I might read this book again because of the historical aspects. Learned a lot about the newspaper industry and life in the late 1800's in the U.S.
The historical tie-in.
The reader had a rather uninteresting delivery; I thought he was bored or sleepy.
The rise to prominence of Pulitzer and Hearst and the rivalry between them.
All the details and backgound in a relatively quick read
How time has changed things but things are pretty much the same
Did a great job
The things the media did not report and the things they did
I like how they followed the lifes of the people after the trial
I wanted to try this book but really didn't think it would hold my attention and even wondered if I would finish it. But once I started to listen it had me, it was surprisingly good. I recommend this one.
Sometimes it is good to be reminded there really never were any good old days, that crime is not worse now, and the way the press covers it is not a whit more irresponsible or sensationalized than it used to be.
This in-depth, well-researched book provides a glimpse into New York City's past, and both the murder case and the newspaper rivalry were fascinating subjects.
Interesting story of a real murder at the turn of the century. Shows how the newspapers of the day were given direct access to information, and sometimes impacted the case.Good book - but I have one big criticism. The narrator has an odd way of swallowing some of his constants, particularly "f" and "th" sounds. I don't know if this is an intentional technique - but after a while it was distracting.
I don't like the way the narrator speaks. He had an odd way of "swallowing" his "f"'s and "th" sounds.Stop trying do hard to sound professional. It would have been a more relaxed read if the narrator would just speak naturally - and less like a performance.
I wish we would have heard more about how the Police worked at the time, and less about how the Press worked.
The history was what I liked best. It was a little slow moving.
I don't think that I have listened to other book by Paul Collins.
It was a good performance.
This was interesting. It was about the murder and about the tabloid wars that this murder started. Very interesting times for sure.
Dufris is the star of the show. His reading of Howe, the defense attorney, is amazing. This is a well writing and meticulously research account of a New York City murder and the sensationalist journalism that followed. The plot takes a lot of turns and in enganging thoughout. Once the trial is wrapped up, the book drags on for a few more chapters, and they should be skipped. This was a fun read, but it doesn't educate like most non-fiction. Paul Collins has a gift, but other still master the genre better.
I thought this would be presented as a whodunit, but of course it's more of a documentary, this story has been told before. Even if you have already heard the story of the murder of William Guldensuppe, AKA The Scattered Dutchman, a masterful storyteller and rich details make this one worth a listen.
I liked the fast pace and the descriptions of the New York that was.
Read all about it!
Eclectic, avid listener, favorite book is the one currently in ear.
Quick easy read. Found the relationship between the newspapers, politics, the law and the crime very interesting. "Bones" and "CNN" in the age of no fingerprints and no limits to behavior of journalists selling papers. Did they convict the wrong person?