Ken Follett consistently tells a great story, but he doesn't write well. It seems to me that he must be paid by the page because there is always more information necessary to effectively tell the story. To palate this book on audio, you have to become deaf to the overuse of "however", "nevertheless", and "suddenly". If you have the hardcopy, this misuse of words can be skipped over, as well as the gratuitous sex and descriptions that do NOT enhance the story line. Otherwise, a good book.
Any historical fiction that prompts the reader to take a deeper look at the history of the period depicted earns, my respect. This is exactly what Fall of Giants did for me. I wanted to read more of what the historians have to say about the time period. Only reason I didn't give this novel 5 stars is because of the many characters and intertwined plot which make it hard, at times to follow. But well worth persevering!
This is Follett at his Best! Again!. I have about 3 hours to finish listening to this great history lesson. I have learned a lot about history from great authors like Fottett. I couldn't remember how WWI came about. But looking at it through the eyes of characters of that time clarifies it for me. What I find most interesting is Russia, Lenin and how the revolution happened. And the characters are great, 'Good' ones and 'Bad' ones. I hate for it to come to an end. I can't wait for Part 2 to come out. I recommend this to everyone, whether they like to read or listen. I makes my commute something to look forward to instead of dread.
Everybody who's read a lot of Ken Follett understand a couple key points: 1) he's hot and cold - writing some incredible novels and some terrible dogs, and 2) he likes to put a random sex scene in to keep things spicy.
I really wanted to like this book and by listening to it, I was able to finish it. If I had been reading it, I would have quit long before I got half way in. The individuals' stories don't connect much and are not that interesting. The history lesson is good. Hearing about how the Red Army comes to power in Russia is interesting. Hearing the phrase, "and when he entered her" several times in a 1,000 page historical fiction was a little creepy.
Articulate, sonorous and dull dull dull. Did I say dull? No sparkle, charm or life. Has the taste of a sandwich left in the fridge for 2 days, meaty and substantial but lifeless and dry. It is as if an outline of the period's news events was created and characters stuffed in; or Follet took an 8th grade history book and introduced minor plot lines into it with a sprinkling of harlequin sex. I'm a history lover, WWI/II buff and often bury myself in turn of the century period piece novels, but the minutia here is relentless and mind-numbing. If you're looking for a meaty read with passion and life pick up any Michner...or if you're up to it War & Peace; or go Pulitzer Prize with Herman Wouk and The Winds of War; or better yet skip all the detail and go modern with passion, love and war by wrapping your ears around Ian McEwan's Atonement. Like Russia? Save yourself 20 hours of pain and banging your head against the wall from listening to Fall of Giants; settle in, and watch the sumptuous feast of Warren Beatty in the film "Reds". John Lee is fine as narrator as always, but if this is truly the first of 3 novels I am stopping here.
This is a multi character sweeping story that spans World War I from Russia to the United States. Not only is it attention holding but very informative about that period of time. I recomment it highly.
Ken Follett is a great story teller. It is a shame that he doesn’t have enough confidence in his own writing to avoid sections of graphic pornography. It’s also a shame that this book may be remembered for who is not allowed to read it or who is offended by it vice the story it tells.
I loved this book, I'm seeing a lot of comments about how much people loved Pillars of the Earth and World without end, but this book isnt what they expected. Ok, Pillars and its sequal were exceptional, no question, but if you want to understand the writing in this book, then go back to 'Triple', 'Lie down with Lions', and especially 'The man from St.Petersburg', 'The Eye of the Needle', The Key to Rebecca' and Night over water'. This is a work of fictionalized history, and once again its a masterpiece of its genre, Follett is the King of "Epic history" and he isnt deposed by this work.
I was very excited to listen to this book having quite enjoyed Ken Follet's other books. Unfortunately, this book read like a cheap harlequin novel with just enough history intermixed to make it bearable. The characters were totally uninspiring and I found myself not caring at all what happened to them. I could not finish this book.
According fictional characters iconic status for the purpose of historic relevancy is a risky business. Follett takes his chances here and falls flat. The players in this story are shabbily drawn. They do little to engage listener interest or empathy. In his attempt to touch all the bases attending Western society up to and through WW I, his reliance upon coincidence is self-consciously overwrought. The more historically-minded will appreciate a tolerable deference to the accuracy of events as they unfolded - particularly in Russia - but in his effort to represent a comprehensive chronology, he sacrifices plot and character. Good concept; bad execution.