The first 1/2 to 3/4 of the story was great. But then it turned strange with no apparent reason for it or build up. So far fetched. I was lost and confused
In the lower half of my list.
I haven't listened to others by Jonathan Carrol. Probably won't now.
Saxony. She seemed interesting, but not fleshed out. I'm a researcher (as she was) and I'd be fascinated to know how she found out some of her facts. (That point is never addressed.)
Many people on here have said that they would like to take Thomas (the main character) out to dinner. But I found him very self-serving. I don't think I would have enjoyed the dinner at all. He probably would have angered me and in a juvenile way to get back at him, I probably would have spent the whole dinner talking about his father and what a great actor he was. (That won't make sense to anyone who hasn't read the book.)
I bought this book in error. I ran across a review of author Neil Gaiman and wanted to read some of his work. I ran his name through Audible and found a couple, including this one. Once I purchased it, I found that it wasn't written by him but only on his suggested list.
I finished this book over a week ago and I'm still shaking my head. Various points pop up into memory and start me off again. I argue with myself over whether I should return the book for a refund or if I liked it.
If you ask me if I'm sorry that I read it, I would have to say no. (Unlike "Albert Nobbs" where I not only wanted my money back for the cost, but also wanted the hours of my life back that it took to finish it.) If you asked if I would purchase it again, knowing what I know now, I would have to say no.
At least the narrator was very good.
The reviews are divided on this book, so it seems you will have to judge for yourself.
I loved it, but I think it requires a particular 'type' of person to enjoy it.
English majors and well-read 'eccentrics' will enjoy.
They're all terrible. Which is why I enjoyed it. I suppose Saxony is almost likable. Really, a good 'horrible' character is my favorite type.
The perfect privileged, pretentious, professorial speaking style. Seriously, he takes a somewhat loathsome character and makes him smugly pitch perfect. Applause!
Nails the dog. You'd have to read the book to find out.
As always, if you like to loathe your characters, you'll like this. Thomas is so delightfully, unwittingly narcissistic and inconsiderate, and it is fun to see what is going on in his head.
I would delete the last few paragraphs. It doesn't spoil any of the ending for me to say that the final scene of the book was more or less unnecessary, and the twist therein left more more frustrated and annoyed than pleased. The story ended with a triumphant finish, then there was an epilogue, and then the epilogue got its own finish that didn't really work for me.
More importantly, I would speed up the pace of the first part of the book. By a lot. A real lot. I feel like this would have been an absolutely amazing short story, but was only a so-so novel. I stuck it out because I wanted to see what Neil Gaiman so admired about it, and I started listening in the first place because the premise sounded so cool. Someone starts writing a biography of his childhood hero, and things start getting weird. Great. I'm sold. A whole town full of people who know their own futures? Awesome. Bring on showing me the psychological implications of that, both for them and for an outsider coming in. BUUUUUT, see the next part of this review for the reason for my three stars.
The premise was wonderful. Unfortunately, the book is divided into three parts, and the premise *does not even appear until part three*. The first few pages were very misleading. The protagonist collects creepy masks and meets a mysterious woman who shares one of his obscure interests and hand-carves creepy marionettes? Yes please. Tell me more. Instead, for the next five of eight total hours, I got to listen to them doing some preliminary research, finding a few contradictory details, moving to a sleepy Midwest town, and finding out some more mundane things. I spent most of those five hours wondering when the interesting part would come, and re-checking the description of the book to make sure I hadn't accidentally gotten the wrong one. Sure, it was "good writing" and I appreciate that, and the voice actor did a great job, but about 2/3 of the story was utterly uninteresting to me. What I was expecting to be the bulk of the book was actually an extended conclusion... It was a very good conclusion, sure, but the excessive build-up left a sour taste in my mouth.
Depends on what the trailers played up. If they billed it as an obsessed biographer losing his grip on reality in the midst of a love triangle, not a chance. Pass. If they billed it as a biographer accidentally discovering a town full of impossible things, perhaps. But I doubt I'd feel like I got my $14 worth.
What I love most about this book is that you've simply no idea what genre it is for the majority of the narrative. Halfway through and deeply invested in the tale you wonder... Will this be a fantasy story or are we simply along for the ride in our own world, relating so intimately with a protagonist who deeply loves a children's book author about whom little is known? The story is very well-presented and the characters are fantastic, I wanted more.
I found the story to be entertaining and engaging. The narrator was perfect for the story and I was sorry to have it end...
Thanks to Neil Gaiman for bringing this title to us - I will definitely check our more "Neil Gaiman Presents" selections...
It was a bit like a grown up fairy tale story...
Mr. Ballerini did a masterful job - really brought the story to life.
I have not read the book, but I really enjoyed the intro by Neil Gayman and I loved the way the Narrator read the text.
I have not read something quite like this story and that was what really made my Day!
Anna was my favorite.
Do You Dare to enter this book, Do You dare not to...?
I think the reader made this story better than it really is. He's just really good, without trying to do weird voices or anything. The story itself is rather quirky, but I'm glad I listened to it. Not great, but good.
It has some language that put me off of the story. I used to get ebooks and edit them by replacing offensive words or phrases with something else.
It is unfortunate that publishers/ producers do not accomadate consumers who are sensitive to language.
I found the plot interesting--but did not finish the story due to language.
This is one of those circular plots that make me think that the title should be "Twisted". Good for a philosophical discussion on reality and imagination.