Probably not. This book taught me a lesson - even though I might be interested in a particular era of history, there are historians, like Richard J. Evans (author) that are far more knowledgeable. If you are looking for names of people and political parties that influenced Germany's place in European history, then this is the book. It has enough references to keep you busy for the rest of your life. If you are looking for a simple book that explains the rise and fall in the Third Reich in common, simple terms, then this is the wrong book. This is a hard core, factual account of European events from the mid 19th century through the mid 20th century with emphasis on Germany . It is not intended for the listener that is looking for entertainment simultaneous with education. The book was wasted on me.
It rates right up there at the top of all the books I have read or listened to.
All the back ground facts.
I thought I knew how this man crept up the power chain until I listened to this account. Anyone wanting to avoid evil should read or listen to this book.
High School Reading and English Teacher
Details the complex web of circumstances that allowed Hitler to rise to power. Clearly his personality was unique in the combinations of his passions, his ruthlessness, and his political savvy, but the circumstances he took advantage of had to foster certain fears and desires among wide segments of society. This makes sense of it.
This is a great book, the first in a trilogy about the Third Reich. A lot has been written about Nazi Germany over the years, but this trilogy is unique in its extensive examination of life under the Third Reich through the use of letters, diaries, and eyewitnesses' accounts. Rather than focusing on just the political aspects of the era, Richard Evans also covers the culture and daily of life of regular people under the Nazi regime.
The first book begins decades before the Third Reich, and in it we learn that the beliefs expressed by the Nazis in their most extreme form were present in Germany since the days of Bismarck. It follows German history through the Great War and the shock of defeat. It examines the "stab in the back" myth and the German public's reaction to the Treaty of Versailles. It looks at fringe movements in German politics during the inter-war years, including the Nazi party. One of the most fascinating chapters in the book is about the seizure of power itself, when conservative politicians grossly miscalculated Hitler's influence by agreeing to a coalition government with the Nazi leader as premier. After taking power by "legal" means, Hitler proceeded to systematically eliminate all opposition, including his conservative allies, in building his totalitarian regime.
The performance is adequate but somewhat monotonous. It actually improves in the second and third books, as you can notice the narrator's subtle emotional response when describing the atrocities against european minorities perpetrated by the Nazis.
This is an essential trilogy for anyone with even a passing interest in 20th century history. I highly recommend it.
A great deal of history with explanations about traditions and beliefs were conveyed in a flowing account that was captivating. I came away realizing how little I knew about German beliefs and history impeded in the culture.
I highly recommend this book, and the other two in the trilogy. This first book provides details, in a definitive and entertaining way, illustrating how economic, social, military, political and cultural issues created the environment which allowed the Third Reich to come into existence and metastasize. I probably shouldn't use the medical term which conveys an emotional tone since the author's position is that the information should be presented objectively. He does present the information objectively and I agree that is the correct way.
It shows how arguably the most civilized society on the planet was transformed into one of the most uncivilized. It is hard to overstate the need for understanding this period in history and I believe this book goes a long way in providing that understanding. The extreme hardships and social turmoil in Germany which provided the incubator for the Nazi philosophy may not be unique. We should always remember that Hitler came to power in a democracy.
I liked them all.
One Size Fits None
The three part series by Richard J. Evans is an excellent history of the Third Reich split into three phases: the early years (until 1933), pre-war (1933-1939) and war years. This book is well researched, well thought out, well planned. It's really the foundation for the other two books, if you are going to listen to them.
On one level, reading this book is like sitting in the theater watching the stagehands set up the stage. You know who's going to be coming out and which chairs they'll sit in. You have a general idea where the chairs will probably be, and when the characters will be coming onstage (and sometimes leaving in unfortunate circumstancs). But in this book, the characters aren't entirely the individuals we all know. Some of them are the ideologies that drive the individuals (and the ordinary people whose names we'll never know). After you've heard this book you will come away knowing how the Nazis scrabbled and bullied their way into power. Themes set up in this book persist through the series. If you skipped this one, you would be fine with the others - but if you do listen to it, you'll get much more out of the rest. It could easily stand on its own. But as you get near the end, you're glad there are two more volumes. There's still so much to say.
