Easily among the best!
This book made me revisit the philosophical question,
I loved the mix of science and anecdote in this book. As a software engineer with an interest in all areas of science, I found the meditations on what it means to be human and whether machines could ever qualify for the title fascinating. I think the book would appeal to a broad range of people. It is written in a really accessible fashion. The narration is also excellent.
I really liked the story behind the title for the book
This book builds some great insights into both humanity and and computer science. i would defiantly recommend it to anyone with technical interests
I dont think i have read much that goes along these lines, but it looks like there is plenty out there
animated and articulate but at times a little unclear
i think this book says quite a lot for its length compared with many other books, defiantly worthwhile...
Although I thought this book would go into more depth about AI, the philosophical questions about what it means to be human and conscious that Brian Christian brings up were quite interesting and thought-provoking. I started to get a little lost in the final chapters, but overall, this was an enjoyable listen.
Business owner , philanthropist.
My only snag with it is it pretty much contains the same information that a whole lot of other books written my journalist write. If your looking for this kind of concepts read something by malcolm Gladwell. If you like a good story and and have already gone through the other journalists this is worth the listen.
This book is claimed to be "an examination of the way machines are forcing us to appreciate what it means to be human, and Brian Christian examines the philosophical, biological, and moral issues raised by the Turing Test." Well, in my opinion, not really, on both accounts. Although personal remembrances on having taken the Turing Test and other anecdotes is worth a read, Christian's sophomoric attempt at examining the philosophical and moral issues of AI and on the question of whether AI can ever be sentient, let alone human-like, goes no where intellectually, and one is left with the untenable opinion, by default, that the answer to that question is positive -- just not yet. The main philosophic/cognitive-scientific point on language for humans is that a word represents a concept, not just a way to communicate, whereas to a machine, a word cannot represent a concept -- that a machine can communicate but cannot form a concept, and yet the mythology of the coming of the sentient AI remains solid for the faithful. Brian Christian's book is like a "fair and balanced" story on Roman Catholicism from a priest where the Church is Computer Science and the priest is a computer geek.