I bought this book based on the rave reviews of Dr. Dawkins original book. Unfortunately, the frequent asides referring to his first book and the many references to journal articles he has written make the new book tedious. Rather than rewrite his book and update the material, the author takes the original book and adds various paragraphs explaining how his findings have either been upheld or misunderstood. The book is unnecessarily long and repetitive. Can I get my money back?
The book is great, perhaps a scientific classic now, but the author reads every single footnote, which makes the listening slow and unbearably boring.
The footnotes are optional or to be read later if you want. This author doesn't want you to miss any of his boring notes. This in my opinion is a serious lack of respect to the listener.
not any more
Disappointment - in that he tried to update the original book, which was quite good, with too many inserts that caused you to lose his train of thought. Too many voice changes
I'll never reply to that come on from Audible again unless to re read a classic that
hasn't been compromised by revisions & subject like Shopping that could only be read for historical information. No one shops that way any more. Ask Amazon!
The author should not imply that his beliefs are the only logical explanation for life.
I have no complain on their performance
I've never given a bad review to a book, but this one deserved it. I could not keep on listening to this audio book past chapter 3.
The trunk of the author's argument about gene selection is as godless and "anti-agency of man" as anything I've ever read. It's persuasive, fascinating, shocking, educational and hopeless all at the same time. He doesn't present his ideas as theory, he promotes them as doctrine. On its face, it helped me understand gene selection. More broadly it also lends perspective to whole segments of liberal academia and society--especially those who despise religion (like the author). Other reviews have mentioned how it rocked their faith. For me it made me appreciate mine more.
As interesting as the content is, the recorded performance is almost unlistenable. They chose a narrator with an erudite British accent. It's pretty much straight out of the BBC and infers a sense of academic superiority. When it is combined with the author’s pretentious way of expressing himself, it's almost unlistenable. In this 30th anniversary edition, the author himself reads his own footnotes, which interrupt the main narrator's flow. It's like watching a movie you've never seen and it has the soundtrack for the directors commentary turned on. Just about the time you are following the idea in the chapter he chimes in with a footnote that more often than not amounts to him taking a victory lap for how great his book has been after 30 years--that and he spends a lot of time tisk tisking his academic rivals (who the lay person has never heard of). The author is obviously brilliant but if he were at a party you wouldn't be able to stand being around him.
Science, philosophy, theology, cats.
Though a tad light on the hard science, Dawkins' exemplary intelligence and passion make this a compelling read. Accessible to laymen and interesting enough to keep the attention of those who may not find biological textbooks to be utterly captivating beach reading material.
I have read and absolutely loved other books by Dawkins (The God Delusion and The Magic of Reality) but found this one much more scientific and hard to follow - and, well, not nearly as compelling. For my not-so-scientific mind, I would have preferred less detail. Perhaps a printed copy would be easier to get through - audiobooks make it difficult to skim through parts you're less interested in, and this one is quite long.
However, Dawkins and Ward are excellent narrators and pleasant to listen to.
the meme, because it makes me want to find other books on that, it was something i was aware of since i was a meaning-seeking teenager. but i'd also like more good books this easy to understand and as entertaining but even deeper on evolution itself. so sad evolution is under attack now--it was not so when I was in high school 50 years ago!
yes well the god delusion was good too but this is the foundation book, i think. i looked at their other books on evolution but they seemed repetitive--i could be wrong, but i'd like to try other authors as honest and clear as dawkins
no, and i intend to listen to it more than once
This book has a lot of incredible ideas presented with candor and grace. Much of the content is intensely logical so the reader should take frequent breaks to take in each step. The reading is kept fresh by alternating male and female readers. I do love this author though I dont always agree with him on general conclusions. Concpet of meme (sp?) is great to take from this book also.
Got through it and learned some valuable knowledge about the gene pool, not really my cup of tea.