The history delves generously into over a dozen. Philosophical frameworks. And relates them to religious faiths. And gives you some good areas of application at the end
I enjoy listening to Dr. Kreeft speak, so I'd say yes.
Anything by Kreeft. He has written dozens of books, all of which I recommend.
Passionate. Informed. Brilliant.
I enjoyed the numerous comparisons of the many philosophers who shaped Western thinking. Even those with just a passing interest in philosophy have heard these names before, but maybe can't fully explain their concepts. Kreeft breaks down what the greatest thinkers believed and why they believed it - throwing in his opinions once in a while.
I'm addicted to Kreeft, so I probably came into this a little biased. He has a few dozen talks available for download on Amazon and I have purchased each one and listened to them numerous times. When I ran out of talks to buy on Amazon I started looking for videotaped speeches online and once I exhausted all that YouTube had to offer I eventually thought about Audible. This course was fantastic and I will be listening to it again as well as purchasing his other books/courses through Audible. Kreeft has a distinctly unapologetic Catholic slant and that could conceivably turn some people off. But he backs up each and every one of his own concepts with solid logical proof.
I gave the book 3 stars for Performance simply because for the first few hours the audio lagged in a really annoying way. My first instinct was, "that's not Kreeft," but then I realized it was just playing at the wrong speed. After a few hours the problem suddenly corrected itself and everything sounded right. But the first few hours are so odd sounding that I literally changed the speed to 1.5 just to keep from losing my mind..
Excellent book for those who have some familiarity with Ethics. It scans, contrasts, and explains the relationships (or contradictions) of most moral thought traditions through seminal author stances.
As intended, the book is a brief history and superficial treatment of many traditions or schools of ethical reasoning. For those seeking a 'deep dive' into one tradition, this isn't the book. Further, the author does not impose a universal unifying theory. As with most good scholarship and teaching, the author explains and critiques; but allows the reader to think independently.
Excellent pace by the narrator. Brisk enough to hold interest, appropriate pauses to allow for reflection. This is not an easy balance, as this book requires engagement with nuanced ideas and logic.
This book/lecture/course is very easy to listen to. Mr. Kreeft starts with the ancient Greeks, goes up through Machiavelli, Kant, and others. He follows the discovery of each "new" philosophical/ethical idea, what was happening historically, and what other major philosophers were saying at the same time. He is subtle in his opinions; Mr. Kreeft doesn't lecture to you, but rather tells you a story. It's entertaining and educational.
I found that as a narrator, Mr. Kreeft was easy to understand - no hums, or haws. Very clear voice with a personal tone.
This is my first Modern Ethics lecture (I'm more The Great Courses kind), and this Ethics course makes me curious to try another in their series.
Very digestible presentation. Does a reasonable job of presenting ancient philosophers' views, then separately asserting his opinions.
He read's well for a content author, so the emphasis is perfect. Philosophy is particularly awkward when read by the average author.
His philosophical positions are totally absurd from my thinking. Example: He asserts that if God exists and is morally perfect, then god must be the basis or our morality. I can't even begin to understand how someone who calls himself a philosopher could sling together such a collection of unsubstantiated claims. "if god exists and is morally perfect?" That seems utterly impossible for any creature, sentient or not but fine, we'll just assume it's true even though we can't begin to understand the implications. "Then our morality must be based on god's" What!? God is a completely different kind of organism from us and there's only one of him. His social morality would be fundamentally different from ours. He is far more powerful than we are. His morality requires him to show far greater restraint in using his power to his own benefit than humans do. I can go on, but you get the point.
This audiobook looks at important topics in ethics but is very biased by the author. The author takes every chance he can to promote christianity and christian principles over other viewpoints and to promote old views over modern views. Furthermore the author (Kreeft) gives his personal assessments in value-oriented ways rather than descriptive ones. This means that you end up learning much more about the author than about the topics he purports to cover. If you are a christian, this might be an accessible way to learn about philosophy but be warned that it is a dishonest representation of the material by someone who doesn't fully understand it.
I really wanted to learn about this subject. Previous reviews said it is tainted by the lecturer's religious bias but I thought I'd try it anyhow. I was disappointed to discover that the bad reviews were fair. It feels patronising and has overtones of religion and the lecturers thinly veiled religious self-justification stewn throughout which make mining it for genuine knowledge, of which the lecturer has some to offer, simply annoying.
I downloaded the Modern Scholar on polical theory which presented its facts and perspectives in such an open and warmly detached manner. That experience gave me faith in the series so I assumed the bad reviews for this one on Ethics were just because ethics is a touchy subject for many readers.
I'm afraid this lecturer does not inspire confidence as its easy to sense his prejudice driving much of the opinion and perspective he presents, even to the point where he contradicts himself when justifying his own personal perspectives along the way. It made me feel like I was only being presented half the picture. It made me more interested in the other intellectuals he ridicules throughout than in listening to him. Though obviously a highly educated man, he cannot share what knowlege he has objectively because of the religious way he's gone about forming his speculation.
I will think twice before trusting the "Modern Scholar" series again just on its name after this download. Annoying and unbalanced.