"The two most important days of your life are the day you were born and the day you find out why" Mark Twain
There are a lot of reviews about this book, most of them are positive and most of them are focused on how Ken Follett can tell a fictional story while teaching his readers factual parts of history. And I think most of these reviews are accurate. The listener will enjoy a very well told story and learn about the causes and circumstances that led to WWI.
I think my favorite thing about The Fall of Giants is how the listener gains a sense of camaraderie with the characters and their feelings. The story helped me see that most of the victims of wars, especially in some of the more aggressive nations, are everyday citizens. Follett does a great job helping you realize that people are people, each with complex emotions and feelings. Just like every German in WWII wasn't a Nazi-loving fascist, we can now realize that every Afghani is also not a Taliban-loving terrorist. It just makes you appreciate humanity for what it is - at least thats how I felt.
Another thing I want to point out is that Follett obviously touts the principles of socialism and more liberal ideologies throughout his novels. This isn't so much of a complaint as it is a recognition of his bias. Nonetheless it was a phenomenal novel and I highly recommend all 31 hours of it.
I am now a fan of Ken Follet. Jon Lee makes the listen great. He is able to make the book come alive. Can not wait for the next book
I enjoy war novels and was excited to read this one because of the phenomenal reviews. However 4 hours later I had to shut it off - there is way too much sex and not enough story.
The opening scene revolves around a 13 year-old boy staring at his genitalia, disappointed it hadn't grown or didn't look like his friends genitalia. The author cannot introduce an attractive woman into the story without all the characters mentally undressing and sleeping with her before the plot can advance.
I get it, all men are pigs are all women secretly want men to be pigs - can we get back to the story now?!?!?!?!?
I have read a bit about World War II and the Civil War, and even the American Revolution, but I surprised to discover the gap in my knowledge about World War I. This book did an excellent of correcting that deficiency. By intertwining the stories of Russian, German, English, and American families, the book helped me understand a lot more about the history of the early 20th century.
One of the highlight's to me was when Follett described the commandeering of all of the taxi's in Paris in the early days of the war to transport troops to the front lines, since all of the trains were in use. Recognizing that Follett doesn't make stuff like this up, I went to the internet and found video of the historical event to which he referred, and was just tickled that he had worked that story into his account. I didn't realized that there would have been so many taxis in existence by the time of WWI, and that they could be used to transport troops was just amazing to me.
Addicted to Audible!
I am a Ken Follett fan so all I can say is that I LOVED this book. Yes, it does have a bit of melodrama and romance but it also refreshed my memory on the beginnings of WWI. I liked the characters, thought they were of course stereotypes but aren't we all??? I look forward to books 2 &3 and maybe a miniseries!
I generally avoid fiction, but I enjoyed the Audible versions of "Pillars of the Earth" and "World without End" very much. "Fall of Giants" is the first of a planned triology and I hope Follett completes that project. It is a stand-alone novel like the others mentioned. I regret that I just didn't find the story compelling as the previous two. It may well be just a matter of personal taste. However, I also hoped to be more informed by the historical rendering, context, and prose. I guess I was just spoiled by those two other works. Read other reviews and make up your own mind ... I just came away disappointed somewhat.
I am amazed at the number of critics who gave this book a poor review and then COMPLETELY missed the boat as to WHY it might be labeled a poor effort!
Most of the critics I saw referenced poor character development, which by the way utter HOGWASH. The vast majority of the book is devoted to character development - and masterful character development at that.
While the book does plod along at times, I believe it was clearly Follett's intent to do so as he sets the stage for parts 2 and 3, with exhaustive character development in this initial offering.
Secondly, a good number of critics attack the fact there are no significant villains in this story. Again, the reviewers not only missed the boat, but they let the oars bounce off their collective noggins with those comments ;)
There are several MINOR characters who are evil and or malicious, and most of them due to their incompetence and/or inexperience as wartime officers. These characters, from an overall perspective, along with the WAR itself, are the evil antagonists of the book - and again, positioned and developed quite well by Follet.
Lastly, whomever would label Ken Follett's work in its entirety as anything other than fine literary work is simply opening mouth and inserting foot with a feeble attempt to boost their ego with braggadocio that simply proves they have no idea what they are saying.
In summary, it's a good start, but whether or not it develops into a good trilogy is yet to be seen. As a standalone product, it will rate poorly. Clearly we really have no idea if it will rival POE and WWE at this point. So far, I am guessing "probably not"; but if I had to guess, I'd say it's still probably going to be worth the time and money.
One of Follet's best I think. We know all too little about the complexities that led us to WWI and ultimately to WWII through a flawed peace agreement in 1918. All that told through the lives of individual human beings, both entitled aristocrats and struggling lower class folks seeking a better life. A great read (listen). One small criticism, John Lee, who I love, seemed rushed at first but later settled down and got his pacing better.
Say something about yourself!
I am not a huge Ken Follett fan, and tend to gravitate toward such authors as Russell Banks, Jonathan Safron Foer, Julia Glass, Nicole Krause, Geraldine Brooks, and Audrey Niffenegger. But I do like books in the "sweeping sage" genre, long books that give me a lot of character detail. For these reasons, I bought this book..
It started off verrrrry slow for me. I don't know why, because the narration was quite good and, on paper, the character should have been very compelling. I nearly ditched it (me, a lover of history, esp. WWI-era history!) when it bogged-down in the middle, during all the in-fighting among porminent Russian Revolutionaries.
But I am pleased that I stuck with it. For me, it came to a satisfying conclusion. And I am looking forward (not with jumping-out-of-my-shoes eagerness, but a pleasant, that-will-be-nice kind of looking forward) to the next installment, which will lead into WWII. It should bring up some very intriguing plot twists.
If you want a really great historical novel, filled with intrigue, fast-pacing, and terrific characters navigating real-life events, read Louis Bayard's "The Black Tower." I couldn't stop listening and I hated to see it end!
Although Follett can tend toward being a bit formulaic, he writes great stories. I like this one particularly because it puts you right in the turmoil of the Russian revolution and in the middle of the discontent in Britain over the incompetency of their war leaders. This is a fascinating story. I learned a great deal about the period between the Archduke's assassination and the actual start of the war. Most histories skip this eventful sequence.