Where was her story? Who was she?
That he was a serious drug addict
All of it
Pick a side. Be a public person or be a private citizen. Free country. Her story seemed more about other people and very judgmental, I might add. It made me dislike a revered adored first lady. I suppose I am to young to see her as more than a victim in a blood stained pink suit and I guess I wanted to hear more than her ridiculing people. She seemed to think the people who idolized her were simple housewives who had nothing better to do but imitate a rich, regal woman who definitely comes across as condescending and snooty.
It just was not as interesting as I antcipated. Could not finish listening to the entire book. It was too much of an inside conversation for me to follow.
Book is probably valuable for historians, but not the lay reader like myself.
No narrator. Interview format. I enjoyed hearing Jackie's voice, but I did not have enough knowledge to understand a lot of what Jackie and the interviewer were discussing.
Not a good listen.
There is no Frigate like a Book To take us Lands away Nor any Coursers like a Page Of prancing Poetry – Emily Dickinson
Basically, listening to this was 2/3 very boring and about 1/3 interesting facts about the inside life and feelings of the Kennedys. I had to force myself to keep listening, as the rewards were intermittent. I thought it would be good to listen to it on the heels of the Stephen King book, 11-22-63, and I suppose that did add to the feelings I had about the book. But, for one thing, the quality of the audio from back in that time period was really bad. SO, it was not nearly as easy to listen to as any other audio book I???ve ever listened to. It was a strain through the whole thing. Sometimes you could hear airplanes flying overhead which nearly drowned out the conversations! Sometimes I couldn???t quite hear the name of the person being discussed, and I didn???t feel like working too hard to go back and figure it out, since it seemed sort of boring in today???s context. Now I see there is a PDF file, which I???ve downloaded and looked at, with ALL the names of people mentioned in the book. That does help. AND the photos in the PDF file are fantastic!!
The best part about the book was hearing Jackie???s inside take on whom she and Jack liked and disliked and some of the interesting, inside info from their White House years. For example, when Sukarno, president of Indonesia, was visiting, he showed them a huge books of photos, and it turned out to have lots of semi-naked women whom he would explain were his succession of various wives! Jackie said she and Jack glanced at each other and could hardly keep from laughing out loud. I just looked Sukarno up in the ???Notes,??? and it says he was widely known for his lust and corruption!
I guess one thing I missed in this book was a little more about Jackie???s life. The focus was mainly on the President, and I just thought the whole tone was a bit removed and not emotional enough??? or something like that. In the PDF notes I found this info, which I find so sad and touching about Jackie, and it humanizes her a bit more, I think.
[ Mrs. Kennedy did not know (Prime Minister Harold) Macmillan remotely as well as the President had, but after Kennedy???s death, she achieved a moving kind of intimacy with her husband???s British friend by letter. At the end of January 1964, at midnight, she wrote Macmillan by hand in response to his condolence letter:
???Sometimes I become so bitter, only alone???I don???t tell anyone???but I do truly think that any poor school child looking at the record of the 1960s???could only decide that virtue is UNrewarded. The two greatest men of our time, you and Jack???all you fought for and cared about together. . . . And how does it all turn out? De Gaulle is there . . . and bitter old Adenauer???and the two people who have had to suffer are you and Jack. . . . You worked together for the finest things in the finest years???later on when a series of disastrous Presidents of the United States, and Prime Ministers who were not like you, will have botched up everything???people will say ???Do you remember those days???how perfect they were???? The days of you and Jack. . . . I always keep thinking of Camelot???which is overly sentimental???but I know I am right???for one brief shining moment there was Camelot???and it will never be that way again. . . . Please forgive this endless intrusion???but I just wanted to tell you how much Jack loved you???and I have not his gift of concision.???
Macmillan replied, ???My dear Friend???this is how I used to write to Jack???so I am going to write to you. You have written from your heart to me, and I will do the same??? Of course one becomes bitter. How could you not be? . . . May God Bless you, my dear child. You have shown the most wonderful courage to the bitter outer world. The hard thing is really to feel it inside.??? On June 1, 1964, the day before this oral history interview, Jacqueline reported to Macmillan that she was feeling better now and the worst had passed. Later she wrote him that she was trying to raise her children as Jack would have wished???and that if she prevailed, then that would be her vengeance against the world. (This was one reason why, in later years, Jacqueline was particularly cheered when told by friends that she had succeeded as a mother.) ]
I know things were different in the 60's....but have a hard time relating to Jackie... thought she was more of an independent woman ...
loved the information of President Kennedy's reactions to different historic figures... glad he didn't like De Gaulle ... sad that when he finally met Winston Churchill and it was too late to hold a conservation because of his age.... loved the Truman stories....was really interested in Khrushchev and Missile Crisis...
I hate to say this... but she was always being
Loved the forward with Caroline...
Filtering out the background noise. it is too distracting.
No, I'll give others a chance, but I doubt I'll be finishing this. I've tried several times to get through it and I just can't.
This doesn't apply because the novelty of this book is it is actual tapes of conversations. I was a child when Jackie Kennedy was in the white house, so I didn't pay much attention to her voice or her cadence. Listening to this, ugh! Just not my "cup of tea".
Hard to say, being it is actual tapes of her conversation, but I felt like the whole thing was so disjointed. And the gentleman seemed to have more to say than Jackie. Also, there were so many times I tried to replay what she said because I can hardly hear or understand her, but it is so hard to rewind and find the right spot, that I'd give up.
I have a lot of respect and admiration for Caroline Kennedy. I was really hoping to be moved by this book. Unfortunately I feel I got nothing out of it except annoyed.
I understand that Jacqueline Kennedy was fairly young and newly widowed when these tapes were made but, really, how snarky and nasty can even a 1950s high society wife be? This has significantly changed my opinion of Jacqueline Kennedy and not for the good. The historical background information and perspective, while clearly warped, is the only reason I continued after the first hour of the listening to her snarky, back-biting and mean-spirited comments about at least half of the people and situations.
I'm not sure whether or not Caroline Kennedy should be commended for allowing her mother's words been heard without editing, nasty comments and all. I'm not sure I would have wanted her memory sullied by her own words. It's sad.
a lover of books and finer things
Unless you are intimately aware of the players inside and outside of the Kennedy's circle when the President was killed your going to be asking "Who?". Jackie didn't seem to know too much about the political goings on at the time and couldn't answer many of the questions posed to her. Other than to say that she wasn't apart of the situation, she was busy being pregnant or with the kids. So what is the point of asking her about the President if she didn't know anything. Truthfully, there doesn't seem to be much reason to keep these tapes underwraps for 50 years because she didn't say much of anything. I deleted the book before it finished.
It appeared to me that Ms. Kennedy really knew very little about politics or the work her husband was doing. She often had to ask the interviewer what had happened because she did not know. Since she knew so little about what was going on, I felt that the information that she spoke of contributed little to what we should know about those events and that period. It was nice to hear her voice, though. I just found the book boring after about an hour.