I loved this book. The author analyzes the books in the New Testament and comes to some very interesting conclusions. Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are not the authors of those books. But who was--and when were they written? The author also makes a case for calling the content of some of the books "forgeries." That may not work for some people, but I think his reasoning is sound.
I had to get used to the reader. He does a good job, but he's not a favorite. Anyone wanting a different take on the conventional wisdom of the New Testament will enjoy this book.
This is a book that needs an open-minded reading (or hearing) from every Christian who claims that those who disagree with their views have simply failed to open their heart and mind to the Holy Spirit.
Although certain of books of the Bible claim to report divine revelations, the Bible makes no overall claim of its own inerrancy. Most people agree that the Bible was written by many authors at many different times. Decisions about which writings qualify as scripture was made long after the lifetimes of the authors. This is true of the Old Testament as well as the New; though this book focuses on the later.
Bart Erhman presents a clear and compelling case for the proposition that traditional understanding of who wrote the books of the New Testament is incorrect and that many of them include false authorship claims (which makes them forgeries). Use of this highly pejorative (though entirely accurate) descriptor serves to pull the reader out of the complacency with which the uncertain authorship of the text is often approached. Acknowledging that we do not have original texts of any of these writings, Ehrman points to the oldest of the surviving copies to conclude that they were well educated in Greek, not the Aramaic-speaking disciples with first-hand knowledge of Jesus that they claimed to be. Additionally, they address theological issues that arose decades, if not centuries, after the death of their purported authors.
Ehrman does not limit his analysis to those books included in the New Testament canon; he also reviews writings that were rejected expressly because they were thought to be forgeries. His conclusion is unavoidable: applying the same standards of veracity to biblical texts as we would to any other work, we cannot accept the teachings of much (but not all) of the New Testament.
Highly recommended. Expertly read, this book is a real eye opener. If you are at all interested in the truth behind Christianity's turbulent origins this one is for you.
Overbearing and no nuance at all. Experienced the same with his narration of The Ravenous Brain. I will definitely check future buys and forego them if Dixon is reading.
Far too tedious to get past the first part.
The content in this book is very reliable so I certainly would recommend it to anybody. Bart Ehrman is a very intelligent person what studied the content of all the books we have available and is very clear to how he comes to his conclusions. I do disagree with him on one item and that is the existence of Jesus. He believes in him and I don't.
The facts and information in this book was interesting and in many ways fascinating. It was not always completely clear where the book was heading, until I reached the very end.
Then I understood: "And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John, 8:32.
When reading the script about Philemon, the reader said chapter 24. When in fact, it shoud have been verse 24, as Philemon only has one chapter.
Very informative and confirming my gut feeling about religion as a whole. Mr. Ehrman's last comments about lying are very well put.
All are well portraied. The diction is excellent.
Please have Harper Audio redo the sement about Philemon. Otherwise the book is perfect.
"Forged", like Ehmrans other books, is well researched and written in a style that is easy to follow. Easily a worthwhile listen. Most of the material was also included in his other books "Misquoting Jesus" and "Jesus, Interrupted." I was also surprised that much of the book is about forgeries that are NOT in the Bible. Books that have been found. This was very interesting but I was expecting more time spent on the forgeries he believes made it into the Bible and more time spent on why scholars believe that a given writing is a forgery, and then, for intellectual honesty, also points made by those who do not believe that the text is forged.
Overall, a good book, certainly not a waste of time, but not as good as I had hoped.
It was interesting for awhile, but... I didn't finish the book. About 1/2 way through I found it repetitious.
Yes, I thought the narration was nicely done. The volumn was constant, and that's a big issue for me. Watler Dixon speaks clearly, passionately, and easily understood.
I think that many if not most Christians understand and accept the fact that much of the New Testament was not written by the people who were assumed to be the authors, especially in the case of the Gospels. This fact has been pretty well established by others. Though I found Ehrman's premise to be interesting in many cases, the book did become repetitive and somewhat boring. The fault of this book lies in the fact that he throws out the baby with the bathwater; the wisdom contained in many of the biblical writings, even the "forged" ones is not recognized. He and others can establish that much of the writing accepted at scripture is not attributed to the correct author, but the reason for this can only be guessed at and it remains conjecture.