Yes. It was interesting and moving and well narrated. Made me laugh out loud espite its seriousness.
Musicophelia, Awakenings, similar subject matter and same author.
The man who mistook his wife for a hat
Update of the book.
I wish I would have realized how long ago this book was written.
Great author and narrator
All of them
It made me smile and chuckle. Made me appreciate life
If you are reading this review it is because you are interested in the topic. It wont disappoint. The mind is amazing and these stories are as well.
The lady who had been "babied" her whole life that she didn't even know she could do things like feed herself.
The lady mentioned above.
The stories of these people are so interesting, you will be discussing them with your friends.
Even though this book is dated, actually BECAUSE this book is dated it becomes even more interesting! Really worth the read if you are interested in the way our brain's work!
Interesting case studies are presented, but I would have preferred to hear a little more in depth input on the theories of what caused these abnormalities and what malfunctioned in the brain. The collection of stories and cases studies seemed to be rather disconnected to one another. It might have been a better read had they focused on only one aspect of brain malfunction and dove deeper into the symptoms and cause.
I read the print version years ago. Now, having enjoyed the audio version, I'd have to say that both have their merits. It is easier, with the print version, to refer back to previously read information when necessary for clarification purposes. But the audio version was very well done and served as an informative, engaging presentation of Dr. Sacks' experiences, conclusions and philosophical meanderings.
Dr. Sacks was a bright man who thought outside the mental health box, to the great benefit of his patients and to the inspiration of many. His works should be required reading for those involved in the field of psychology and human behavior. I like everything about Dr. Sacks' writings, except for his occasional tendency to get off track and ramble a bit at the end. But his ramblings are better than the musings of most people, so I felt privileged being able to listen to them.
Not a character-driven work. The accounts in this book are of real people. I can't look at them as characters, not in the literary sense.
Not extreme, but I felt a bit sad and nostalgic at times, knowing that Dr. Sacks has passed on. He is missed.
What I like the most about Dr. Sacks and his works is that he looks beyond the usual and the accepted to find the key aspects of a whole person--neurological, conceptual, emotional and spiritual. Each of these aspects of personhood is inextricably interwoven with the other components. The health of any one aspect affects the function of all. Many psychology experts focus on the mental and physical but shy away from the spiritual aspect of life. By spiritual, I don't mean religion, but the actual connection of a person with existence on all levels. Dr. Sacks recognized the wholeness of his patients. He strove to understand and treat people on all their levels of need. His work deserves respect, and emulation.
A different narrator is all this book needed to be a win for me. It has great content. The science and humanity are well represented, but the narrator has no passion, no joy, and worst of all - no inflection.
Narrator is monotonous, slow speaking, and hard to follow. The voice drones on and on and on, and 20 minutes later you realize that you haven't heard anything that has been said for the past 18 minutes.
The Content is fantastic. This is a great story, and I will finish this with a print copy. I will give the print copy a glowing review. I'll talk about the authors ability to humanize neurology. And I will likely recommend this book to other science loving readers.
Ditch the audio version - get the book.
Avid audiobook listener. Mostly into memoirs / autobiographies and other non-fiction.
Sacks' unique patients are certainly interesting, but I often felt as if I have just opened up his clinical diary to a random page and was expected to understand technical terms and other context without a primer. Other reviewers have spoken about Sacks' compassion for his patients and that is clear, but as a reader I would like more framing, signposting, and analysis to link each case to a broader point or argument. This book has its moments, but overall it failed to reach its potential.