Disappointing. One of the few audible books I did not finish. Too much generalization from anecdote to principle. This may be the way that pop knowledge is created but it's not good science.
I had to stop listening after listening to the first 5 hours (out of a total of 10).
The beginning of the book is spent decrying the shallowness of the internet age, without really going into great detail or citing any convincing research. Marshall McLuhan is name-checked, along with his idea that the "medium is the message." The differences between oral and literate culture are discussed, along with the many wondrous changes that Gutenberg's printing press brought to the world. There's a tangent on Nietzsche, and the idea that his transition to using an early typewriter changed his writing style. All of this feels like filler material, simply reinforced by the inclusion of luminaries such as McLuhan, Gutenberg, and Nietzsche.
Then the rant really starts...
He complains that reading an ebook in a web browser-based interface is terribly distracting because of incoming emails and other notifications, without mentioning that these notifications can be silenced (so that they needn't even be actively ignored).
The first generation kindle is described. Much significance is placed on the fact that it had a full keyboard, and that the device could be used to browse the web (a potential distraction!). The fact is, just about every dedicated ebook reader since has done away with a full physical keyboard, and anyone that has bothered trying probably knows that web-browsing on an e-ink screen is an extremely unpleasant experience.
Second-hand speculations are recounted, such as the idea that books of the future will have "live" comments sections, or that they'll be crowdsourced mashups of previous works, or that they'll be full of search-engine-optimized phrases in order to appear at the top of search results.
I don't know about you, but none of this speculation or trivia is interesting to me.
In the age of information we live today, this book will show you differences of man and machine. It will also show why we are incapable of multitasking effectively, and why we shouldn't multitask in the first place.
Because I like learning history and trivia
Very long winded. It goes on and on about obvious and trivial details. Might be more interesting in 10 years to a generation who more removed from life before the internet
I was hoping for something deeper and less reactionary, maybe something about how young people are developing with the technology, perhaps from a less outsider-feeling perspective. Instead it was very concerned with the loss of reading. Understandable, but given undue emphasis. The book is, ironically, pretty shallow an analysis of the impact the internet has had on our thinking.
Perhaps his affect would be less grating when used in a book that is less hoity-toity.
Boredom (which I'm sure the author would take to indicate my internet-ruined brain. And perhaps it is, but it doesn't make the book any more compelling or fresh).
This book is very informative and about some really relevant and important things we should be paying attention to in our media driven culture. However, some of the chapters main ideas or arguments are somewhat repetitive and the digressions and stories can bore you at times. Overall, really thoughtful and informative book. Good read.
I love learning thru books, about life, people and ways to be better. My best listen so far? The Power of Now, have a good listen!
I imagined a book like this would be based on research. I've only read 50% of the book because it was so Shallow I couldent go on, but so far all of autors arguments wore "Because me and my friends can't read more then one page, then it means the whole world can't read more then one page". Sorry, I read a book per week and although I think internet is making us more shallow and read less, I was hopping to encounter some solid research, instead this books seams a description on how the autor and his friends are behaving, which is not very usefull in my opinion.