I am brutally honest. Popular, love everything they read, reviewers are scared to go neg. and risk their ranking. It's your money!!!
EXTREMES ARE NEVER HEALTHY
Asimov wrote a lot of books, but not that much pulp fiction. Unlike Clarke he did not concentrate on the science. Asimov seemed to be concerned with society and what it would be like to live in the future. His books are cerebral. Don't expect long chase scenes, big explosions, or even the wonder of a future world. If you buy this book or any book written by Asimov than expect to think about consequences, relationships, or everyday life. This starts out slow, but gets better as it goes. I personally think it is one of Asimov's better stories, but it takes time to get there.
I loved the narrator. I might not want him to read my next Zombie book, but I believe he captures the mood of this book. He understands the material and reads it perfectly.
loved the foundation trilogy, so thought I might like this one. not so. it was a real struggle to stay with the plot.
There are multiple twists most chapters. Especially toward the end. Asimov's masterwork, I say. The reading is really well done. Multiple accents and good pauses. I adore this book. Read it. Go.
I have great affection and respect for Asimov but this story shows it's 1955 date in culture more than in technology. Thousands of years on, the essential conflict is men fighting each other for power and over women. The lone woman is a temptress and in fact there is a Garden of Eden theme that is pretty heavily stressed. The concepts of time in the book are interesting, and whether changing the past or future removes free will is a central question. The narrator was awfully SLOOOW. I tried to speed up the audio but on my player that gave it an echo, so I just stuck with it.
Recent graduate New York Institute of Photography. Love SciFi and mystery.
Having read the book in high school (and I still have it), I absolutely love it and still do. It is a great story about the possibilities of time travel, both good and bad.
The relationship of the various lead characters.
Time for anything . . . or nothing
Among the best of Isaac Asimov's novels. Certainly ahead of it's time. The characters are engaging. The story is imaginative and plausible. Better than the average Sic-Fi novel, and this novel has aged very well, which cannot be said of very many Sci-Fi novels from this era.
I read this book more than thirty years ago, I was immediately engrossed again. But, if temporal paradoxes are not your thing you better stay away. The narrator grew into the story. His style of careful pronunciation annoyed me at first and throughout the book he makes mistakes with intonation. But his hateful Finge, his driven Twissel and his lovely Noies will stay with me for the next thirty years.