Pinker answers a lot of questions about how and why people think the way they do. As always, he doesn't just make assertions, he backs everything up by explaining the state of the research and the ideas of the researchers in the field (even when those ideas are different from his). It's a much easier read than actual research papers, and has wit and good story telling to leven the large doses of information, but it's not easy to follow when listening. It requires a lot of concentration or you can do what I did and just listen to everything twice, sometimes three times, until you get it.
If you consider yourself an intellectual, you'll want to be familiar with Stephen Pinker's work. The Better Angels of our Nature, and The Blank Slate are easier to pick up just listening once so I would recommend one of those as a place to start.
This book was written more than 10 years ago. It's holding up very well though and an afterword written only a couple of years ago is included which explains how recent research relates to the book.
Yes, I'd definitively recommend it to friends. The book is very interesting, but Pinker got the title wrong. The book explains very well WHAT the mind works, and WHY does it make sense that the mind does what it does. But the book NEVER explains HOW the mind does it.
The most interesting is the variety of topics covered in the book. Full with interesting specific cases and references to studies.
The least interesting is the lack of substance in the theory of How the mind works. Pinker basically pushes 3 ideas through: 1) natural selection, 2) the mind is made up of organs like the rest of the body, 3) the analogy of the mind as a computational device
As much as those ideas are interesting, they are old and well accepted. So, the book is just a nice way to put them together, but without bringing any new argument to the discussion.
The performance of Mel Foster was outstanding.
This is one of my favorite books, and the audio format does not disappoint. If you're interested about human nature, why we are the way we are, why we're so smart, why we're conscious, and even why fools fall in love, this book is for you. (But be warned, this book is for people who like to think; don't expect to breeze through it like a malcom gladwell book.) Also, one recommendation: unless you're really interested in visual perception, I would recommend skipping the chapter called "The Mind's Eye," as it is hard to follow in audio format without the pictures, and it is the most technical chapter.
Yes, there's. Lot in here, some 25 hours worth of listening, and I want to come ack and listen to some things again!
The development of the sexual brain the differences in the sexual mind was very interesting indeed. It's easy to forget out behaviour and preferences were actually established during our extended hunter gatherer lifestyle, and how this fashioned our behaviour from an evolutionary perspective
Easy to listen to. Always run at 1.5x
Certainly made me think.
Love Steven Pinker, and would like to just read more. It's so refreshing to hear all the concepts related back to actual studies! I enjoyed this as much as the Blank Slate, possibly more.
College English professor who loves classic literature, psychology, neurology and hates pop trash like Twilight and Fifty Shades of Grey.
In this wonderfully informative and entertaining book on the human thought process, the source of emotions, sexual desire and everything else this marvelous three pound lump of spam in our head does for us, Pinker writes in the intelligent but amazingly amusing and witty style that makes him one of the greatest translators of complex science into lay terms, in the main because he does so without compromising or dumbing-down in the process. It is no wonder that this man is considered one of the greatest minds of our time. Buy the book and find out how his, and everyone else's works--and why.
I got this audiobook on sale for $4.95 and probably wouldn't have gotten it otherwise. I really liked Eagleman's Incognito, Lehrer's How We Decide, Nørretranders' User Illusion and even Kahneman's plodding Thinking Fast and Slow, so How the MInd Works seemed like a good fit. The author is not particularly interested in how the mind actually works (and when he does talk about the mechanisms of thinking, he gets terribly bogged down in computer programming minutiae). The book is actually about evolutionary biology, and Pinker spends a huge amount of the book bashing feminists and sociologists. The book was written in the 90's, so the author had probably been on the receiving end of a lot of fuzzy thinking about everything being socially constructed, but his harping makes the book seem incredibly dated (especially compared to the User Illusion, which still seems very fresh). I would also say that as the mother of a truck-loving toddler girl who has been told by other mothers that "girls don't like trucks," I see gender roles being socially constructed every day.
Based on scientifically determined information with a clear examples of the scientific method.
