This is the most descriptive narrative that I have ever read/listened to! The way that the author described the feeling and situations that Lena gets into....it's almost breathtaking! I can see it without trying. I can't imagine reading this book either without hearing Sarah Drew's voice and the way that she reads this book; she makes everything that Lauren Oliver describes come to life! It is amazing and I give both the author and the narrative props for the way that they present this book...I couldn't have imagined it any better. Thank you! I am actively looking for other books that Lauren Oliver has written and other books that Sarah Drew as narrated. Either way, I will be happy!!!
I only have two vices in life, wine and my audible books. I will cut you if you try to take either one from me!
Probably not. It is an entertaining book, but it took the 2nd download for the story to take hold. The reader's voice sounds a little too young for me in the beginning, but I guess that is to be expected when surfing the young adult titles.
By the time I got close to the ending, I was hooked, and knew I'd be buying the series.
Alix. A more mature character.
The end! I got chocked up at how many times Alix he demonstrated unconditional love
This book was interesting. It took me a minute to get into it mostly because I couldn't fathom a world where love was outlawed. I had a hard time wrapping my brain around it, and I was annoyed with the characters and the way they defended their way of living and thinking. But I kept on listening and it gets really good. I enjoyed how the characters fell in love, and how this love affected the path they were on in such a life altering way. It was kind of annoying honestly though listening to Sarah Drew because her character drives me crazy on Grey's Anatomy. It's hard to picture anything but Sarah's face in my mind when she was talking instead of trying to imagine her as Lena. Sarah did a good job on the narration, it was just the fact that I associate her voice with someone else that bothered me.
yes it was an interesting concept. I like the development of the characters
yes ver different story I liked it
Yes would be good
I don't have time to sit and read, but I have plenty of time to sit and listen! :)
This was my first listen with Lauren Oliver and the book is great but the narration is outstandingly done. You get a very close actual feel for the characters, for their pain and longing. Excellent job Sarah Drew!
I loved how this book reminded me of what it's like to be a young adult. Growing up believing that the system put in place is to protect you, for your own good. Then as pedals from a rose are picked away you begin to grow and see that not everyone is telling you the truth. Not everyone cares about your protection, they only care about the power they have over you.
This book is that type of dystopian world where of all things, Love is a disease and you have to be cured of it. If you are not, you are a sick and diseased person who can't be relied to make good choices, those choices are taken from you when you are cured. If you are cured you are a good citizen and allowed to be part of the world that is functional.
But not everyone is cured. Not everyone wants it.
What I appreciate about this book most is the comparison to old literature. How society has re-written old stories so that people will not want to love and they are scared into obeying. The bible is even rewritten as the book of "Shhhhhh". So it keeps you on your toes trying to remember the same stories you grew up with and how they differ in this book.
Delirium is well worth the credit.
drawing on the walls
I would definitely recommend this book! I really enjoyed the entire series. The story was original and interesting. It will keep you on your toes.
The plot was silly, the character unlikeable.
I think the performance was fine...it was the material that was hard to take.
Sorry....didn't devote that kind of attention to this book.
I liked the concept of the story line. The idea of Love being a disease was not one that has been overdone. And thank heaven there wasn't a triangle love story. I thought the characters could have been given more depth. I realize that it is from the mind of the main character but the other characters needed to be explored more. And the book of SSHHH, was just plain..... stupid.
This was my first introduction to this author.
I wanted to like her. I think she had a range that would have worked if there had been more emotion to characters like Alex, he felt one dementional and the Sister's voice about made me crawl out of my skin, although I realize that was part of the story line.
The author has an almost poetic and very descriptive way that she writes. Sometimes it made the story become tiresome to listen to. Others that have reviewed the book loved this, sometimes I just felt "Get to the point already!" I liked the Divergent and Hunger games series much more. But that being said, I did purchase book 2, I am into it enough to want to find out where the story line takes the Characters.
Can you imagine a world where "Love" is considered a disease? This is the world that Lana lives in. She is days away from being cured when her world is turned upside down and finds out everything she has been brought up to believe in is not what it seems. She begins to question if love is really a bad thing after all. Oliver took me on a roller coaster ride of emotions as Lana comes into her own self discovery of love and life. The ending had me crying like a baby and running to read the next book. Sarah Drew did an excellent job with the narration and kept me pulled into the story. Wonderful!
Until the last few chapters of Delirium, I was sure I wouldn't return for the second in the trilogy. Now I am in a quandary. The cliffhanger at the end of book one does make me want to check out the next book. The writing is good, even poetic at times. But something is holding me back.
I think it is because, just like in a similar book (Matched), the society and culture in Delirium are intriguing but the main character is annoying and shallow. In fact, the two books are too similar. Both are set in cultures that control personal relationships, both have "wild" areas outside the city where nonconformists live and do battle, both focus on a young female who are more obsessed with boys than with the lies they uncover about their society.
Lena, almost 18 and waiting for the cure that will remove the delirium from her system, is so obsessed with wanting to kiss Alex again that she has no emotional reaction to seeing a group of her peers beaten and, in one case, seeing a young man have his throat torn open by a dog. Her whining about her inadequacies, her looks, and her relationship grew tedious. Where was her repulsion for what she had witnessed? I wanted a strong female character, who matured with her experiences, not a overwrought teenager.
I was also put off by the swift change from serious happening to flippancy. Part of this could be due to the narrator's interpretation of the text. But in the scene in the backroom of the grocery store Lena and Hannah go from tears about the violence they witnessed to snappy comebacks about Alex in the blink of an eye.
The story is told from Lena's first person present point of view and it suffers from it. The reader is isolated in Lena's head and she is so preoccupied with Alex and the cure we don't learn enough about what goes on around her. Why, for instance, are there so few cars? Do the various gated cities communicate with each other? How does the United States function as a country? What set off the government policy requiring the removal of emotions, love in particular it seems, from the human condition? Reading reviews of the second and third books in the series, it is clear the author couldn't sustain the series in Lena's first person present point of view. In the second volume, she alternates present and future time to deal with the limitations. And Hannah becomes a viewpoint character in the third volume.
The narrator does an excellent job of differentiating the characters but I grew tired of the whiny internal monologues. Again, part of that is the text.