Research. Presentation. Depth.
Books by Mark Lane, Rush to Judgement, Plausible Deniability or Last Word, for example.
The narrator spoke clearly, at an even pace, and did not mispronounce words, as often happens with Audible history narrators.
Learn once and for all the truth about the JFK murder.
This book handles deftly the wide range of evidence that the CIA construed and implemented the murder of JFK. Especially interesting are many of the eyewitness accounts to the original plan to murder him in Chicago on Nov. 2, the Oswald double, and the getaway flight of two of the perpetrators. Douglass presents clearly and fairly the stories of the many witnesses to the conspiracy.
He also goes into great depth on the why of the murder. In sum, it was because Kennedy was turning away from cold war posturing, and turning to peace initiatives that defied the entrenched authority of the CIA and their military allies. He went so far in pursuing peace, that he had to be killed. The specifics are well known: the bay of pigs debacle and hatred for Kennedy among those in the CIA who were involved; a possible rapprochement with Castro; Kennedy's convincingly presented desire and program to extract the US from Viet Nam; the comprehensive test ban treaty Kennedy supported between the US and USSR; and most especially his growing partnership with Khrushchev to move the world towards a non-war footing, after their sobering brinksmanship during the Cuban missile crisis. Douglass makes much of Kennedy's inspiring American University address of June 1963, which wrote sealed to his death warrant.
I do have a couple of minor criticisms, but I hope they do not discourage anyone from enjoying this thoroughly researched and important book. One is that Douglass, as a Catholic and peace advocate, tries to tie in too often the views and comments of Thomas Merton. They are relevant, but do not deserve the weight he gives them. Another is that Douglass presents baldly the evidence of all the eye witnesses to the activities of Oswald and his CIA double leading up to and on the day of the assassination, but never summarizes the whole rather confusing sets of evidence in a clear statement. Finally, it may be going too far to attribute of JFK the role of peace martyr. He is treated with perhaps a little more reverence than deserved, though Douglass never hesitates to point out a few of his personal shortcomings.
These minor matters only very slightly detract from the powerful presentation and in-depth research that makes this the best assassination book, from the evidential and historical perspectives, I have read.
I am coming very late to this information. As a Canadian who knew when JFK died, I did not really follow the intrigue over the next many years. This is an amazing history of conspiracy, intrigue, and deception....not the finest example of the USA leadership ...on the part of the CIA. I really appreciated learning about JFK's turn to peace with Russia and Cuba. If he had not been assassinated (by CIA plot) the world would be a different place As a Canadian, I am a strong supporter of my American friends and neighbours ....but it is time to be realistic and take ownership of the issues. The most recent is the incredibly stupid but powerful NRA lobby - get a grip Americans.
the story itself
Conspiracy in America
A great read
(To quote La Dolce Vita) Love, Love, and Love. That is a little silly or sentimental... probably both, but in truth it is a very loving and compassionate portrait that Douglass paints of a man who had, I think this is virtually certain today, turned towards a more peaceful solution to many domestic and global problems. Douglass, whether you agree with the turning concept or like Jim DiEugenio you believe JFK was never truly a cold warrior after his 1951 sojourn, aptly demonstrates key policy points of the short and often misunderstood Kennedy presidency, the reasons that these decisions were good for almost everyone EXCEPT the Military Industrial Congressional CIA Establishment Clusterfuck Conspiracy Complex, and just how these unprecedented moves led to his execution.
Uhmm... I am tempted to say Oswald because I am intensely fascinated with this oft misunderstood twenty-four year old. That said, in this particular case I don't think one can answer that question with anyone other than the target. Old Number 35 himself. Kennedy comes across as being a levelheaded, sophisticated, and inspired president. Undoubtedly the greatest one since FDR and possibly one of the handful of truly GREAT presidents.
I am not that wild about Mr. Larkin's performance. It is a trifle flat, though his voice is undoubtedly strong. I really, and I cannot stress this enough, much prefer when the book is read by the author. I have only owned four audiobooks in my life. Two of them are actually Vincent Bugliosi joints (I know, I know, but I knew that I would never, ever read the 2500 pages of reclaiming history so I thought I would listen to it on trips and whatnot, so I shoplifted it from a local bookstore one day when I was drunk. Ironically, I also bought Mr. Bugliosi's indictment of George W. Bush and the recent biography by British comic Jennifer Saunders of French and Saunders and Absolutely Fabulous fame. The only part of the W book I enjoy is actually the introduction read by Bugliosi himself. I cannot stress enough that I never, ever, in one million years with one million dollars would have bought the Saunders CD were it not read by Saunders herself. In my humble opinion, in both cases the author's reading of their own words adds color that is otherwise absent. In this respect I would much, much rather have heard Douglass read his own book, but Larkin is passable.
