I have given up on listening because the narration is so poor and there's not enough insight or original thought to overcome that problem. Maybe the basic idea can't be stretched out into a full-length book.
Unknown, I need to finish this one, but the download is faulty and I can't finish listening to it.
I would recommend the book but not the audible version.
The book has a significant lack of emphasis on research and a lot of anecdotal and situational evidence but makes strong arguments nonetheless. The idea could be summarized in 10 pages easily but is greatly expounded in a much larger format with in depth, although biased, analysis. Nudge is a similar book that seems more based on research but is still very biased. Both books, however, help a business owner identify how to help formulate the choices that are available to their consumers.
The narrator was very difficult to listen to which is surprising from someone who has narrated so many books. Enunciation was all over the place with significant emphasis placed in seemingly every word.
Interesting and often times counter intuitive, which is the point more often than not. I feel that I have gained a greater understanding of the unhappiness of the modern world. I would often be reminded of the Devo anthem, " freedom of choice, is what you got. Freedom from choice, is what you want." I love the results of the many interesting experiments.
Most of the concepts in the book are familiar to fans of pop psychology. The author also occasionally makes logically questionable claims. For example, he suggests that the explosion of choice is substantially responsible for the increasing rates of depression in America in recent decades, ignoring somewhat more likely culprits such as obesity, improved diagnostics and reduced stigma. He also gets pretty repetitive after a while; in some ways, I'd have preferred reading this one paperback so I could skip the boring parts (e.g., the opening 15 minute trip through the supermarket. We get it already! We saw it coming a mile off!). After listening to this book, I will look for more opportunities in my life to satisfice, rather than optimize, so it has been persuasive in that regard. Perhaps worth listening to once, to be convinced on that point, but I'm probably not going to re-listen to this one too many times.
The author comes off as a very old man who just can't get used to the fact that you actually have choices in what jeans you can buy. He just keeps ranting on and on about the exact number of types of cereals etc he found at the store. One such story could have been a good example, but he just keeps droning on and on.
He did an okay job, not sure you can make this material interesting no matter how you read it.
It worked really well as a sleeping "pill". If I was having trouble sleeping, I would listen to this as it is so boring that I usually feel asleep pretty quickly. Unfortunately, I mean that quite literally.
Part pop psychology, part behavioral economics, part self-help book, 'The Paradox of Choice: Why More is Less' points out all the ways in which a super-abundance of choice is often not a good thing, touching on responsibility, regret, gratitude, opportunity costs, expectations, social status, search costs, subjective vs. objective satisfaction and more. We're introduced to the concepts of 'maximizers' and 'satisficers' – people who need to know that they've made the best possible choice from all the alternatives, and people who make choices based on standards they have set themselves. (As the author points out, we're often maximizers in some areas and satisficers in others.) He makes compelling arguments that satisficers are happier than maximizers with the choices they make, and goes on to suggest strategies for training yourself to become a satisficer in more areas of your life.
I thought this last part was less convincing – as someone married to an inveterate maximizer, I'm not convinced it would be possible to change this personality trait. Still, just being aware of the problems of trying to be a maximizer is no doubt a step in the right direction.
Some of the book feels a little repetitive, and some areas are a little wordy (over explaining some pretty obvious points) – I thought it could probably have been edited down by 10-15%.
As for this Audible production, I really liked the narrator (in contrast to many other reviewers, it seems). He kind of reminded me of Frasier's younger brother, Niles. OK, I can see how that might be annoying . . . but I thought it suited the material well.
Not sure, it is a bit academic
Again, quite academic. Not sure that this book works as an audiobook.