Wasn't familiar with all of Gulliver's destinations, remembered the small and giant people but had forgotten the rest. All were very interesting. David Pierce did an excellent job reading it and bringing it to life.
Reader does a great job. It's one of those classics you hear about all of the time and I figured I should read it, and now I have given it a solid try.
I thoroughly enjoyed the artful use of language to express, with color and flare, the story's comments on the social morays and prejudices of Jonathan Swift's time (1667 - 1745). I especially enjoyed David Hyde Pierce's narration. It made this satirists' humorous and poignant social comments a classic a page turner. What a ride! I would dearly love to hear David Hyde Pierce read from any of Mark Twain and/or Will Rogers works.
David Hyde Pierce does a terrific job bringing the opinions of the narrator to life. His performance was great.
I just didn't enjoy the story much, so it was a chore to finish the book. Thank goodness for the narration of David Hyde Pierce, which brought some fun to the listening.
I didn't finish listening because the material is too antique. Unlike Shakespeare whose language and style is seemingly timeless--I think 500+ years classifies as timeless--Swift's is not. Even David Hyde Pierce's estimable narration couldn't make up for the heavy-handedness of the satire. Today's listeners are at once more sophisticated and more cynical than Swift's and don't need the bluntness of Swift's satire beating them over the head to get his points..
Making the satire less heavy-handed would shorten the book and update the language.
I haven't read the book but I imagine it would certainly be as good.
I did listen to this in one sitting!
This book was much funnier than I thought it would be! David Hyde Pierce was very good. This was definitely worth the download and listen.
Swift must have been on his generation's version of LSD when he wrote Gulliver's Travels.I purchased this to listen to in the car while driving my 86 yr. old mother to her home across several states this fall. It was highly inappropriate in most story lines. I stopped it after the second "travel". My wife and I tried to listen to it while we took a driving vacation later. We could not get through the whole thing. I will be asking for my money (credit) back on this one.
Everything after the title.
David Hyde Pierce did a good job. It was the story that stunk.
Pierce takes on the role of Gulliver with real understanding. The narrator of this work–Gulliver himself—is at times a trustworthy reporter, at times a partisan advocate, and at time an absolute fool. Of course, he does not realize when he is a bigot or an idiot, and Pierce reads him so that he comes across as utterly sincere while Swift looms behind him saying—"See how people fool themselves!" Pierce makes it easy to keep in mind the presence of both Gulliver and Swift at such moments.
The voice of Gulliver, who so often misses what's going on.
I thought Pierce capture than deluded, arrogant, horse-worshipping Gulliver at the end of the book perfectly.
I think 18th-century novels with their ironic narrators are perfect for Pierce. Could he do Fielding's Jonathan Wild the Great? Or, a Thackeray's Barry Lyndon, a Victorian version of the 18th-century? He would make those neglected novels come alive.