Contains much historical information that I had not previously heard. It describes in depth many historical, social, economic and personal factors influencing the reasons for and early progress of the civil war.
Audible obsessed lifelong learner.
Goodheart gives great insight into the events leading up to the Civil War. One would think this has been well covered by other books, but Goodheart tells the events from the perspective of everyday citizens and the thoughts and fears of the time. The Wide Awake movement was very interesting. This is a very good addendum to anyone who likes to read about the Civil War and wants to dig beneath the stories of Lincoln, Lee, Sherman and the other leaders trust into the center stage of history.
Sometimes it felt like "Groundhog Day" the movie -- going back over and over the same time. Fascinating to get such a complete national view of the run up to the war. Great accessible history. I would recommend it highly for anyone who simply wants to learn more about America. Staunch defenders of the South -- watch out -- the author does not allow revisionist history pretending that it wasn't about slavery. Staunch Northerners watch out too...not everyone in the North was a far-sighted abolitionist. A great read.
A good book if you are interested in the B characters in the pro-Union camp. The author writes very little about southerners and very little about happenings in the south. Bull Run gets about a page and a half but Elmer Ellsworth gets page after page. If you are looking for the vast scope of happenings in 1861 I would suggest you look elsewhere.
I was glad the book was over. It was interesting but narrow in scope.
I don't write book reports.
You really have to be a history major, which I am not, to enjoy this book because there is too much inside baseball, where you get overwhelmed with information behind the glass window.
At first, I wasn't too sure in what I was getting into because it start off with personal commentary from the author, which I don't like, but if you get through the first 30 minutes, the book goes in depth on why we had a Civil War,, like slavery, religion, political events and etc.
This is not your ordinary book on war, but very detail facts on what happen to lead us to the Civil War.
Toward the end, the book became harder to process because it just goes on and on without an end.
This title should had been broken up in different volumes in a series because it just got too overwhelming to remain focus on the subject.
The author's premise seems to be that the events of 1860 and early 1861, especially the firing on Fort Sumpter, changed the northern US population from an attitude of "co-existence" with slavery to a war fever and follows that conversion through the stories of assorted individuals. While some are well known to history (for example Major Robert Anderson and James Garfield) most are unknown or little known today.
While I personally find the premise unconvincing (slavery had already radicalized much of the North by the time of the Dredd Scott decision) the stories of the individuals are themselves interesting. I have to admit that although I have read a lot about the lead-up to the Civil War and the war itself much of this information was new to me.
I have only given this book 4 stars (I would have given it 3 1/2 if I could) because I do not feel that the stories, although interesting, contributed to my knowledge of this period. There is one exception and that is the stories of the "contraband" in Virginia. I knew nothing of this event and it does much to explain the attitude of the southern slaves.
The narration is adequate but uninspired. I have heard much worse, but also much better.
No. I gave up about half way through, so don't take this review as representing the latter half. As it is, the writing is extremely dry and boring... and fantastically skewed in its interpretations.
Has he written anything else?
Yes, both were dry and boring.
I generally enjoy books such as these but had to stop listening 1/4 of the way through. It was just dry... informative, but dry.
This one almost put me to sleep. Blah, blah, blah. 1861, and the years leading up to the war and all the rhetoric is (to me), boring at best.
While the overall concept of the book is very interesting, the trivia became tedious at times.