Stephen King, yes, Lorna Raver, maybe.
He should have shaved a hundred or more pages off the story (typical for him). The editing was poor, and the character arcs didn't match the intensity that King was trying to achieve. The entire thing seemed to fall apart about three quarters of the way through and it wasn't that good to begin with.
Depends on the book. She did poorly on some characters, but her narrative voice was solid throughout. I think she was the wrong person for the story.
The book had parts that kind of kept interest, but it was very scattered. I understand why he said he didn't remember writing much of the story, I would want to forget it too. He had to be drunk to come up with something like Cujo.
Physician and busy mom of three in Northern California.
Near the top
Slow build. A bit talky at times but so classic King. So many details required to result in the tragic and terrible conclusion
Yes. It is sickening, sad, tragic twisted. All King's standard stuff.
If you like King, you gotta read it.
AUDIBLE MAKES READING POSSIBLE AND EASY FOR ME...I AM VISUALLY IMPAIRED. I WISH THEY HAD ALL THE BOOKS I WANT I WOULD SNAP THEM UP!
yes but only for those who can take extreme tension and who like scary books.
memorable is not a word i would use for cujo. scary is a better word. the scariest moment for me was when cujo got donna's leg and stomach. also when the dog killed the policeman, gary, and joe (whom i found unlikable--but no one deserves what happened to him)
favorite? another inappropriate word. the book is plain scary. maybe when chaity bought joe the chain pull (or what ever you call it) and then made the deal so she could visit her sister.
i know donna should be. but that mean guy joe comes to mind.
it was pretty hard to read it was so tense. i had to read another book at the same time to break up the book. i wanted to hear the whole book...every word but i know i would not have been able to if i had not broken the tension once in a while.
seen the movie and read the book. i do know when i read the book i often skipped pages when it got too scary.
it was a good read.
This is yet another wonderfully gruesome tale from King. Blood guts ... and dog drool, got to love that. The story was told well and with good emotion but the the narrator (Lorna Raver) made some strange choices in the voices which she gave to the characters . Everyone sounded very old . All in all though , good stuff!!
This book was great, I don't want to give any spoilers to this book, so I am limited on what to write. I just wanted to say that I loved this book, and Stephen King rocks!!
Along with Christine, Cujo is my favorite Stephen King audio book. Christine though is a fun read, while Cujo deals with real life monsters and therefore can be taken more seriously.
The reality of it. Sin (adultery, drunkeness, carelessness, lack of communication) leads ultimately to the creation of a monster (a closet monster) that cannot be dealt with, with monster words. Dracula really cannot be beaten by wearing a cross, superficial religion that does not actually deal with sin - cannot save.
As a pastor I appreciate that Stephen King seems to deal with total depravity and its very real monstrous impact on our world - theological accuracy!
No, but I almost did not purchase this audiobook because of so many negative reviews of Raver's performance. Yet, in my opinion she was outstanding. I was pleasantly suprised with how she handled even the male voices and because the book does include prominent female voices I believe she was a good choice to narrate.
I guess it is a matter of taste but in my opinion Raver's narration of this book compares favorably with any other narration of any book by any narrator I have heard.
Gary Pervier is my favorite. His soft heart toward Cujo endears you to him in spite of his many faults. Raver does a great job with his voice.
The whole thing. I remember reading this as a teen, but i don't remember it being so awful. That goes to show you teens have poor judgement. There was so much written in this novel that was completely unnecessary. If all that was removed, it would have been a very clever short story. King could have written less about the things that didn't add to the story line and more about things that would, and then It could have made a good novel. But in the end, the part about the dog was good and the only god part of the book.
No. not at all. I love these types of books, I just need to be more selective with Stephen King's novels.
I thought she was wonderful given what she was reading. I'm suprised she didn't sound as bored as I was hearing it. I think that speaks very well to her performance.
All of those sales and advertising exects. And the bloody vomit cereal. I mean really?
You must really LOVE Steven King to get this book.
Cujo is one of the early King books that got me hooked on his style. King is not just the master of horror, but a true master of story telling. Cujo takes one of the most lovable dogs known to man and turns it into a true monster. I will not look at a Saint Bernard in the same way again. Glad this book finally made it to audio book on Audible.
Now about the narrator. I have listened to many hundreds of audio books and I have heard some bad narrators before, but come on.....she is not that bad at all! (I think it was State of Fear where I could hear the narrators rumbling stomach throughout the entire reading :)She is no Frank Muller, but who is? Her reading of the final action scene is very well done and pulls you into the action. Not sure why the other reviewers dog piled on her, but please don't let those reviews stop you from enjoying a great book from a good reader.
Had Donna and/or her husband had the common sense to have some defense training, she would have removed the Lady Smith from her purse and shot Cujo through the window thereby avoiding much heartbreak and misery. Of course King would then not have had this unrealistic novel to write. Of course, King would never arm any of his characters because it is better for them to die from stupidity than live because they were able to defend themselves.
Only books contribed by agenda driven authors.
She did the best she could with the material at hand.
Everything after Donna shoots the rabid killer dog Cujo, and the family goes on their way.
Cujo is an example of how a politically agendized writer can twist what would be an easily remedied situation into a hellish nightmare for the politically correct who would allow their family to suffer rather than take reasonable steps to protect themselves. This also holds true for those who travel into the wilderness to pet grizzly bears (with no protection) in the belief that their liberal love for all deadly creatures (animal and human) will be rewarded by being spared from the killer instincts that nature has instilled within those creatures, after which some sad book or movie is written detailing the removal of life and/or limb.Other than that I don't have much of an opinion. (smile)
Don't buy into the haters of Lorna Raver, I've heard so much worse. At least there is no god forsaken music inserted (like so many other King listens). A classic! Loved it!