Loved it--I couldn't wait to get back in the car for my 3,000-mile road-trip each day so that I could continue to listen to this magnificent book. Compelling, amazing characters, interesting plot, insights into the psyche--it's all there!
It was very surprising to me. I have to admit that I stopped it about 30 minutes into it, and didn't pick it back up for about three months. I found it strange at first, all the different characters. Then I found myself really getting into the audio and I couldn't put it down. My advice to anyone is stick with it, because once it was over... I was like "This seriously is one of the best books I've experienced!" I actually want to buy the hard copy and read it myself.
Wow, there really are a lot of memorable moments, but for me... I couldn't help but fall in love with Rob Freeman. As screwed up as Bennie and Sasha are, I loved their characters too.
I thought she did a good job.
The most memorable is of course Bennie Salazar and then Sasha. Mainly because every story involves them in some way. Even if they are not in that story.
I really liked La Doll and I felt sorry for her. It is like I said earlier though, Rob was my favorite. You know in the beginning something is going to happen to him, but until Jennifer Egan leads you to his story, you haven't a clue what's really going to happen, and then when you find out... it is overwhelming how much love you wind up finding yourself have for this young man. Also, if you find yourself thinking, I am confused and I don't want to listen anymore. Please listen! The reason is... I thought Jennifer Egan did a great job of tying everything together at the end.
rarely do I not finish a book, but I couldn't get interested in the characters and
Friends say I have a twisted sense of humor and this book fits the bill!
I didn't like the characters at the start of this story, but it's worth sticking with the book as the characters change with each chapter. The author builds on earlier chapters, introducing new characters related in fascinating ways to earlier characters. I enjoy the side-tracks the author takes in various places, seemingly going off track. There are many astute observations of human nature in this book. It's not a 5-star book on my list because I thought the wrap up/ending seemed contrived.
Business Physicist and Astronomer
I enjoyed the first half of this book very much. The next 1/4 was a little tedious and the final 1/4th unbearable. The book runs out of gas just doesn't go forward with any torque or strength after the mid point.
That said, it's an interesting approach but I can't recommend it as worth the time.
There is no Frigate like a Book To take us Lands away Nor any Coursers like a Page Of prancing Poetry – Emily Dickinson
I like the message of this book and the artistry of it... the way the characters are revealed in fits and starts over a period of years, and how we don't really see the logic of how or why they are included until much later. And the message: that life and time are not kind to us and, in fact, are like a goon (thug) who robs us of our youth, innocence and sometimes our success. It is also interesting the way every single chapter is written in either a different style or a different point of view or tone or something to make it stand out from all the other chapters. The problem is that it isn't that compelling , for me anyway, to read because half the time you don't know why things are happening or who a character is, and it just gets annoying. Some chapters were annoying for that reason at the same time you could appreciate the beauty or skill involved in the writing. The power point chapter was pretty boring , BUT it also revealed what happened to Sasha who was one of the main characters so, in a way, it was really satisfying and poignant - and I did appreciate the skill in using that format and managing to get a story across and also make me feel sad, happy, and appreciative at the same time. (Best to read/see/hear the Power Point chapter on J.Egan's website, BTW.) So, for me it was both good and bad. I loved the description of the Uncle Ted who folded his passion in half, and then in half again, and again.... until there was nothing left. A great image. And the chapter about Jules Jones interviewing Kitty was hysterical! Lots of skillful writing, so it wasn't all bad by any means.
Apparently, the committee who selects the Pulitzer Prize for fiction is easily impressed with narrative tricks. The story moves forward and backward in time and switches voices and characters repeatedly. That's all good and well, but it leaves the reader wanting something. The story seems to revolve around two central characters whose stories are told not just through their perspectives, but the perspectives of those that surround them as well. Often, these connections gets stretched too thin: character development remains somewhat superficial. It comes off more as a collection of short stories than a novel.
The narrator for this title spoke a little too slowly for my taste. I had to stop listening after an hour or so because I was driving and thought I was going to nod off. I don't think her voice is the right pitch for me. I think she did a good job of differentiating voices, but that still seemed somewhat generic to me.
Depends on whether the friend would be interested in its particular subject matter
the narrator's voice probably ruined this book for me. It was monotone and it was hard to tell when different characters were speaking
wonder about the pulitzer requisites
I think the writing is exceptional, and I think the narration on this audiobook did detract from its story. Overall though I am not sure why the book was so praised, it offered a dance of tangled characters whose connection wasn't always clear till too late in the particular story. Suspense was done well throughout.
I read the print version in addition to listening to the audio book. I liked reading the book much better than listening to it. I think the narration was really good, but the story does not translate that well to the audio in my opinion. If I had to do it over, I would not have chosen the audio version to listen to. This book is not really a traditional narrative at all. The style is not so plot-centric. Some of the chapters were really very good to listen to, while others were difficult because of stylistic choices, such as a chapter with many footnotes and a chapter written entirely in Power Point. If I had not read the book previously, I am sure these would have been confusing. Further, there are a lot of characters that fade in and out, and I think they were far easier to keep straight in print. I loved this book. It definitely deserved all of the accolades it won. I would just recommend it in print, as opposed to the audio version.