Interesting story of a real murder at the turn of the century. Shows how the newspapers of the day were given direct access to information, and sometimes impacted the case.Good book - but I have one big criticism. The narrator has an odd way of swallowing some of his constants, particularly "f" and "th" sounds. I don't know if this is an intentional technique - but after a while it was distracting.
I don't like the way the narrator speaks. He had an odd way of "swallowing" his "f"'s and "th" sounds.Stop trying do hard to sound professional. It would have been a more relaxed read if the narrator would just speak naturally - and less like a performance.
I wish we would have heard more about how the Police worked at the time, and less about how the Press worked.
The history was what I liked best. It was a little slow moving.
I don't think that I have listened to other book by Paul Collins.
It was a good performance.
This was interesting. It was about the murder and about the tabloid wars that this murder started. Very interesting times for sure.
Dufris is the star of the show. His reading of Howe, the defense attorney, is amazing. This is a well writing and meticulously research account of a New York City murder and the sensationalist journalism that followed. The plot takes a lot of turns and in enganging thoughout. Once the trial is wrapped up, the book drags on for a few more chapters, and they should be skipped. This was a fun read, but it doesn't educate like most non-fiction. Paul Collins has a gift, but other still master the genre better.
I thought this would be presented as a whodunit, but of course it's more of a documentary, this story has been told before. Even if you have already heard the story of the murder of William Guldensuppe, AKA The Scattered Dutchman, a masterful storyteller and rich details make this one worth a listen.
I liked the fast pace and the descriptions of the New York that was.
Read all about it!
Eclectic, avid listener, favorite book is the one currently in ear.
Quick easy read. Found the relationship between the newspapers, politics, the law and the crime very interesting. "Bones" and "CNN" in the age of no fingerprints and no limits to behavior of journalists selling papers. Did they convict the wrong person?
Story doesn't seem to be very well written
I'm not sure any cuts would help.
Had a hard time finishing this audio.
Business owner , philanthropist.
Very descriptive, good mix of business and murder. I have this picture of a torso stuck in my mind.
Fascinating how much of the news cycle of today draws it roots from events of the past.
The story isn't bad overall. Its just a bad attempt at trying to be a nior murder story while just listing facts. It gets confusing and hard to follow with the monotone narrator.