I really enjoyed this book. As an academic at a technological research institution, many of my peers think that emotions don't exist. Consequently, emotional intelligence is a very useful competitive tool on par with, say, using performance enhancing drugs to stay up all night tabulating test results. Oh well.
Absolutely vital information!
Goleman's Social Intelligence for deepening and applying the power of our inherent emotional brilliance to enriching our own lives, relationships and the world we all share.
What I learned amazed and delighted me...I feel much more empowered in my life from listening to Emotional Intelligence. In fact, I know I am more wisely empowered.
Daniel Goleman's Emotional Intelligence - a long yet interesting and invaluable listen from Audible - has been great. I've now started with Social Intelligence by Goleman to learn more about applying the lessons and info he shares. Both are highly recommended!
This is possibly the worst narration I have ever heard. I read the book in print and wanted to listen to it in the car as a refresher. I saw some of the comments warning of poor narration, but thought, 'how bad can it really be'? Turns out... pretty horrible. I couldn't make it through the whole book. I think they recruited the guy who narrated all of those 1950's science filmstrips, except he keeps mispronouncing words. The book is great, but avoid the audiobook.
Yes. Emotional Intelligence brought me a sort of questions about myself that I have never found anywhere else or thought about it. It made me understand why woman is so motivated by emotions while man is more rational.
When he says that woman get in an intimate relationship, so the physical attraction she feels confuses her with emotional attraction because of the closeness of these two areas in the brain, while man knows how to distinguish these attractions because he has these two areas on the opposite sides.
I don't know if it was my favorite or the most shocking part is when he says that woman has their emotional part in the brain 8 times bigger than the man.
I loved everything about the book, but when he starts to get too scientifically, then it was a little boring, but still interesting.
I believe all women in the planet should read this book and try to fix themselves from this emotional roller coaster that is their emotional lives by understanding a little bit more about their own and to shift their perspective in how to be a woman that is emotional intelligent.
No - I heard about this book from a coworker. She made it sound fascinating. She read the paper book and I need to listen. Well, this book was so painful to listen to that I have no idea whether the content is good or not!
Surprisingly, I heard an interview of Daniel Goleman on NPR for his new book Focus. Now, HE was so enthusiastic, I wanted to hear the book too. So I'm glad to see that he reads his own book Focus. I hope that he goes back and records this one too because I'd love to hear him read it.
The author is a great speaker...let him read the book, not this other guy. For these informational, non-fiction works, I think the author is the one who is most enthusiastic about the ideas.
Yes. It explains the topic very well. Understanding emotions is one of the most important things someone can learn and this book explains it very well.
Emotional Intelligence provides a look into how emotion drives everything we do. Those that are able to understand this, and can deal with it, have a larger potential than those with a more pure intellectual outlook on how people behave. Goleman's book does an excellent job of peeling back myths about how rational people are, and challenges the listener to analyze how emotions drive them. It also provides some minimal guidance on understanding other people's emotional behavior.
Whitener talks like an android, but it doesn't detract too much from the audiobook.
Before embarking on his gargantuan research project (which includes several meta-analyses and decades of research, galloped along by recent advances in brain imaging technology) Daniel Goleman writes a compelling and convincing case, eschewing jargon and esoteric terminology for a more humanistic and compassionate argument. He was not overreacting when he saw American society looming towards a cliff of violence, signs of which included school shootings. All over the world, children are doing worse on matters of emotional literacy and acumen. This, combined with a natural tendency towards aggression in some children, puts them at risk of precipitating the next Columbine massacre. More and more children exhibit signs of depression, secrecy, isolation, delinquency, drug use and violent tendencies.
The book does begins with a look at the amygdala (which is the seat of basic emotions and instinct), hypothalamus (which controls involuntary movements and produces hormones) and the neocortex, which is most developed in humans and allows us to reason deeply and profoundly, to the extent of having thoughts and feelings about our thoughts and feelings.