This book (and the other two books in the trilogy) are must reads for anyone who wants to learn about Nazi Germany. The first book was especially compelling because it gave me the background that I often find lacking in examinations of World War II and the Nazis. I appreciated. At times, I felt overwhelmed by the amount of detail and because I did not know the names and their spellings. I simply listened to the book again to pick up those details. The book is depressing, heartbreaking, and even on occasion uplifting. It was nice to see a well rounded, objective approach to the subject. The narrator did an excellent job. I wish that he was the narrator of another book I am about to finish. It would have made the other work much easier to wade through. I cannot recommend this work highly enough.
The White Queen
Yes, but only if reading the actual text was impractical. Despite how distracting the poor narration can be at times, the material is compelling enough that even some truly egregious errors and disorienting stops and "stutters" are able to be ignored.
This book is the answer to questions that linger after reading all the rest. Not that it provides the reader with a clear, black and white answer to the question "How could anyone murder millions of people?"; not at all. That is left to the reader to formulate from the evidence provided.
As such, it is a mistake to condemn the author for distancing himself from making moral judgments about the events he describes. Evans has no need to spend valuable time and space on such exposition; that is the reader's job. It's his job to narrate events and provide guidance in the realm of interpretation, cause, and effect. He doesn't ignore the moral consequences.
Rather, he highlights the landmarks on what was essentially a moral "journey" for the Germans. The rantings of polemicists about the "Jewish Question" eventually turned that phrase into the modern day equivalent of "The War on Terror" or "Wall Street vs. Main Street Economics"; that is, it went from being something only a few extremists yapped on about to something that was on the table in any discussion and was accepted the same way many Americans right now accept that Al Qaeda and Muslims started the war in Iraq and Afghanistan or that rich financiers destroyed our economy.
Note; I'm not saying they are wrong! I'm saying it's a valid topic for discussion with a clear, anonymous, conspiratorial villain of vast powers, and a way of framing a "question' as to guarantee its "answer".
What this book does is explain how what we think of as a single nation of "Germans" was really a conglomeration of various minority populations that had been consolidated only in the latter half of the 19th Century. This union was held together by leaders with strong personalities and iron fists.
The failures of the "kinder, gentler" post-World War I Weimar Republic to stabilize the economy, feed the people, and make any kind of meaningful decisions did not instill respect for democratic rule. It only promoted nostalgia for when the trains ran on time, reinforcing the romantic myth of the "Leader".
Disturbing parallels abound throughout history, not the least of which was the one in Italy at the same time. "Il Duce" means the same thing as "Der Fuhrer", and this fact only stresses that although Germany was devastated after World War I, it was not the only European nation threatened with disintegration from the foundations up at that time.
In short, this is a great buy. I don't really regret ignoring warnings about the narrator, because being able to listen to the book being read aloud is a major convenience and a prime reason for buying it for that purpose alone. I just don't have my hands and eyes free to read when I am working, and being able to switch between music and a book for variety is wonderful. The narrator is poor, there is no doubt about that. But I was able to get past that and concentrate on the material. It is that compelling, and definitely worth your Audible credit despite the flaws.
The narrator is clearly inexperienced and inconsistent in his pronunciation of relatively well-known and simple German, French, Russian, and English words. I can only deduce that a very incomplete knowledge of the subject matter itself is at the root of the narrator's strange pauses, emphasis on the wrong words, and the overall tendency to read this the same way one reads a grocery list or a Chinese take-away menu out loud.
I like the way the author strings events together. He is especially good when explaining the historical contect of some of the Nazis' legislative actions and showing how they weren't necessarily as radically thought of as we do now after 80 years. He showed how many of the political parties and actors agreed with the actions taken by the Nazis after they got into power. He did well in explaining how their message before coming to power was pretty generic, so that most segments of the population could agree on the broad principles that they espoused. Not until after they got into power did they show their total disregard for anyone who disagreed with them and their ruthlessness in eliminating dissent, segment by segment. It gives meaning to the old saying,
The author's stated intent was to introduce this topic to those who knew nothing. I know some of the topic but have never had it tied together like this book does. The author also dumbed down some of the German phrases like