I have not read the print version, but I definitely felt the narrator did an excellent job, and I don't have any complaints about the audio version.
It's similar to Eugenides' other books such as Middlesex as well as Haruki Murakami's novels because it's not just about the story. Eugenides likes to add things such as literary criticism, history, science, philosophy, and religion to the story, so that the book becomes so much more than just a linear plot. You learn so much from the little detours he takes.
Mitchell, which took me aback because I didn't think I'd be able to connect with him.
Eugenides is one who knows how to write delightful, inventive prose. Pittu is an actor who makes the characters alive and gives each one his/her own voice.
The plot takes you back to what it was like being 20 in the eighties, to college, love, trips abroad and the misteries of mind and heart.
high. very interesting, well constructed book
Leonard is the most fully realized character. Eugenides gives more backstory then the other characters.
Awful. He's ok as the narrator, but caricatures the dialog. The women sound like David Sedaris reading Squirrel Seeks Chipmunk. There's an air of disdain toward the women and the authority figures that seems outside of the book itself. I found myself arguing with the narrator.
I don't think the book is perfect, but its pretty darned good.
In the top ten.
Mitchell, who is most like me.
When male readers do prissy for every female voice it makes me want to spit.
The Nobel Prize winner.
I guess I'm a baby...I just love to be read to.
The story sort of fizzles towards the end. I sort of felt like...was that the end? Is there more, hmmm...I guess that was a good book.
Eugenides's condescension towards his characters was only topped by Pittu's voicing of them. Sorry, but I was disappointed in the book, the first I've read by Eugenides. I admit that I stayed till the end---I was interested in what happened to the characters and I was also interested in the milieu (I didn't go to college in the 80's, but I think that the experience of searching for meaning/career/independence is a common one). Another reviewer wrote that Pittu's voices for women was "gay," whatever that means. I found that his voices for both men and women made them seem self-centered and clueless---and his voices for women made them seem even stupider than perhaps Eugenides intended. I can't think of one character in the book who wasn't dense, although I suppose that Mitchell, although pretty pathetic and cluless, at least seemed decent. Madeleine's parents were complete buffoons----like many of his portrayals, this was spelled out in the most obvious way.
It was so well written and held my atttention for all the hours. The characters are interesting. It will make you analyze how literature has affected our view of marriage and romance.
Must make a correction to prior statement. My house is never clean because I am too busy having fun.
Open to new authors, I purchased this based on the reviews...big mistake. Very difficult to get into, stay into and ended somewhat abruptly. Found it to be very disconnected with characters unevenly developed and what seemed to be little or weak plot. But this is a rare dud among many gems from audible. Recommend to spend one tokens elsewhere.
I found the story to be interesting but a little bit slow moving but not bad. I loved Middlesex and didnt quite enjoy this as much but that could be because of my own reasons. Reading about metal illness is so very difficulat and overall I found the book made me incredibly sad. Sad for all the characters unrequited love and seemingly hopeless romantic situations. However the character development was amazing and the descriptions of every situation and detail most exquisite. I would recommend you get this if you are looking for something to stretch the mind a little linguistically but not if you are feeling a bit melancholy.
This would have been a wonderful short story if the hours of snobbish name-dropping had been edited out. The story was all but lost in the authors attempt to prove his own literary expertise.
The narrator did an excellent job characterizing, However his female voices came through as gay rather than authentic female which was distracting.