I liked the overall book, many of the points made were old news. The points made in the book were many of the same topics discussed in Malcolm Gladwell's books.
Very interesting book! A bit repetitive, but well worth the read. It was nice to see them discuss the ramifications of too much deliberate practice.
i don't know who was first Gladwell in Outliers or Colvin in his book in this study but they are both good . Colvin in this book does show few new examples on the theory of "talent " i love the first chapters of this book because of all the examples that he brings to the table and you can verify them on your own, the second part of this book is more on a corporate level but still engaging over all its a nice gem in your library if you have one
worth the effort !!
Good, especially Chapter 5. As someone who has achieved a lot in my field, and as a teacher in the same field, I agree with a lot of the information presented.
Yet another book looking to top the unofficial "pedagogic" genre of the likes of Gladstone's "Blink."
And just like Gladstone, this author takes good, solid information and weaves his own agenda through the narrative to produce something not entirely untrue, but so out of balance that it really cannot be taken seriously.
"Talent's" first few chapters set the premise for the book, but it is unfortunately a false premise. Long story short, talent without practice and hard work is usually wasted, but the author sails past this well balanced and reasonable view and essentially makes the erroneous case that most kids could be the next Tiger Woods or Bill Gates if they were only given the same environment.
This book should be in the $2.99 bargain box at your local bookstore. I never heard anyone ramble for 7 hours on what could have been said in probably 10 minutes. I already knew it was nurture not nature. And I also know it takes about 10,000 hrs of practice to become an expert at most things. So I need him to ramble on that being intrigued and interested in your sugbject is the true determining factor? Let me sum up the book for you and you can send me just 1 dollar. Find something you will stick to,but make sure you love it so much that you will enjoy practicing 'after" you become great as well." Thats the entire book. Dont waste your time on this. The really sad part of this is that it lets you know that most of us who are not obsessive people have no chance at being great at anything. Why? Because if we practice as long as the next expert, but our normal mind is also thinking about other enjoyable things, you cant be great. Why do you all think the class nerds who had no interest in girls, sports, or anything exciting always became the most successful. Life is a rigged game, is the only lesson Ive learned after 7 hours.
I am a highly motivated, highly paid Medical Device Sales Rep. I enjoy cutting edge self development books. This book was a huge disapointment. I found myself fast forwarding through a great deal of it.
Save your money.
He even mentions it, in the film industry actors are referred to as the "talent" he then states that what they are saying is a just a super generalized way of referring to any person working that specific job.
This is extraordinarily wrong and quite frankly a little insultingly stupid. Actors and other performers are referred to as the talent BECAUSE they are unique and what they do CANNOT be done by any person off the street who simply 'deliberately' practices enough. He basically completely denies that there is any genetic human diversity as it relates to personality or ability in any aspect. Sensitivity is not a practicable human skill to be learned from a text book.
He rests almost his entire case on a few specific activities that even he acknowledges can also be done by a robot. this book is completely out of touch and seems written more to give false hope to average joes. or to let people blame their parents for their own inability to be great in the activities they wish they were great in.
Nobody believes that if you are talented in a specific area that your children are bound to also be talented in that same area. He is arguing against a point of view based on old eugenics beliefs held in the 13th century. Human traits can be passed on and dormant for hundreds of generations, he basically denies everything we have learned about the human genome in the last few decades. He states again and again that your genes don't make any difference and all that matters is your ability to torture yourself with countless hours of practice.
I feel very sorry for the people who take the advice of this book and end up wasting their time because of it.