Kneel Before Zod!!
The story and great narration.
Dave Gurney, he was very interesting.
A more than one, hard to say without giving away points of the story.
An audiobook can only be successful if the listener gets wrapped up in that narrators rendition. For me, this was not the case. Shut Your Eyes Tight was narrated by Scott Brick and I would say that book was better than this one for the sole purpose of the narration. It was hard to tell when one voice or conversation ended and another began so I did get thrown off at probably some key points. There are times where he tries to shake it up a little bit and add a different voice or tone here and there, but he doesn't keep it consistant so I found myself saying..Who is this now? I was getting aggitated by his voice and had to shut it off and take some deep breaths. It's bad when the review isnt about a book at all, but about narration. I don't need a Hollywood production, but I do have to find the reading pleasant and at least interesting. He is boring. Thru and thru. Be careful with this one. You might be better buying the paper novel and listen to the audio with the other 2 in this series.
I liked the character, the story and the reader. Thoroughly enjoyed the book. So much so that I already downloaded John Verdon's second novel. Yes, some of the clues come together in rather unbelievable ways -- but most actually seem feasible. What's best is that you are given the puzzle pieces at the same time as the detectives, so you can figure out the puzzle right along with them. The reader is not a character himself (like, for example, I am guessing Scott Brick will be in the second novel) -- he never detracts or distracts. Good job.
This book deserves all the praise it's been getting. The story grabbed me right from the beginning. It is intelligent, very well written, strong character development, and a plot that is entirely unpredictable (at least so far: I haven't finished yet). The narration is terrific. I have already recommended this book to about ten people. Verdon is a master.
Good original story, but the unabridged version has periods of slow pontification that just drag. Narration is more of a read than a performance. Still, the story makes it a worthwhile listen, but you might want the abridged version if available.
No, I love mysteries!
I guess I don't know if the performance was the problem, I just got tired of it.
This novelists spends very much more time with murky, unbelievable "psychology" than with the plot as such. It is very hard to see where the story is going, while we are asked to agonize over the inner feelings and uncertainties of just about every character in the story. OK for compulsive worriers, but not much use for ordinary readers (listeners).
I read science, biographies, histories, mysteries, adventures, thrillers, educationals, linguistics but not no way, not no how, romances.
I really, really wanted to like this book. I tried. I finished it despite know, halfway through, that it would not get better for me. That's unfortunate as it's not terrible, the narrator is passable, the characters aren't unlikable. But there is no spark to it. And if nothing else, a story about an inventive killer should be mystical, it should envelop the reader in a shroud of wonder and excitement. None of that is here. If any book I've ever read felt like it was written by a committee, this was it.
To begin, the main character receives a call from an old college friend. This man has received a message that seems to have read his mind. Later (and I mean much later, the opening of this book dragged on forever) there is a brutal murder committed in a way that makes no sense (snowy footprints disappear in the middle of a field) and the killer seems to be playing a long game against the cops. It all sounds very clever. There are two issues.
The first is that there is very little action. Most of the book is people sitting down and examining and discussing and discussing again. It takes hours for something new to happen. The main character doesn't even seem to be very engaged in the murders or the investigation. He has troubles at home and by the end of the book there hasn't even been any resolution to those troubles.
Then there's the issue with the mystery. It's not very mysterious. I figured out how the killer did everything about hour six. The book is 13 and a half hours long. So that was over 7 hours of waiting for the characters to catch up to me. It was an aggravating way to read a book. Without action, this book of constant examination on matters I'd already deduced seemed just stupid.
I wanted to like it, as I love detective stories. And I don't need a mystery to be unendingly clever. It can be very simple (like the wonderful Harry Hole books by Jo Nesbo). But this book rests entirely on the brilliance of a killer who - actually - isn't that brilliant. It's not bad. But you can do better.
I stopped after listening to a little more than 2 hours of this book. It did not hold my interest as the reader did not put inflection in his voice or feeling in his characters. I listen to the samples each time I buy a book but it seems that whoever selects the samples finds a good part and uses that. I would like a sample that starts with the first page of the book. If the reader and/or book does not grab me after a few pages I will continue to look. If you buy something at a store and it isn't what you think it is, you can return it. This book isn't what I thought it was. How do you get your credit back? And does anyone from customer service actually read the comments?
I have listened to 3 hours and 29 minutes of this book and if i wanted to read a psychology book I know many others that would hold my interest more than this- It was touted as a psychological thriller but if it takes mores than 3 hours to get to the "thriller" part- I give up. I want my credit back.