Give yourself the best Christmas present ever;download this book and and listen while cooking and washing all those dishes. You won't even mind that others are watching good football or the original Scrooge on TV. Cannot believe that this is Mr.Mitzner's first legal thriller. He is a natural at this game and you will not be disappointed! Narration is equally as fine.
Don't know what I want to be when I grow up. Trip's cool though. Use Audible to make gym-training sane... And rip my imagination.
OK... during the read I kept muttering, "Damn! Didn't see that coming!"
Mitzner's plotting is magnetic. You know, the kind of story that keeps you listening in the driveway after the ride home? This story will create an interest that will conflict with whatever else you've got to do besides listen to the next part. It's hard to believe that the guy who started out with this novel fell so far apart with his next, "A Case Of Redemption." I'm glad that I gave Mitzner another chance with this novel but I'm still sorry I read the just barely redeemable succeeding book from this guy,
David LeDoux reads this gaggle of conundrums invisibly... which is to say he never intrudes, yet presents powerfully, which is an impressive talent. Conundrums? Over and above the essential legal mysteries here, the theme swirls around questions of family, fidelity, culture, and society's rules regarding actions and consequences. It's provocative questions will haunt you yet not subtract from the entertainment values.
Titles that should be made or remade into film by Amazon or Netflix... Department Q. Harry Hole. Noble House. Tai-pan. Gai-jin and Shogun.
...on a man who did him no harm.
Alex Miller is a tall, attractive, brilliant attorney in one of New York's most prestigious firms. He is married to a beautiful woman who loves him passionately. They have a lovely and precocious young daughter. He goes all out to sacrifice all of this in order to further his career while pursuing another beautiful woman. But that's the best part of Alex.
In the end this is a story of revenge, yet Alex has never been harmed. He cheats, he lies, he whines, and then he destroys the life of a man who did him no harm.
To be fair, there are clever twists in the plot. But in the end we are left with a hero with no character. Worse still, he seems to have no hope of redemption.
I love to read books set in interesting places or historical settings. I especially love mysteries and thrillers.
I enjoy legal thrillers very much. This is not on the same level as Michael Connelly, John Grisham or Steve Martini, but it is a very good first start for this author. I do recommend the book and look forward to his next book. What I found interesting was the excellent description of a partner's life in a large NYC law firm and the build up of a large scale financial fraud legal case. I learned a great deal from that part of the book. The case, however, was not a "thriller", but I did look forward to each session listening to the book. You have to get well into the book before there is a death that affects the story. That is when things started to move rapidly with the story. There are some good twists and turns in the end, but if you follow this type of book regularly, you should get a feel for the story before all is revealed. The narration was excellent. Adam Mitzner made the story flow really well and the variety of voices did not distract to the narration. I hope I get to hear more from this narrator.
I have no idea. I would recommend replacing this question. Recognize that there are two types of "readers". I am not sure how many people read the print version of a story of which they have listened to the audio version. There may be some out there who read a portion of a book and also listen to it as they complete it. Not sure. I would prefer a different question aimed at a review of the story content and not its format. Perhaps this question is better directed to an editor or publisher.
Cannot think of any similar book for comparisons.
Why are Some readers are bit hard on this narrator? I have definitely heard worse readers. Mr. LeDoux's strength is when he just reads the words without interpretation or "acting". With the exception of his characterization of Charlotte, (I detest it when men try to sound like a 5 year old female.)I enjoyed his reading. A nice break from favs Scott Brick and Dick Hill for me.
There was no laughter or crying in this book. There were parts of this story that were way too long and added nothing to the story. I also moved to extreme dislike of Elizabeth from being sympathetic of her. She strongly and quickly moved from being a character in the background to one totally in front and in control. Elizabeth and Michael are in my opinion the same character, just different genders.
Great advertisement for this one. Some exaggeration that attracted a lot of readers. This story kept me interested and engaged in the story during a winter weekend. As one reviewer suggested, it is good to listen to while cleaning house, wrapping gifts or preparing a meal. Decent story, but not a thriller in any sense of the word. Also I would not put in the same group with Grisham et.al. Being an attorney and an author does not necessarily make one a great writer about criminal related stories. Mitzner wove a good story with enough "stuff" to keep you thinking. There are a few surprises and also some crazy stuff that makes the reader ask why is this in the story? It comes across as very amateurish. I did not find much of the storyline predictable. I did not care much for any of the characters except for Alex's father, who we only know through the words of others. The father is the only innocent and decent character in the entire story.
I enjoyed this one a lot, in fact I stopped early at red lights to make sure I could listen a bit longer! Some of the plot was foreseeable but there where many minor twists and turns that kept the book at a very good pace. It’s not a thriller in the typical sense, but that’s nice for a change, and you get more character development here. Looking forward to the next book from this author.
I have to agree with Richard San Anselmo's review. He put it better than I can.
the narration was fine
Kneel Before Zod!!
Not really, because it has a lot going on and doesn't seem to end.
He was okay, not horrible.
Lifetime Movie of the week: A Conflict of Intrest
Old Broad with Keyboard
I'm not sure who would be interested in this book despite the wonderful ratings it got. Did anyone actually listen to it???
Not sure but hopefully something with enough action to keep me awake.
Although the narrator tried to interject some movement with the tone of his voice, he failed. I made it through the first hour of this book with NO action other than the ordinary comings & goings of an ordinary lawyer leading an ordinary life. I've nodded off twice as I listened.
A self-loathing narcissist that is capable of lying to themselves and the people around them.
I thought that the performance was well done, there was just nothing to work with.
I thought that the premise wasn't bad, but there are too many holes in the plot. How do the police let someone be buried within three days of their death if they suspect foul play? The foundation for murder is so weak and implausible that no conviction would have ever been possible.
Rewrite the book and try and somehow make Alex likeable.