The testimony was powerful...though falsified. Washington Post articles, transcripts from his interviews, and his own emails all contradict what he said. I would suggest hearing this, but under the pretense that you understand he's contradicted by his own statements previously. There's also testimony Republicans are trying to declassify that are the exact opposite of what he says here -- both under oath.
My review is simply based on my concern that we learn from this committee and implement processes and procedures to help prevent future attacks. However, Dick Clark is a LIAR. His book of lies and half-truths, and his statements before the committee were simply to make money. He applauds Clinton's administration that did absolutely nothing for 8 years; yet, he condemns President Bush who was in office less than 9 months and has attacked the terrorists with vengeance never before seen in a President.
The Reviewing audience with favorable comments must be living in a cocoon. Their ignorance permeates through their comments and they will never help this country destroy the terrorists. I pity their children and the children of the United States who will pay the price for their lack of wisdom and decisions to not want to know the complete TRUTH of the calamity of 9.11. GOD please help us. Ernie Garner
When this little boy has a tantrum and it is against a republican president - the media sure listens! He can not get his story straight to save his life, first he tells us Bush increased resources f fold over the Clintonistas then bush and friends were disinteretsed.
So which is it Ricky?