Mysterious, adventure, timeless
Meg because she is stubborn and inquisitive and determined.
She was very expressive and got into the role of each character.
Yes, when her father returned after being gone a long time.
Really good fiction read. Not for younger children who might scare easily. Highly recommend for Sci-fi enthusiasts.
The religious overtones were a bit much. Sometimes it felt more like an indoctrination than an article.
I actually like the passages before they went time-traveling most, especially Mrs. Whatsit's visit to the Murray home.
No. I don't mind someone narrating slowly for clarity, but she drew out each word so long that she robbed entire sequences of movement and pacing. The impersonation of Calvin and Mrs. Whatsit were good, but Meg was absolutely horrible, as was her mother. Charles was only a little bit better. As I listened to the inconsistent and distracting reading of Meg, I thought that Davis was ruining the book for me. THEN, Mrs. Which was introduced and I almost could not take it any longer. Thiiiiis Isssssss Awwwwwwfullllll. The funny thing is the text would often describe how words were spoken, angrily, excitingly, reprovingly, etc. 80% of the time, the way this narrator read the words was nothing like the way L'Engle described them. I have seldom encountered a narrator that did such a disservice to the story.
Yes. The listening time was very short, actually.
This is one of my favorite books of all time. It is extremely well written, clever, and exciting. I like how it is not so long that you loose interest, and not too short where the story isn't getting moved along at a good pace. Thank you for getting a new narrator because the other one's voice got really old quick. Also, thanks to Madeline L'Engle for writing such a good book! =D
We enjoyed this story very much. Unfortunately, we did NOT care for Mrs Witch's voice, at all! Understandably, it was intentionally "strange", however, it was too distracting. Never the less, it was a great book to listen to while driving.