Wonderfully narrated -- actually one of the best narrators I've ever heard! So many voices were used that it was more like a radio show than a book reading. The story had a very good beginning but it began to drag after a while. Still good... it kept me reading, but I was waiting for more action that did not come. The end was o k a y . Just kind of petered off instead of a real conclusion but there was some interesting philosophy presented, so it was still good. The first and last chapters were the best.
I read many of the reviews that Audible bubbles to the top and was persuaded to give this one a go. This book is called a classic and some of the other reviews dismiss certain criticisms as unwarranted. Well I am here to add my voice to the dissenters.
First the positive. There is certainly an interesting story here about mankind's first contact with a new life form on the planet Solaris. This alien is an ocean and it is so different from our notion of life that it sparks hundreds of years of debate and becomes a new branch of science. We join the story as Kris Kelvin arrives at Solaris station and begins to try to solve the riddle.
Kris meets the other scientists stationed on Solaris and it is obvious right away that something strange is going on. The interactions between the characters can be awkward at times but I can let that slide due to their questionable mental state and the fact that this book is a translation.
However, strewn throughout the book are long periods of time when Kris is searching for clues and reads scientific books and journals that contain theories about Solaris. These range from the philosophical to the scientific. While it is impressive that Stanislaw Lem was able to create so much detail within his story it doesn't make it entertaining to listen to. These boring periods can be oppressive and if you are driving while listening then you risk falling asleep at the wheel. Alessandro Juliani does the characters well enough but he can't bring life to the dead sections of the book.
Combine the long periods of boredom with an unsatisfying ending that feels incomplete and I just can't recommend this one.
I have never read Solaris before but was aware of the criticism over the previous translated versions. My only experience with it were the two movies from 1972 and Clooney's 2002. This last one I strongly advise to skip or you are in danger of forsaken the story definitively.
This new translation is excellent and, as in most cases, goes a lot deeper than 1972's picture.
Solaris is a wonderfully rich story of man's inability to deal with the unknown, both from outside and inside himself. From the unsuccessful attempts to communicate with the living ocean to the disastrous relationships developed with its creations, you are immerse on a elaborated plot that leads to an unsuspected conclusion.
Alessandro's performance is consistent and ads a lot of depth to the telling. He conducts you gracefully trough the book and make it almost impossible to stop listening.
I love reading and listening to books, especially fantasy, science fiction, children's, historical, and classics.
For well over a hundred years, earth scientists have been obsessed by the planet Solaris, or rather by the sentient ocean gelatinously covering it: observing, classifying, experimenting, contacting, analyzing, theorizing, proving, disproving, publishing, and perishing. Despite all that activity (Solaristics), humanity is no closer to understanding the alien life form. As the novel opens the psychologist narrator Kris Kelvin travels to the space station orbiting the alien world to join three scientists in studying Solaris.
If Lem???s novel were a typical science fiction alien contact story, we might expect Kelvin to take stock of the situation, to glean useful clues from the station???s extensive Solaristics library, to energize his colleagues, and then, by making a conceptual breakthrough and utilizing some technological gadgets, to comprehend the oceanic alien and pacify it (if it is inimical) or cooperate with it (if it is friendly). Lem, however, has no interest in telling such a comforting story.
Instead, when Kelvin arrives at the station he finds his colleagues strangely demoralized and anti-social. Disturbed, he skims through various Solaristics tomes, but only confirms the impossible and arrogant folly of the human project to understand a truly alien life form. And then he, like his colleagues, is visited by an unexpected ???Guest??? or ???Ghost,??? a simulacrum of the most important person from his past, apparently sent by the ocean. Is the alien experimenting on the humans? Torturing them? Giving them a gift? Reacting reflexively to their experiments? Communicating with them? The only thing Kelvin knows for sure is that the sentient ocean has read the depths of his mind to find there his strongest guilt and grief.
Solaris reminds us that for all the appeal of space exploration and for all we learn about the universe therein, we may never understand the labyrinthine depths of the human mind; that we can never escape the physical limits of our perception of ourselves and others; and that love is never easy.
