Atrociously written and badly read. I refuse to believe Tom Clancy was any where near this publication in anything apart from name. I did listen to the end only because I refused to believe it could not get worse - I was wrong.
Seems like the author didn't feel he had enough of one story for a full book, so he mashed three stories together. There's the flashback story of Moore's training as a Navy SEAL and the mission that went bad, the story of trying to take down one of the world's biggest drug lords, and the story of the terrorists. If he had left one out, the book would have been better.
I have read every novel Tom Clancy has published and recently listened to "Dead or Alive." I enjoyed them all, even the shared authoring of "Dead or Alive" with Grant Blackwood (Lou Diamond Phillips read was very credible). I don't think Clancy even read "Against All Enemies," much less participated in the writing of the book. The read was monotone yet tolerable, but the prose was just downright juvenile. Plus, all the characters in "Enemies" are new, so there wasn't even any nostalgia to fall back on. I managed to listen for thirty minutes, but that was it. I'm glad I bought it on sale - it's certainly not worth a credit!
I enjoyed the first chapter or two, but the story has got fuzzy and I'm not struggling with it. There is more enjoyable stories to listen to. Maybe the print version is better for this book. However, I do not feel like buying it.
I have listened to almost every Tom Clancy book he has written and enjoyed them all, that is until this one. The story was not written by Tom Clancy, it could not have been. It rambled, no plot to speak of, pathetic characters, ... The reader did the best he could. I wonder if Peter Telep wrote this book and Clancy put his name first. I won't be listening to another Clancy book anytime soon.
Health care educator
So real it is scary. The probability of this story becoming reality is chilling. It makes such sense. We have everything to be afraid of. There are so many enemies to the US, drug cartels, terrorist and God forbid they join forces in unexpected ways.
The suspense and eary resemblence to todays world.
The killing of the children and wives of the cartel lords. There was real love for their family but the money and power cost their families lives.
You cannot go wrong in reading a Tom Clancy book.
The book was full of the Tom Clancy distracting details of every little weapon, etc that keeps the reader from focusing on the story being told.
Non Fiction Reader
The book spends too much time on the hero's personal "crisis". Of course it has to do with a botched mission and a friend dies (been there, read that, not new). It intrudes in the story and it doesn't make the hero more human. Most of the plot is predictable and typical Clancy. The geewiz gadgetry, colapsed time and forced action. I prefer his earlier works. Jack Ryan was more believable and the stories more isdightfull. Reader sounds more like a lecturer, robotic and unemotional. Makes the parts that (I assume) are supposed to create sympathy sound more like reading a soap advertisement from a newspaper.
Yes, Clancy can be overly technical at times. Yes, the story isn't the most original of concepts.
However, like all Clancy novels I was amazed at all the seemingly self-contained story threads slowly culminating into an epic event. But Against All Enemies is slightly different in this aspect...there are actually two main events that take place,...two seprate but parallel stories taking place at the same time with the main protaginists and antgonists coincidentally cross paths.
Perhaps because I live near the US/Mexican border myself, the stories of the drug cartel side seemed both plausible and realistic so I could identify with many of the plot points. And then the other side of the coin, the Islamic jihadists that wish to re-create another September 11 like event....the descriptions are scary.
In this novel, Clancy moves away from all the high tech James Bondish gadgets of some of his past novels, and gets down in dirty with conventional weapons, car chases, and ruthless streetfights. I was also surprised by the body count in this book as well. Characters, both big and small on all three (yes, three) sides meet their maker and rosey endings aren't all that rosey for anybody.
I realize some criticize Clancy for his verbose and lengthy origins on some characters, but I am one who enjoys it. I really begin to understand that characters motivations and actions that much more.
Overall, I thought it was an entertaining book and action sequences were jaw dropping, although at times a tad predictable. Descriptions of border towns, especially in Mexico are dead on and a nice departure from Clancy's otherwise American or European tendenancies.
The narrator was just fine. I imagine it can be hard to voice dozens of chracters expecially with various accents. It wasn't stellar, but it wasn't bad either. A few times it was hard to figure out who was who, but rarely.
Like so much that Tom Clancy writes, it is entertaining, but it doesn't exactly qualify as an amazing piece of literature.
In Against All Enemies, various threads are woven together. Mexican drug cartels, Taliban terrorists and American government officials form a complex menagerie of infighting, conspiracy, and corruption that unfortunately abandons the realm of believability on more than one occasion.
Moving along at a solid pace through the novels entire length, I never felt the story dragging along, but once the terrorist plot was identified the conspiracy continued to develop even though the outcome became predictable.
If you are a Clancy fan this should be enjoyable, but it's not likely to be memorable upon it's conclusion.