Enjoying life, sharing joy, and shaping compassion in each moment.
Branagh does an award-winning job with this gripping story. His timing and inflection lift the words from the page and first you're there listening to a friend tell a story, then you're deep into the experience described. Conrad's writing is spare without being barren; it is evocative and spell-binding.
An excellent combination of story and reader.
Because my education was fragmented and left me with gaping holes, I'd never read "Heart of Darkness" and having chosen this route into excavating into the ruins of my deficit I am more than well pleased, I'm actually grateful.
Reading a book on your own depends on your ability to enter into the world the writer has created; to suspend disbelief requires talent and skill on the part of the writer *and* the reader. This is why movies flourish while the books, the written stories that "inspire" the movie languish unread in libraries and bookstores. I am, generally, a willing and eager reader, attributes that make reading my primary entertainment. Listening to audiobooks was an experiment I undertook when I found that my physical limitations reduced my ability to carry books, concentrate on stories, and immerse myself in the world created for me.
Kenneth Branagh is a talented reader and Joseph Conrad is a talented writer, together they carried me into the Heart of Darkness. I hope they can do the same for you.
Altought horrible the story is grippig as it raises and ponders over some of eternal philosophical questions. I don't want to make any comments. It's surely worth reading and I advise everybody to do so.
Narration is performed by legendary Kenneth Branagh and he has done a good job.
What else can be said...
Great introduction book
No I haven't but I enjoyed this one.
Yes, but I listened to it in two sittings.
This is the first audio book I've ever listened to. The book was recommended to me by my dad (he read the story). He thought it would be a good way to start because it is a good book and not really long compared to other audio books.
I would definitely listen to Heart of Dearkness over again! Branagh embodies the looming darkness that overshadows the novel as a whole and keeps a listener absorbed throughout its entirety. Wonderful find!
No, Both were very good. It was nice to read along as the story was read, or just sit back and listen.
I haven't finished book yet
The way he made you feel the characters he was reading
nothing extreme, it did make me chuckles a few times
Some books lend themselves to audio performances more than others, the difference being whether the writing is so dense that, if one were reading it, one would have to pause and go back over certain passages. Heart of Darkness lies close to the edge of what one can absorb in a single listening, because it demands quite a lot of thought and consideration, yet while one is considering the narrative is moving on. On the other hand, the fact that it is mostly supposed to be narrated by Marlow in a moored ship at night makes the audio version in many ways eerily appropriate. I'd read the novel many years ago, without, I think now, fully understanding it then. I've listened to this version twice now, both times with great enjoyment and profit, although the second listening was really necessary.
One of the things that Branagh does best is convey the moments in which the narrator, Marlow, finds his mind racing with excitement, so that even where his narrative loses some rational clarity (not Branagh's voice, which is always perfectly lucid), it gains in a sense of emotional urgency.
Good performance. Well-written story. I guess it just wasn't my style of book. Or perhaps it would've been better if I had listened to all three in order.
Kenneth Branagh truly takes us into the "Heart of Darkness" in a splendid reading. We feel the power of Conrad's prose, and the graphic descriptions enable us to sense the climate, the heat, and the darkness.
One cannot escape the inevitable questions with which we are left at the end of this tale. As much as I revere the work as a literary classic, I have long felt there was something "missing" -- or, perhaps more accurately, that I had "missed" something. I suspect that what I should really have liked (impractical as it may be) were Branagh's own insights into the character of Marlowe and the tale he told. Then again, perhaps I should also have appreciated Conrad's, too.
These subjective musings should in no way reflect negatively upon the production. The work is a classic, and this presentation is superb.
Yes. For all you fans of Apocalypse Now, this is going to sound very familiar.
I have listened to it several times. Branagh seems to "get" this story, and brings it to life perfectly. Also, he does not allow Coppola's film "Apocalypse Now" to influence or overshadow this original.
In this performance the original text as written by Conrad has been "updated" to a small extent; that is to say, "politically correctified" to a certain degree.
Is this not clear? Then let me be blunt: they have replaced Conrad's unabashed use of "the N-word" with "native" and "negro" and such-like.
I would have much preferred that they not do this. They should have had the courage to let literature and history speak in its own voice. Nonetheless, the story survives this minor tampering.