He was one of the most influential capitalist that influenced business and morals. A advocate for peace, and uplifting of mankind. He wasn't perfect but what mortal is?
Very in depth telling of Carnegie's life. Surprised by the amount of letters that were available and made part of this book. Added a lot to parts and in others definitely not necessary. I will be listening to this again.
Very long book. I actually have to listen to it again to remember the first half of it.
I liked his book with Napoleon Hill better.
Grover Gardner has a very natural story-telling voice which draws you in and keeps you wanting more.
This book has made Carnegie seem more human in many ways for I have always had an almost a God-like perception of him after reading the Gospel of Wealth essay.
This book also made me want to visit Scotland!
This was a decent read but my God was it long! I feel like the book could easily have been cut in half and would have told a story equal in history, dialog, and content. This one just seemed to drag on and on, and on.
The book talks about the childhood and young adulthood of Mr. Carnegie, but cuts right to the chase. He makes himself a millionaire in the first 1/10 of the book and the rest id spent discussing his philanthropies, which though interesting, becomes dry at times.
I’m more interested in how he made his money and since he did it so young, there really isn’t much to tell in that regard. And since he saved darn near every correspondence throughout his life the book subject the reader to often dull and un-interesting introspects of his life. Even his love life seemed dull.
I don’t regret the time I spent listening to the dialog, as there are many interesting facts that kept me tuned in. I was just hoping for a biography that placed more focus on how he made his millions versus how he spent it.
Less about his business, more about his charity and politics. Overall still a good read about AC's life. Amazing how much he can and has accomplished by writing letters.
Capture a lot of the dynamic personality of Carnegie while not ignoring his foibles. As with most biographical works, it possessed its own bias, but it was milder than most. It captured the complex nature of the man and the inherent dichotomy of a philanthropic robber baron.
Mike @ CustomChess.com
The writing in this book was great. The author presents all the information in a logical, linear way that is easy to follow, and does a great job of capturing the essence of Andrew Carnegie. Grover Gardner does a fantastic job of reading capturing the inflection of the author as well. The peoblem is that Andrew Carnegie was not really all that intersting. He was involved in some inovating and exciting things early in his life which led him to accumulate a fair amount of money. From his early 30's on, however, he basically just functioned as a source of capital, while relying on the brains and hard work of others to do the bulk of the work in building his fortune. Meanwhile he flitted around the world traveling and fishing and what not. Then, he spent the latter part of his life trying to influence others to accomplish great things... again, trying to rely on them to actually do the work. Even his philanthropy work was, for the most part, delegated to others. Then, he relied on the hard work of his trustees to do good works with the funds. Carnegie was a smart man who knew how to surround himself with talented, hard working people who could achieve great things for him. In the end, however, he personally didn't significantly contribute much or accomplish much on his own. The exception to that perhaps being his philosophy of philanthropy. There are more intersting people to read about from the same period, such as Rockefeller or the Morgans.