Don't you just love a great story well told?
They don't call Dawkins "Darwin's Rottweiler" for nothing, he truly destroys "Design Theory". His tone is fervent nearly the point of hostility. Agnostics don't start religious wars, so why the call them "Namby Pamby Fence Sitters?" The good: The voice and timing of the narrators are excellent. He notes how we "pick and choose" selected passages(cited chapter & verse) and ignore the evil ones (allowing you to kill your children for talking back). His argument that our morals have developed independent of The Bible is powerful. He has a point that inculcating children into abstract religion is nonsensical. The bad: He never acknowledges the simple truth, pointed out by others: 'You can't prove a negative'. His 'meme' theory was a tad confusing. Oddly this scholar resorts to quoting a comedian's book to help make two of his points. Finally, I would like to hear far more Bible absurdities than the four or so that both Sweeny and Dawkins chose as the most egregious examples of evil documented and apparently condoned by The Bible. (Such as the avid consent of Lot for his daughters to be raped.)Surely there must be many more, in such a long book, to quote to the radically religious that it is NOT quite the "Good Book" they claim. If you don't want to delve so technically in non-belief get Julia Sweeny's "Letting Go of God" instead. It is probably more persuasive in its brevity and humor and covers nearly all the main topics than 100 pages of Dawkins undoing the logic of those who have "proven God's existence". Lastly, he fails to address the issue that IF there IS a God he/she/it would NEVER let us PROVE God's existence because that knowledge would destroy our free will. A certain threat of a Hell held over our head would change anyone's behavior. If humans create good everywhere with no threat we achieve God's aim, Heaven on Earth.
A purpose..... this is crap as an atheist this was awful! did not prove anything and almost.... made me want to go to church. I said almost
Even though Dawkins denies it, this is a fundamentalist advocacy of atheism and "religion" of Darwinism (natural selection) as to a worldview. Although this is observable within species it breaks down transitionally as well as to the creation of the cosmos. Dawkins denies any possibility of the supernatural to explain the unexplainable but yet relies on it to allow natural selection as the first cause of creation...
Additionally this includes a "gross" misreading of the Bible, taking scripture out of context, not acknowledging the redemption of Jesus Christ and abrogation of the old testament theocracy laws - which demonstrate the fallen, sinful nature of man and the gift of grace - forgiveness of sin (no condemnation/unmerited favor) and the imparting of righteousness through accepting Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior.
To balance these assertions I would recommend reading "Has God Spoken? Proof of God's Divine Inspiration" by Hank Hanegraaf, and other resources online
False religions have long been around and have been warned about throughout the Bible. The solution is not "religion" but "relationship" and knowledge of the Bible and Jesus Christ. This age of scientific enlightenment continues to support the inspired word of God.
I have been married to the same wonderful wife for over 27 years and have two adult children, out of the house, that are married, working, and doing well.
This book was all I need to listen to from Richard Dawkins.
I might listen to more of Richard Dawkins' books.
Yes, I would be willing to listen to more of Richard Dawhins and Lalla Ward's readings, they did a nice job.
The God Delusion did not have characters.
I would focus on what to believe in and not so much what not to believe in.
Richard Dawkins attempts to systematically dispel any and all rationalizations for believing in a supreme being. I believe it is a valiant attempt, but the pure act of trying to convince others that there is no god is, to me, part of a religion in and of itself.
I do not believe in a god for two main reasons: 1) It makes me feel better than believing that there is a god, and 2) The idea allows people to avoid thinking on their own and simply assign anything they do not understand to something no one can explain. But if I tried to convince others they should bend to my way of "thinking" (believing), I feel that is the same as any other commonly accepted religion in existence.
The story itself was good, although not compelling.
The performance itself was very good....however, just illustrated my point further.
Yes - I enjoy hearing arguments for unprovable assumptions.
For me yes, I have a busy schedule and a long commute. Audio books allow me much more time to read(listen).
I found Mr. Dawkins does what very few people do. He gives you information from both sides of the arguments and allows the information to make the argument not the other way around. (Michael Shermers Baloney Detection kit)
Ms. Ward does a fabulous job, I love her tones and sarcasms. She adds great dimension and personality to the reading. It is very much like having a conversation with 2 people over a coffee.
Over and over Mr. Dawkins opened my eyes to how I had been spoon fed only the tastiest bits of the bible and religion. I have never been a person of great faith and now I understand why.
I think it would be quite something to meet Mr. Dawkins. I intend to seek out more of his work. I will also be trying to see or hear any of his interviews that are available. What an inspiring mentor.
Dawkins makes some nice points. Parts of the book seem to drag on a bit longer than necessary, but worth a listen/read.
The book makes a case for agnosticism and lor atheism I would have saved my money had I known up front the content was aimed at proselytizing for this position. This is of absolutely no interest to me I would like to screen this type of content out of my library and obtain refunds and return these volumes to the seller.
Excellent book. Some minor errors, but on the whole makes good sense and I am sure will be helpful for th e fence-sitters who can't make up their minds, mainly because they just don't have enough information.