Boring, repetitive. His reading is ok, I just got bored after about 20 minutes. Tried a couple of times to listen to it and just couldn't do it.
Tony R Jackson
I love to hear an author tell thier story. The way they wrote it. this is what Richard Dawkins and Lalla Ward did and it makes it so much better.
I bought this book in paper back, so that I could read it at work. But about half way I found it on here. I then started listen in the car just when I was driven and before long I was bring it in the house just so I could hear more. I didn't plan on like it this much.
Generally speaking, there will be 3 types of people who will but this book:
a. Those already atheistic or leaning that way;
b. The curious and maybe a bit doubtful, but open minded; and
c. Those who will be very much opposed to the arguments put forth in this book.
If you are in category 1 or 2, I can highly recommend this book. If you are in category 3, no matter how sound the arguments made or how well presented, you will dislike this work, so save your money.
This book had dual narrators. I'm not sure why they went with this, as it could have done without, but it didn't detract from the work. Both narrators were quite talented.
To sum up, I can recommend this work, as it takes what could be an exceptionally dry subject and turns it into an engaging listen.
Burden of proof.
Probably the chapter I like most was the one about climbing Mount Improbable. I've never heard someone explain why the burden of proof regarding God should not ever be placed at the feel of people who don't believe, and that I will never forget.
No, I need to be in the right mood to listen to Dawkins (the mood to pay attention and think).
Dawkins is too smart for me. I have a hard time following what he's saying sometimes which I suspect is just that I'm not smart enough, though I think this is partially the occasional switching of voices for quotations throwing me off.
A lucid and lively explanation of the atheist position that will help clarify one's thought whether one is theistically or atheistically inclined.
Richard Dawkins, whose acuity and humanity shine through his words and his voice.
They both have a pleasant voice and excellent elocution, and their collaboration is outstanding. A pleasure.
Despite the richness of the book which I recommend with enthusiasm to all, I nonetheless do not think that it satisfactorily covers every aspect of the question: in particular, the discussions of "consolation" and "inspiration" do not go far enough — a deeper look at these might make us hesitate after all to change someone else's faith.
Do you read the book before you dislike my reviews?
As I become older, I get further and further from the maker that I was raised to believe in. I don't know why, but I've always question if there is a God. Just because of my upbringing and how I was raised, I still pray to God, hoping there is an another life after this. In my heart, I know there is a true God, but in my mind, all of the evidence that I've seen and read in the Bible and diffident doctrines from other religions besides Christianity, it doesn't makes sense there are any Gods.
This is something that I will never get an answer to until my life ends. I have accepted that my faith is not as strong as others, but I don't consider myself as an atheist either.
Richard Dawkins in "The God Delusion" questions a lot on all faiths. Maybe too much for one to handle. I'm read many books on this subject and the information in this book is just too broad. His ideas and examples are too scatter for someone to get into this subject. He explains a dozen of ideas all at once, but doesn't go in depth for his reasoning. I wished that Dawkins would have narrow the subject down, if God is a delusion and gave scientific examples for the theory, but instead you get everything all at once.
For someone like myself that always questioning their faith, there is no absolute answer. The Book of Job in the Old Testament is one of the best known testimonials in the Bible. Job had it all and then Satan punished him with the permission from God because God and Satan made a bet on Job's faith. God won the bet because Job remained faithful to him and rewards Job at the end.
I have to ask myself on how is this possible. No rational person would torment their child to prove their children's love for their guardian, but God did. This is why I keep reading on this subject, if there is a higher power after this life.
I would definitely recommend this book, to Christian friends and atheist friends. There are not many books about atheism, so I think it would be good for Christians to see that we are not "devil worshippers" or people to be afraid of.
It was for sure worth the time to listen to it. I learned a lot about evolution and the argument for atheism, even though I already consider myself one.
Yes - Enthusiastic narration is provided by the author, who is an accomplished public speaker.
Sam Harris' Moral Landscape
The author knows the material and is extremely passionate. He nails it.
No- I never do books in one sitting.
I might listen to it again. I think he talked about a lot of things that I might gain more from if I were to listen again.
I think the most compelling thing is just how illogical religion and god are and how he demonstrates that. If you can listen to it and really think about it without getting emotional, you can see how illogical it all is.
It was interesting having two readers to clearly distinguish between the author's words and others'.
No. I found myself agreeing with so many things he had to say. I was surprised actually how much I agreed. It's scary to not believe in god or religion when you grow up in a world where so many people believe so strongly and think that without religion you're less of a person. It was nice to hear from someone who has put a lot of thought in to it and made very intelligent and logical arguments.
Facts, Facts, Facts
The author make a solid argument for the belief no god exists. It won't change a religious persons mind, but open minded people should get something out of it.
Any religious person won't get past the first two chapters before they call it rubbish, and shut the audiobook off. It is based on facts, science, and logical arguments. It should give most atheists more ammo.