A gruesome and tragic emotional hijacking sets the stage for the importance of research into identifying and solving problems wrought by mismanaged impulses. After all, the word "emotion" comes from the Greek word meaning "to move." Our emotions have an almost ironclad hold on us.
While IQ was traditionally thought of as the crucial and all-encompassing ingredient of success, Project Spectrum has turned this finding on its head, with its research into multiple intelligences including leadership and social awareness. This can be observed in children in elementary school and is a better predictor of future success than IQ. For instance, a young girl who knows how to pair her classmates into best friend groupings and identify their favourite toys has the talents for negotiation and peaceful conflict resolution. The foundational pillars of empathy can be seen at work.
Mastering a musical instrument or honing one's natural gift for tennis or any other sport depends, more than anything else, on a child's desire to excel. Parents who push their own selfish aspirations onto their offspring will only foster bitterness, frustration and resentment in their children. The marshmallow restraint test, conducted on young children and followed-up decades later in life, proved an excellent predictor of self-control (which also happens to be one of the key components of learning HOW to learn).
Conversely, child rapists and sociopaths have no connections or concern for others, and as such, become glib liars and are adept at making up horrific justifications for their ghoulish and barbaric deeds. These emotional cavemen seem to be impervious to psychotherapy at present.
Dedicating oneself to charity work was shown to be an excellent remedy for anxiety and stress, but was also one of the least utilised options that was used by participants in studies. SEL classes offer hope to change this for the better in the future, and countries such as Singapore have already begun such programs. As anxiety and stress (disproportionate pressure and worry) can lead to an early death, there is a strong incentive for even adults to change their behaviour. A decade before Barbara Ehrenreich revealed the defeatism and victim-blaming that Norman Vincent Peale-style positive thinking can engender. Realism, compassion and companionship are far more crucial. Simply having someone with you who is willing to help shoulder one's burdens can even reduce repeat heart attacks and extend the lives of cancer patients.
Relationships at work and in love are more similar than we might think, and something as simple as listening, repeating the other party's concerns, and taking breaks when necessary can prevent minor spats from exploding into divorce, termination of employment, or worse. And, as one could expect, parents who arbitrarily and randomly punish their children encourage their kids to emulate such behaviour (which can be seen even in young toddlers), become bullies, and link punishment to getting caught rather than hurting others. This emulation-instinct is so powerful that it can and will override a toddler's natural empathy, which, under normal circumstances, prevent them from continuing to clobber a child who is already hurt and whimpering.
Counterintuitively, playing games such as "Purdy", where children re-enacted a school shooting (the perpetrator was named Purdy) can help them deal with trauma by exerting imagined control over a gruesome situation. Some Holocaust survivors were also observed to have recovered, at least in part, from the ever-present images of the terror and atrocities they experienced and witnessed. Therapy can give the individual control over their fears and traumas to the degree that they will never be held captive to them again.
The book concludes with a hopeful look at the future and the possible fruits of research into brain plasticity and the promises of new technology. I wish Goleman and his research crew all the best in their endeavours.
This book has been around for long enough. I probably won't say anything new about it.
It draws the map of what makes us who we are, and suggests how to be our best. It should be taught in elementary school (Okay, slightly simplified) and be required reading by HS. It can be poignant, painful even when you stumble on those "aha" moments, discovering why you do what you do (and are not so proud of). But it is neither moralistic nor does it indulge your flaws. It just describes the complex bundle that we humans are, with both scientific accuracy and compassion. If all the people in a position of power read it, the world would be a much better place. To read this book is to learn how to read yourself.
I gave only four stars for the performance because although Barrett Whitener does a decent job of reading, he is a little cold and it took me a while to get used to his nasal voice. I would have preferred this book to be read by Daniel Goleman himself, who is heard in the Preface and the Epilogue.
not a cliff hanger, it is an educational book
a bit dry
info a bit outdated, but expected give copyright date