My difficulty was that I simply did not connect with the primary character, Adam Chase, enough to care about his situation. I appreciated how he was grappling with some of his family issues, but I never really found him overall that interesting. Nor did care too much about his predicament. Could be me. Other characters were drawn with fairly bold lines, not much nuance to any of them. I'm sure that was intentional, almost requisite for this plot to work. But again I failed to connect with any of them. So I did not feel much anticipation regarding the overall resolution of many of their conflicts. The plot was somewhat interesting but not gripping or demanding. The strength of the story was Adam's efforts at dealing with issues involving his mother and father and family. The author handles this very well and demonstrates a clear understanding of human nature and family motivations.
This book was disappointing. THe story is a soap opera w/ one dimensional characters who are emotionally and developmentally stunted. While the plot has some twists, the characters are absolutely predictable: of course they refuse to go to therapy, of course they resist legitimate pain medication, of course they drink too much (the men, of course), of course the males are emotionally bankrupt and of course the females are long-suffering and damaged. Some moments of lyrical writing - descriptions of place - have substance but the rest of the book is disappointing. Hope this author gets better.
The Good: great narration.... Despite the fact that the book cornered characters into a restricted range of behavior- the narrator made the best of it. He was truly impressive and I believe I kept listening due to his prowess.
The Bad: this morality tale hiding behind the guise of a mystery becomes tiresome. If the concepts of forgiveness, the psychology of cutting, or the sticky web of family had ever been truly scratched I would have been satisfied; however, to speak the name and think that you have given the subject due diligence is just a shame.
The Ugly: how many times can a girlfriend lose her cool, slap her boyfriend, say "I'm sorry, but you left me" before you begin to yawn or at least reach for fast forward OR How many times can the angry young man act like THE ANGRY YOUNG MAN before you as the reader begin to say "okay leave" or "okay kill him" or "okay, but please go see a shrink?" Listening to this book was like wading to your ankles in the shallow end.
No matter where you go, there you are.
I actually don't know what a soap opera is like, but I understand they are twisting, implausible fantasies that are designed to convince the housebound to purchase certain brands of laundry detergent. Vignette after vignette of startling betrayal, revelations of incest or bigamy or any number of other types of exaggerated nonsense is not my idea of "raising the genre of mystery to fine literature" as one hyperbolic reviewer was misguided enough to say.
This book's choice as an Edgar winner has ruined the honor's credibility and certainly has Mr. Poe spinning in his grave.
CLassic B movie kind of story. Plotting is relatively predictable, characters stock, and language is painful: "He pressed his lips against her and she said, I hate you I hate you."
Yet this won best novel of 08 at the Edgars awards. So clearly some people liked it.
The plot is weak; characters are shallow; dialogue is trivial; and it's tiresome to listen to. Don't waste your time!
Baby Boomer in Raleigh NC. Faves include James Lee Burke, CJ Box, Baldacci, Flynn, Child, DeMille, Crais, Connolly, Thor, Coes, L'amour. Average two books/week.
John Hart uses Salisbury NC like Greg Iles uses Natchez MS and Nelson Demille uses Long Island. He (Hart) is a modern day Faulkner in his understanding of the Southern family foibles and eccentricities. This is my second John Hart novel and I certainly will listen to the next two.
The narrator fits the setting to my ear.
Each Hart novel, although each set in the same small Southern town involves completely different sets of characters. I am somewhat familiar with Salisbury and find the circumstances quite believable.
From the number of good reviews and the book being a Poe nominee I held a lot of hope. I found the initial premise interesting. As I listened on I found myself rolling my eyes with the vast number of clichés and catch phrases. The number of side plots became ridiculous and I had a strong suspicious of the true perpetrator by the second chapter (that’s not good). I carried on as the book had brief periods of a solid theme. Sadly, those periods were brief and distance. The overall theme has been seen on LMN (network) and I often thought oh, this part was on Law & Order and I’m sure this was or could be a plot on Dallas. It could easily be a soap/drama. If the author stuck with the initial theme, focused on 1 side plot and eliminated the catch phrases this could have been a book I would have reviewed as a good read.
And the narrator sound liked Tootsie.
Garden-variety mystery with senseless characters who couldn't be more two-dimensional. A throwaway. I got this b/c I thought it would be a good car listen for a long trip but YUCK. So stupid. Couldn't get past the first couple of hours.
Slow start but good character development and interesting story.
It was his narration that kept me interested at first.
Yes, especially for a long drive.
Good but not great story mainly just because it took a while to get into it. Hart took his time drawing you in making you wonder just, "why is he doing that?" But I kept rooting for the guy which kept me involved. The story did stick with me for a while, worth the time, but it's a slow and steady ride.