person to understand clearly, unlike Brian Greene who explains things in very simple terms this was a bit complicated physics terms and difficult to understand for the common person
I really enjoy books like “A Short History of Nearly Everything” and “A Brief History of Time.” When I saw this book I thought it would be true to the title and tell me how the universe can go from nothing to something. Sadly the book does not follow through. Krauss keeps getting distracted with his hatred of religion and trying to prove the universe was not created. According to him, whenever an atheist scientist is proven wrong it is and evolution of knowledge. When a religious scientist is proven wrong it is an indication of ignorance. He takes great joy in pointing out those that he considers ignorant. Too bad more of his energy was not applied to the proposed subject of the book. Science with an agenda is never as accurate as scientific observation and presentation with an open mind.
Step away from following scientists' explanations of the universe for a couple of years, and you'll find yourself years, or lightyears, behind. That's what I did, while I merely inhabited the universe for a while. Krauss does a great job with his own read, just like lectures he gives, explaining what's currently understood about the universe, and the evidence for it.
Creationists will find some points of argument against their view, but the book is not about creationism or otherwise. It's about observations which explain how the universe got to be what it is now (or was when the light we're seeing now started travelling toward us).
I started relistening almost as soon as I finished the first time, to bring into sharper focus the ideas which were new. This is one book which may be ideal for Whispersync. I wouldn't want to miss the author/lecturer's audible explanations, but it would be nice to have the print to review ideas already presented.
This book stimulated me to listen to the humorous and also recommended A User's Guide to the Universe, which helped round out my understanding of current concepts in cosmology.
Lawrence's interview on Colbert gave me the impression that I would learn something about nothing. Mostly this a summary of modern cosmology with too much talk about religion. Apparently, Lawrence wants to be the Dawkins of cosmology. Everything he had to say about nothing he covered in the 3 minutes with Colbert.
I loved the science. "Nothing is unstable!"
There are no spoiler here. The ending is just more of the science.
It is always nice to hear the author tell their own strory
The authors constant need to talk about god moved me to dislike the book. I don't think that science is about whether god exists or not.
His whining about religion and why God doesn't need to exist. Who cares? Just give us the science and theories about how the universe formed. If he had done that the book would have been enjoyable. I got really tired of him trying to convince me why I should stop believing in God, and telling me how much religion has derailed science.
Full House: The Spread of Excellence from Plato to Darwin by Stephen Jay Gould.
Voices and pace were okay.
Does not apply.