The story will hook you and the narration is so perfectly suited it captures the reader completely. Very quickly into the reading, you will question what Faction YOU belong to.
Comparable to Hunger Games. Teenage girl against a corrupt government.
Emma Galvin is the perfect narrator for this book. Her voice is young, exactly what you expect for the heroine. Her emotions perfect - vulnerable, determined, brave, courageous, scared.
The story drew me in and kept me enthralled. Several chapters in, my son (13) walked in and got caught up in the story. I started it over and we listened together every evening after school and work. We both loved it, and waited anxiously for the second book to come out!
The characters we're believable and human, and well-described. The story line unfolded in a way that kept us waiting for more, and always wrapped up in the story. I love the dystopian city and the what-if feeling I got from it, as well as the what-happened?
Emma's voice annoyed me initially, and I continued listening in spite of her. However, as the story continued, she grew on me. Emma has a unique way of emphasizing words to make even the most boring sentence become interesting and full of life. I truly appreciate her nuanced reading now and will look for other books she narrates.
Absolutely! I had to force myself to sleep and anxiously waited for the next chance to listen!
I took a chance on this one, having never heard of the author or the book, and was ultimately rewarded with a fine performance and an engrossing book. I'm halfway through the third book in the series now, and can hardly wait for my next chance to listen!
Divergent is one of my Holiday pleasures and I enjoyed it! It allowed me to escape while I listened and I rank it as one of the better ones I listened to this year.
I do feel a similarity to the Hunger Games as it revolves around young people, is futuristic, and most the older people are evil or at least misinformed.
The reader was very interesting and had a clear concise voice that grabbed and kept my attention.
It was interesting enough to have listened to it in one sitting yet the length prevented that.
It was overall enjoyable for a fun and interesting Holiday read.
The narrator had little emotional range, relying on content alone for character development. Everybody spoke at the same pace and in the same limited set of attitudes. Sad.
Almost anybody. Alessandro Juliani does a better teenaged girls, with more complexity, at least, than Emma Galvin did. Sorry, Emma, but you have got to loosen up and dig a little deeper to get this reader to go near anything you narrate.
Come on, Audible. You know what good reading sounds like.
I have not read the print version, but the reading was well done, my only complaint was that her distinction between thoughts and spoken words (first person narrative) were a little unclear once in a while.
I'd say Divergent is similar to the Hunger Games series, similarly emotionally stunted/oblivious heroine with plenty of sexual tension (JUST DO IT ALREADY!) and a unique world-building universe
Having read a few YA books I can't say I was surprised when the story became predictable. There were moments when I was rooting for the main character. Although she was at odds with other characters, her survival skill were lacking. That just made her a putz. One or two times, ok, but all the time? Predictable.
On the whole the narrator was excellent. The story was climbed but never quite reached the top.
I had read very positive reviews before purchasing and therefore expected an engaging, exciting listen. I was quite disappointed.
The characters were one-dimensional, the story predicable, and the narration exaggerated. As I continued through the book, I had fruitlessly hoped that it would get better. I usually like there to be a bit of suspense, unraveling of plot, and opportunity for me to make connections and draw conclusions. There was no room for that in this book - everything was spelled out very, very neatly. It lacked creativity and really missed the mark for me.
My advice: if you generally enjoy Y/A books, I encourage you to try "The Bone Season". I may give Veronica Roth another chance, but I will not be trying another from her Divergent series.
Keeps you interested as it brings you along. No lagging sections
I listen to books in the car. The better the book the less I mind driving. I was troubled I had to stop when I reached my destination after 4 hours of driving.
No, story pulled me along out of curiosity of what would happen next so, I don't think I'd have the interest to listen to it again now that I know.
Fast paced and not always predictable.
They did make it a film.
Definitely for the young teenager, me being a little older I was a bit annoyed by the love connection it felt very high school to me.
