He brought technology to Europe (the printing press) and the Frogs used the press to rewrite history labeling them Mongolian idiots. Weatherford says Genghis was not a religious man. All I can say is somebody was whispering in his ear.
There is no doubt that I learned more in 14 hours than a semester in college. The story of Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World is great, but I really have my doubts because the author seems to make Mongols to have no harm and no foul. I found the book to be extremely bias to Genghis Khan and his people, but yet there is very little information on the man.
It just seems like Genghis Khan was a good guy that wouldn't hurt a fly, but conquered more through his successors.
It didn't make sense.
The performance of the narrator was not good. There were times where I fell asleep because of the monotone voice.
I have no more interest on this subject.
Completely lacking in any hint of objectivity. Slavish devotion to and awe of Genghis Khan causes me to suspect most of the claims made by the author. Further, the book was ridiculously and unnecessarily long. It just kept going and going, making the same points over and over and over. Then we get a 70 minute epilogue that restates the entire book again! I genuinely believe that the author somehow got this published without review by an editor, or his editor was afraid to trim a single word.
The author relies essentially on two source documents, the rest is conjecture and hyperbole.
I love non-fiction, particularly history. And there's so much potential in this story. So, it doesn't "turn me off from the genre" but I know now to run away from future books by this author.
Bland. Like hearing someone narrate a recipe.
The book could have been 50% shorter without detracting from it. Make an interesting point and then move on. Don't congratulate yourself by making the EXACT SAME POINT 5 to 10 more times.
I can't believe I stuck with the book all the way to the end. It was like a marathon-I just wanted to see if I had the fortitude to finish it.
Genghis Khan was not who you think. At least, he wasn't who *I* thought he was.
I was unaware of most of the historical and cultural facts presented in this book, and found them fascinating. The book spends too much time detailing tortures and killings for my taste, but otherwise I found it entertaining and educational in a good way. The reader was a bit too dry for my taste, droning on about "forest products" like the narrator of a classroom geography film from the mid-1960s. But he wasn't a deal-killer, and the history was interesting enough for me to stick with it all the way through.
I sure can't echo the positive reviews on this book. The first half of the book is about the life of Genghis Khan, himself. That was moderately interesting (but not great).
It's the second half of the book where this falls apart. The second half deals with the aftermath of Genghis Khan's death. The author tries to cover a huge swath of history in too brief a fashion. It's like reading the Cliff Notes of a history book.
I gave up about 1/3 through the second half and didn't even finish!
As others have noted, the story is dramatic, the writing great, the narrative well done. (Some scholars and critics have questioned the overall perspective, but there's no serious question about the scholarship.)
My concern is with the organization of the audio. The "introduction" to the paper book appears as an "afterword" in the audio, at the end of the reading. This is a MAJOR flaw, because the introduction explains much about how the author can know things about Genghis Khan, particularly the history of something called "The Secret History." After my wife and I had listened to the first hour or two, we were thoroughly confused about the references to The Secret History. We finally stopped at a bookstore, looked at the paper book, and discovered the introduction. Only when I got to the end of the audio did I find the paper "introduction" added as an "afterword."
I like autumn night times. Curtains drawn. The dim lamp. Chaired with a book. Fireside hours. A warm peace.
The beginning starts out fairly interesting. It highlights the more interesting aspects of the Genghis Khan (GK) history, however, the writing seems to blend together in the second half. While approaching the end of the book, the author's language seemed as though he was running out of things to say and just decided mix in "the modern world" hence the title. He points out an obvious fact, one thing leads to another. Yes, GK did have a huge influence on Central Asian culture, but so did many other rulers that came before him as well. (i.e. Alexander the Great) It seemed as though the further I got into the book, the more I realized that it's a BASIC (although interesting) history lesson on GK.
Unlike some other reviewers who raved about this, I can't say that I "couldn't put this book down" or it's "a superb piece of writing." After completing this, I will say that I know much more NOW about GK & the Mongols than BEFORE. That's what I took away from it, which is better than not learning anything at all. Overall: Not bad, but nothing spectacular either.
The first half is a fine history of Ghengis Khan and the birth and development of the Mongol empire. The second half of the book takes place after Genghis' death, and covers the Mongol empire's rise and fall.
So we get half a book of perfectly good history and biography, and half a book of sometimes disjointed and murky history and biography.
It isn't just the subject matter that changes at the half-way point; it's the style and the detail that fall off abruptly. The first half is full of specific detail explained clearly, and the second half is full of specific detail that isn't told well or explained well at all. This leads to long sections of details and place names and people's names that don't seem connected to any theme or purpose.
One of the main points of the book is how the Mongol Empire set the tone and structure for so much in the modern world. But this point is really only made in the final few chapters, and the point is not made so well. The impact of the Mongol empire on the modern world is not a theme woven throughout the book, but is instead presented as a summary at the end.
I picked up this book on one of Audible's sales, and I'd say it was worth the $6 I think I paid for it. But it wouldn't be worth any more than that to me. A good book, but not great.
Found nothing wrong with it, typical desire for more facing good work
Conections to the black plague
the skew of personal opinion .. tone of voice, etc.. opinions of topic.. from one more than likely more engrossed in the topic
mostly data with a few smirks
I'd like more referencial data.. maps.. charts.. diagrams of innovations used.. standards knots of the cultures.. stitching patterns.. etc.. yada yada ;)