In the middle . I enjoy a story line that is not predictable .
Not sure .
Sam . Hangs in the back but is charming .
No . Many details to take in .
Quite far up, could have been on top if it were not for one thing missing in the story.
Chet & Bernie series, which also have a good narrator, great characters and a good storyline.
When Cassy tells her partner about her past.
He's back where it all started, only this time all alone in the woods with his terror....
I was greatly dissappointed over the first case not being solved!
I picked this up on the recommendation of a friend. After I finished, I immediately downloaded every other book by this author. Great story. Sucks you right in to the characters' joys and woes.
Yes. It is still suspenseful with interesting characters and well written.
Yes, I heard her other books are better.
Murders decades apart are connected by one man.
This book is totally boring but it sure takes forever to get around to anything happening. I don't know how it ends and didn't have he patience to find out. Can I get my credit back?
I love mystry thrillers of all kinds: Jennifer Winspear, Agatha Christi, the Mrs. Pollifax series, and even Jack Reacher and Pendegast, but the very best are the Swedish writers and TANA FRENCH! I read the last in the series first because I didn't realize it was a series. It was such a good book too. And I just finished "In The Woods". Beautfiul language, rich characters that are real people you can relate to, and realistic twists and turns that can't allow you to stop listening. I am so looking forward to listening to "The Likeness" which I just down loaded but I am already feeling sad that there are no more. Yes, dounload this book! It is fantastic.
I read wonderful reviews about this book but was disappointed in the story. Very dark. Lots and lots of unnecessary detail. No smiling moments that make you reflect on the good that comes with the bad. I finally skipped to the last chapter to see
How can anything this long be so incomplete? I thought I must have been missing a section of the story. How can anything drone on and on for so long without having an ending? And no, I am not a simpleton that can't understand and appreciate depth in a story, and also not a sheep that will ooh and ahh over a piece of crap. I'm not turned off of the genre, but I will never do Tana French again.
This a fabulously well told and riveting story about which it is almost impossible to speak without giving spoilers. Read it, but make sure you have a free weekend, you are not going to be able to stop.
There is a feel of woman-author representing male psyche in the first-person detective's musings, but strangely not his dialogue. Although, it was a little jarring and difficult to really get into major sections of the dialogue because of the way the reader raises his voice for spoken parts to distinguish from unspoken narrative. It did make you feel there was shouting instead of discussion, which distracts you from the book, conversation and plot. The story is good enough to keep me going however.
The main character is not a wholly pleasant person, as he is finding his own way through the fog of a past childhood trauma. I'm about two-thirds of the way through the book and am getting a strong impression that he is misunderstanding things because of this; perhaps I'll have to go over previous events in my head later to sort this out and thus the author is impressing me - mysteries that make you think on multiple levels are that much more entertaining.
Anyone who could do a proper set of Irish accents would have been a better narration choice. I will listen to the next book in this series specifically because of the reviews praising that narrator's talent with accents.
Mr. Crossley does not seem to be an accurate interpreter of character dialogue, or even of the narrative, for which I would fault the director/producer of this performance as well. It was painfully obvious to me at too many moments that lines were said wrong and inflections or emphases were off. This happened most during dialogue, and I feel I'm missing clues or foreshadowing because of it.
The suspense is building faster now that the main character has started to speak of reflecting on the events from some point in the future, a tactic working its way gradually into the storyline. It serves to force one to think about resolution without actually telling us whether the case will actually be solved, while speeding up the timeline through slower parts of the investigation so we don't get bogged down. The characters come through as solidly-developed; no one is perfectly anything, and small moments of humor and other interactions (friction, impatience, etc) are realistic and grounded. Characters should maintain their separateness throughout a novel - they should behave as independent actors with their own mannerisms and thought patterns, and this author seems to have been able to maintain this throughout, which I believe is difficult and laudable.