Performance is difficult in a work of this sort which presents a lot of scientific information. Difficult territory, meticulous, and matter of fact.
Summarizes a lot of material and information without tying all together, but that may be a function of the information which doesn't fit into a neat easily summarized comprehensive thesis.
Insightfull, Profound, Unstable
The concept about the diferent modes that the brain processes information is interesting, still I think needs a little polishing.
The narratives of personal experiences are very interesting when heard with the tone of voice of the person that experienced them.
It is a profound book with many concepts which I prefered digesting in various sesions. I listen to it while jogging and it was perfect.
Very detailed and most concepts are supported by examples, still there are some times that ideas were presented without too much support.
This book took me longer than average to get through, but I think it was well worth the undertaking. Slow going to start, but was rewarded for persistence through the pretty dense times. Chapter 1 felt never-ending, just a prolonged overview and intro it seemed, and the next chapters went on and on about the evolutionary aspects of how are brains developed, only finally making its ultimate justification for the discussion afterwards when I was losing patience for the topic. In fact, based on some of the negative reviews on audible, it makes me think they only got that far. I was rapt for the chapter all about the visual processes, leading off with some incredibly cool stuff about illusions and what we *don't* see and what we think we see... That is the kind of thing I think is really interesting and love to hear more about. Later chapters delved into family and social theory, which I am less riveted by but still find interesting.
I liked the approach Pinker took, and how he drew attention to or gave new perspectives to lots of everyday phenomena - how we look at paintings, why/how relationships develop, what is funny, and even how we think about thinking and try to explain the unexplainable. He gave a logical progression, building on topics from introducing the foundational theory (which was referred to and relied on throughout) and working through the various levels of the brain, how we make sense of the world and interact with it, how we make sense of others and interact with them, and how we have fun and find meaning in it all.
My particular interests were in the sections on perception, vision, language, and even a little in his brief discussion of the arts, fiction and music. I loved the time and detail he devoted to stereograms (which he mentions in the afterword as his favorite part)- not only could I visualize everything, but I actually recalled playing with stereoscopes as a kid, even an early 20th century one with photo panel inserts of Paris and other European destinations, just like he described. I was less keen on the long discussions of the evolutionary theory (mostly because I had some familiarity with it already, but it was clear he made the effort not to be misunderstood by creationists or people misconstruing the role of genes in our daily motives) and the chapter on family and social theory, though I thought it was well laid out; I have always found certain aspects of personality and social psychology to be interesting or illuminating, I just them less intriguing and cool than cognition.
Also a great part of his argument structure that i could appreciate - the computer science and mathematical metaphors he employed in explaining the information processing. I am sure my familiarity with the topics helped me get more out of some of the discussions, but I am sure his overall style would be accessible to a novice who was willing and able to take this book on, as he often gives clear explanations of new ideas and seems to assume no level of expertise. I found myself wanting more from the discussion on language than he gave, but then he dedicated an entire book to that topic, which I will be delving into soon.
A hefty and occasionally dense read, but sprinkled with lots of fun or interesting tidbits and pop culture references to keep it lively. Narrator did wonderfully giving voice to the style.
Trying to support 1) the comparably smaller non-fiction selection and 2) the few here that are not misinformation. Got mind? Use it.
My approach is to take notes/bookmark throughout the book the first time, so I can refer to certain sections in the future.
Definitely has enough info in this book to be a textbook, but fortunately it is a more enjoyable read.
Steven Pinker's other masterpiece "The Blank Slate" is still my favorite non-fiction. "How the Mind Works" is a more technical and challenging read/listen, but both are highly recommended based on their wealth of researched facts and arguments.
Probably the best way to absorb "How the Mind Works" is to read it. I found myself rewinding multiple times to re-listen to the more technical parts. Be prepared to exercise your mind, and you will be rewarded.
For an easier listen, "The Blank Slate" is just as informative; it is more on societal impact of our understanding on the mind rather than the technical mind mechanisms explored in this book.