The part about the Chicago plot is one of the greatest available. It is shorter and more concise than the Abraham Bolden or Edwin Black treatments while still being mostly as informative. Also, the two Oswald stuff about the Texas Theater, redbird airfield, and the mysterious sighting of Oswald in a car with a license plate that belonged to close friends of J.D. Tippit are all compelling if I don't exactly believe all of them. (I would like to, but they simply seem too fantastic, despite the fact that Douglass has researched this as well as can possibly be done in this day and age when so many of the original players have shuffled off this mortal coil to quote Kevin Costner/Garrison) Whether every little thing about the two Oswalds is true or not, it is very interesting. Furthermore, you will not find the same depth of policy, historical context, and relevant assassination information in any other book. I agree, mostly that is, with CTKA's list of the ten best books on the assassination (though I have never read Kantor's book, and I don't think that Oswald and the CIA is better than Spy Saga... Blasphemy!). This book is, of course, one of those ten and nowhere else in that list will you find a book that does all of these things so well. Typically authors have to zero in more on a specific aspect of the case (Warren Commission, HSCA, medical evidence, Oswald, etc.) to be compelling. The only other book that really goes for everything and succeeds on this level is Rush to Judgement. Which, although a terrific read as Lane has an excellent literary voice and arguably the best "primer" book as it fleshes out the basic facts succinctly; it must be noted that a nearly fifty year old book simply isn't able to be considered in the same light as a book written in the wake of the ARRB revelations (which Douglass of course makes ample use of). With this in mind, sure it would be nice if everyone could read Battling Wall Street, JFK and Vietnam, Promises Kept, Oswald and the CIA, Breach of Trust, the Last Investigation, Rush to Judgment, Let Justice Be Done, etc. etc., the fact is that many people simply do not have that kind of time. As such, Douglass provides one of the best instances of bang for the buck in terms of time committed vis a vis information gleaned.
The rest of these are probably long enough. So, I'll just reiterate the fact that for an all in one look at domestic policy, foreign policy, assassination facts, declassified files, and historical context you could do a hell of a lot worse than JFK and the Unspeakable.
YEEESSSSSSS! Larkin reads it perfectly.
Layered complexity handled with unique deftness
His voice and pace.
Footnotes to a coup
It was well read
Author should have skipped Thomas Merton references. Other than that, a captivating, informational book!
I had high hopes for this book as an up-to-date aggregation of JFK assassination research to replace Jim Marrs' excellent (but dated) "Crossfire." Douglass' book is a huge disappointment, having more to do with the canonization of JFK as a Roman Catholic martyr than with the conspiracy itself.
Like Joe Friday, all I want are the facts. Douglass performs the specious task of imputing religious motivations to JFK's foreign policy, drawing parallels between that policy and the writings of Thomas Merton. Merton had about as much influence on JFK's foreign policy as Donald Duck.
I agree with the author that JFK was killed by the "military-industrial complex." The military-industrial complex is a Very Bad Thing that controls our government to this day ("Don't drone me, bro!"). However, the characterization of JFK as a saint strikes me as naive. To quote James Ellroy: "Jack Kennedy was the mythological front man for a particularly juicy slice of our history. He called a slick line and wore a world-class haircut. He was Bill Clinton minus pervasive media scrutiny and a few rolls of flab. Jack got whacked at the optimum moment to assure his sainthood."
The true story has been covered-up and the nation lied-to for 50 years. The full truth needs to be acknowledged by the government and the plotters exposed. This book, focused on Roman Catholic theology rather than the plot itself, does little to advance the cause. If you are an assassination conspiracy buff, better choices available on Audible include "LBJ: The Mastermind of the JFK Assassination" and "Legacy of Secrecy: The Long Shadow of the JFK Assassination."
Strange thing to me, is the author is very pro JFK. Yet he convinced me that if the CIA did kill him, they had to. He was indeed a threat to national security.
Reader beware. This is not a book dedicated to the JFK assassination ( which I mistakenky made ) This book could better be titled "What those bad boys in the Pentagon and CIA did to Camelot." I am a believer in the single gunman theory (Oswakd did it). I knew when I bought this book that this was a conspiracy slanted book. My giving only 3 stars to this review had nothing to do with ideological slant.
The biggest problem the listener has to endure is that the author does not believe in linear progression. One minute you're talking about the Berlin airlift, next minute Kennedy is dead, then back to castro and kennedy lives again. then its time to talk about Nikita K. for a bit then its back to Oswald.. This might be the editors fault
Another problem is that four of the biggest names in conspiricy circles hardly even gets a mention. Pope John XXIII has more discussion time then David Ferrie, Guy Bannister, Clay Shaw and Jim Garrison put together. Even if the author totally discounts these mens participation, a small discussion as to why would have been appropiate. I may have to go back and recheck but I dont even remember the name of Anthony Zapruda being mentioned. There was no anaylsis of the "magic bullet theory." The biggest iconic relic of conspiracy therorist isnt even mentioned, the pristine bullet found on JFKs stretcher.
Another problem for this book is that it moves at a glacial pace. Again, a better editor might have to be employed if there is a sequel.
If you believe that the CIA killed Kennedy, you will probably like this book. If you believe Oswald did it alone and you want more info, you will be disappointed. If you just wanted to learn about the assassination for the first time, try another book first.
I was in 5th grade when JFK was assassinated and have been fascinated ever since. I read all I can on the conspiracy theories, so I was excited to get this book. Although the information in the book could be quite fascinating, the narration is absolutely, punishingly, boring. I could not keep a focus on the story because the narrator's voice is so monotonous. I kept having to back up to re-listen to try to get information. It took me months to finish because of this. I wish I'd realized at the time that by being a member I could have exchanged the book. Good subject, well written, excruciatingly boring to listen to.
I think the story itself was well written
Just relief that I finally got through the book after months of trying.