Disclaimer: I can see that this book has a high review average. I don't want to insult anyone who enjoyed it, but as you might have guessed from the star count in my review I hold a *ahem* divergent opinion. I'm not trying to make waves and I certainly don't have such a self-important outlook as to think that my review will change anything. I just want to be honest about what I thought about the book.
In short, this is just, like, my opinion man.
The worst thing about Divergent, is that it has so much potential.
The idea of a society divided into five factions based on core ideals is neat. The factions themselves are fascinating (though I'm still not sure what Amity's real role in society is). Tris, a petite but determined sixteen year-old with the odds stacked against her, makes for a sympathetic main character. The "bad guy" is deliciously evil. Even the training, especially the simulations, is really interesting. Sure there's a little disconnect thanks to teen angst occasionally taking precedence over life or death situations, but I could easily ignore that to get to the good stuff.
So what's the problem? Consistency.
It's hard for me to explain without spoiling too much of the story, but Divergent is wildly inconsistent throughout. One minute Tris understands everything that is going on intuitively; the next she's completely clueless, or worse, she's forgotten the very things she discovered moments before or even things that were previously explained to her. Disabling wounds are conveniently shrugged off so as not to hinder critical plot points, then remembered later on so characters to collapse dramatically at a more convenient time. Paralyzing emotional losses are similarly forgotten and remembered at the story's convenience.
And then there's the dialogue. Sometimes it flows as the characters relate to one-another in a natural way. More often than not, however, conversations are awkward and full of exposition, which often explains things that were already made clear by context. It's as if the author doesn't trust her readers--or in this case, listeners--to draw the right conclusions, so she has to explain everything repeatedly to make sure we're on track. Even in supposedly tense moments where seconds wasted mean lives lost, characters will stop mid-action to have these exposition-filled dialogues that just so happen to explain (and then explain again, and then again) in remarkably clear language what is going on and what each character is or might be feeling.
But the single most frustrating thing about the book for me was the inconsistency in Tris's character. Unless divergence is secretly another word for schizophrenia, there is no reason that she should...
...refuse on principal to end the life of a truly evil enemy even to save herself, her boyfriend, and her family, but then, moments later, murder dozens of innocents in the name of self-preservation, especially when she could have gotten away safely without killing anyone by just running when she was told. [end spoilers]
Boiled down to a single word, "inconsistency" sounds like a minor problem, but its impact on the story is profound. Character's engage in forced conversations, make decisions based on unclear or simply nonsensical personal motivations, are one minute confined by a principal or barrier and the next ignore it, shrug off near-fatal injuries only take them up again for dramatic effect later on; all this seemingly for the sake of hitting bullet points on the author's outline. It's maddening, and it ruined the book for me. The ending as a whole is an especially awful slapdash affair. It just falls apart if you think about it. It's a mess.
Another reviewer noted that "this is not the Hunger Games," and they are right. I have plenty of problems with Suzanne Collins' trilogy (pretty much all of them with the third book), but it's a class above the inconsistent mess that is Divergent. I listen to and enjoy fiction in a variety of genres and targeted at all ages, everything from Harry Potter to Moby Dick (thanks Audible! I never would have made it through that one on my own) but I did not enjoy Divergent. I don't recommend it, and I won't be checking out the sequels.
But, like I said, that's just my opinion.
The genre? No, or at least not completely. I kind of want to check out the Mortal Instruments books, though Divergence has made me a little leery.
The series? Absolutely.
The narration is a little lifeless, but given the material Galvin's given to work with, I can't really fault her. She seems competent enough, so I won't judge E.G. based on this one.
An extra edit could have helped this book immensely. Repetition could have been eliminated, exposition-heavy dialogue slimmed down, and characters' inconsistencies ironed out.
If I have to choose a scene though, I would just chop off the ending. The book, for all its flaws, was really interesting up to the last few chapters. Leaving the enemy and their plot as a menacing unknown would have been preferable to watching all that potential get pissed away at the end.
I literally just finished listening to the book, if that changes anything. Don't think it will.