The ocean of Solaris is sublime, with beautiful and awesome structures and behaviors. And though my mind did wander during some of the summaries of the many different Solaristics trends and schools, and though I wish the reader Alessandro Juliani (who does a great Snaut and a fine Harey) could have read Kelvin???s voice with more gravitas, I am glad to have listened to this singular, majestic, and moving novel.
My taste differs from kid books to gory horror books.
The critics love it. They say it is profound. They say it is beautiful. It explores the depths of human existence.It stands the test of time.
That is academia speak for it sucks big time. Someone a long time ago, who was high up in academia and who never read a Science Fiction novel in there life, deemed this a classic. All of his minions did not want to seem stupid, so they agreed.
Call me stupid, but I found this a long boring uninspired story. There were some interesting questions brought up, but nothing Heinlein or Asimov have not discussed. The difference being that Heinlein and Asimov are readable. If you are not into science fiction and you love the classics then you can read this love it and pretend you have read science fiction. If you are a true science fiction fan, who loves the wonder of Arthur C. Clarke's writing, you will be very disappointed. This can also be very frustrating. It is one of those books where the main character ask questions, but never gets answers. Everyone is always put off one hour. "Why do you pick your nose with your left hand". Answer "I can't tell you now come back in an hour." An hour later "I don't know why I pick my nose with my left hand, I must be crazy."
I am not trying to be mean, just feel it is my duty to warn others from wasting there money. This is my second and last Lem novel.
I put the narrator on fast play and he still sounded slow. He reads this whole thing in a somber whisper.
74 y o avid reader using either my eyes or ears. I make earrings that I donate to shelters and while I work, I listen to wonderful books
a good story weighed down with too many unnecessary details. Too bad. I got through about half, then gave up trying to sort out story from blah blah blah
Some may enjoy the loooooooonnnnnggggggg descriptions of Solaris. There are almost full chapters devoted to talking about formations on the planet. It bored me to tears. Its sad saying that, because the book just grabbed me right from the beginning.
The start of the book was quite enthralling. It had a twinge of mystery, world building, and character development that really was quite satisfying.
The least interesting - as I mentioned above - was the ad nauseam descriptions of Solaris formations. I would fast forward through minutes and minutes of descriptions, and not miss a single bit of plot.
Some have said it is great...a staple to read. I disagree. I felt there was a lot of potential, but that it was wasted.
Meh - don't listen to the hype - I felt like a huge chunk could have been cut, and we would have lost nothing.
Love excellent narrators like Ray Porter. Love the Joe Ledger series.
Very good performance by narrators. Could feel the bright heat and light of the fierce blue sun and also the orange glow of the deep red sun.
Each actor is narrated well, especially the scene with Liquid Oxygen.
The book itself seems meandering too much. It takes random walks into past and leaves us stranded there for long time.
Juliani is excellent. His narration is the only reason I continued to listen. Sorry Stanislaw, stay in the lab.
The last sentence.
The narration and possibily the concept of a global sized entity.
I waited and waited for the story to develop. All I heard was pontification of nonsense. The storyline could be easily condensed into one 20-30 minute short story. Instead we are exposed to endless theorms of theorems. I listen for entertainment. This was torture.
I am a lover of history and the fantastic tales of human achievement (or folly). Sometimes, a grand author captures my imagination.
I remember many years ago as a child, watching the Russian movie Solaris by director Andrey Tarkovskiy. To tell you the truth, I really did not understand it one little bit. It was a confusing film that nearly put me to sleep. It was hard to grasp and I had a very difficult time understanding the concepts around the ocean and its manifestations. But the story lingered in my mind thereafter and I knew that one day I would have to read Stanislaw Lem’s novel to understand it as an adult. Finally I got to listen to this incredible novel. This is one of the very best science fiction novels ever written. Lem really studies our inner soul and its interaction with the impossible. As you engross yourself in the novel, do not be disappointed that there is no final answer to the mystery of the ocean, but marvel in the way he entices you to answer the questions the protagonist struggles through. What would you do in an event like this? That is really what Lem is asking of you … A must read!