I have bought all Bart Ehrman's books that I know of. And continue to re read them (well listen anyway - plus one on kindle) As a former Jehovah's Witness (fulltime pioneer) I also had a 'no fault' belief in the scriptures and if there was a question raised it was my fault or the Watchtower society hadn't given me the answer yet! Barts methodological process of highlighting biblical errors and why they are there have been helpful. He hits items I also found (that star over a building to identify where Jesus was - can you identify a specific country a star hovers over never mind a town or building). Context and historical background is essential and justified. There has been scholarly justification for some errors and forgeries but these excuses are rejected and clear arguments for that decision given. Bart's academy and erudition gives all you want if you haven't had the formal training. All his arguments he justifies and yet its at a lay level but adds to your personal knowledge and can test at the edge of your own education making it an interesting, challenging but educative read. Very well recommended.
I think that many if not most Christians understand and accept the fact that much of the New Testament was not written by the people who were assumed to be the authors, especially in the case of the Gospels. This fact has been pretty well established by others. Though I found Ehrman's premise to be interesting in many cases, the book did become repetitive and somewhat boring. The fault of this book lies in the fact that he throws out the baby with the bathwater; the wisdom contained in many of the biblical writings, even the "forged" ones is not recognized. He and others can establish that much of the writing accepted at scripture is not attributed to the correct author, but the reason for this can only be guessed at and it remains conjecture.
I heard a more complete story of the opposing position to Biblical realizability and authority in this work, and I'm grateful to have understood it. I can see where those who side with the author are coming from. Though, I believe there are other positions and defenses not shared that would be a good argument against this which I find to be true. The Bible is a trustworthy source of who Jesus was and the way to salvation.
I would not recommend this to anyone since this is repetitive information of the first book title Misquoting Jesus and Jesus interrupted.
I would not have written another story if I know the same information is repeated in different ways.
Forged is already follow up of the last two previous title "Misquoting Jesus" and "jesus Interrupted". No follow up is needed on this book anymore
Between the 3 titles "Misquoting Jesus", "Jesus Interrupted" and "Forged in the name of God" the best one is "Jesus Interrupted" is the best one, buy this one to avoid paying extra for the same information on the other title.
It was one of the most informative factually.
The large number of distortions in the New Testament, about which they never told you in Sunday School.
All were interesting and I especially liked the new picture of Paul, not as a male chauvinist, but as a real man who valued women as essentially equal to men.
I have long questioned much of what was written in the New Testament. I believe Jesus was one of the greatest people who ever lived; however, I have felt his life was misrepresented by many of the writings of the New Testament. This book confirms much of what I, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, and other founding fathers believed of the New Testament.
Any document written over one hundred years after events must be filled with what the writers thought, not what actually occurred,
I reserve five stars for books I would listen to again. I started this book and realized I had already read it, but I enjoyed it again. (Note to self: look on bookshelf before ordering from Audible.) So five stars.
I appreciate Bart Ehrman's books for the way they challenge my beliefs and stir things up when I'm getting lazy.
Say something about yourself!
The author cannot decide whether he is writing for academics for the the average reader. It got so dull that I almost fell asleep driving on the highway. I had to quit listening for my own safety.
I have read many of Prof. Ehrman's other books, and I have enjoyed all of them. While I still enjoyed this book and received some gain from it, I felt like something was different. For whatever reason, this book felt as though it had a more skewed ratio of personal, rather than scholary, commentary.